Wikidata:Property proposal/Ancestry.com ID
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ancestry.com profile ID
[edit]Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
Description | MISSING |
---|---|
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | human (Q5) |
Allowed values | letters and numbers |
Example 1 | Richard Feynman (Q39246) → 24-4mlgvl |
Example 2 | David M. Himmelblau (Q59626616) → 24-17j7296 |
Example 3 | Morris Shamos (Q96043428) → 24-8gvttl |
Formatter URL | https://www.ancestry.com/genealogy/records/$1 |
See also | Geni.com profile ID (P2600), DAR ancestor ID (P7969) |
Motivation
[edit]I figured it would make sense to add this since we already have Geni.com profile ID (P2600). Bender235 (talk) 22:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
[edit]- Is this ID stable?--GZWDer (talk) 16:50, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- You mean does it change over time? --Bender235 (talk) 16:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes "stable" means we can expect it to not change over time. --Melderick (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Feels like you point on a record not the person?!?!? records/david-m-himmelblau-24-17j7296 compare WikiTree person ID (P2949) were you have one person just in one tree...
- If you ckeck me in my tree person/tree/20261258/person/921521013/facts looks like they have unique ids for every tree and person? feels better if they had unique ids per person. If someone "import" a person into another tree can we find that person in Ancestry or do we need to add another Wikidata property value... - Salgo60 (talk) 08:48, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. Are you suggesting that david-m-himmelblau-24-17j7296 points to records about anyone named "David M. Himmelblau", not just David M. Himmelblau (Q59626616)? --Bender235 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Bender235:, I don't know what Salgo60 meant but the question you mention is interesting. What is the answer ? --Melderick (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- To my knowledge they are unique. --Bender235 (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Bender235:, I don't know what Salgo60 meant but the question you mention is interesting. What is the answer ? --Melderick (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not sure I understand. Are you suggesting that david-m-himmelblau-24-17j7296 points to records about anyone named "David M. Himmelblau", not just David M. Himmelblau (Q59626616)? --Bender235 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Genealogy --- Jura 14:33, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. Are these IDs stable? What form of authority control is practiced? Since the same person can exist in any number of user-created family trees could there potentially be an infinite number of identifiers for the same individual? Gamaliel (talk) 15:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Do you have an example of the same person having multiple IDs? --Bender235 (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- For the sake of argument, let's assume this can't happen somehow. Only one tree is displayed on the examples you linked. What process is used to decide which tree is displayed? If we are going to create a property for a website which relies on a huge amount of user-generated data, we should have some idea of how it sorts through all that data and decides, hey, this is the correct tree out of 1000 trees. Gamaliel (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: These appear to be new landing pages for unique people. Previously landing pages were for first_name and last_name combinations, and pointed to the various trees that combination was in, and you could only see more information if you had a paid account. It really only served as a teaser, to get you pay for an account, once you saw a familiar name. Familysearch also has a unique landing page for people, that is viewable by people not registered for an account. See for example: Anton Julius Winblad at Familysearch vs. Anton Julius Winblad at Ancestry The link at Familysearch takes you to his full record once logged in to a free account. The Ancestry one has no more information beyond what you see on the landing page, since he may appear in a dozen trees. --RAN (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Unlike FamilySearch (Q3066228), Geni.com (Q2621214) or WikiTree (Q1074931) Ancestry (Q26878196) is not "single tree" based, but rather individual tree based. Merging people from different trees is not possible, only "connect" them (with paid account only). Duplicates are inevitable.--Jklamo (talk) 09:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose per Jklamo. Duplicates are not just inevitable, they're the norm. In my personal experience with Ancestry, most normal people are in several family trees, and famous people or widely shared ancestors can be in hundreds of trees. This would be a mess. –IagoQnsi (talk) 14:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Not done no consensus to create --DannyS712 (talk) 12:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)