Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013/3

From Wikidata
< Wikidata:Administrators | Confirm 2013
Revision as of 15:55, 26 November 2017 by ValterVBot (talk | contribs) (BOT: Fix of Special:LintErrors)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This was the voting page for administrator confirmations running from 2 Feb to 6 Feb. Voting ended at 23:59 (UTC) on 6 February 2013.

Ajraddatz (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended indefinitely. Techman224Talk 00:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: Been serving as a global admin and then a local admin here since early November, and am still very active and looking forward to seeing Wikidata's development and expansion. I would love to continue to serve the community as an admin if confirmed. Ajraddatz (Talk) 22:07, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support Active administrator. --Sk!d (talk) 00:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Another user that has all my trust. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support I like his involvement in helping out with project affairs.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Rschen7754 00:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Excellent work. This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Reconfirm Yes, definitely. One of the best users we've got. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support - Hoo man (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support, no problems--Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support easiest decision. --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support Active admin. -- Tucoxn (talk) 09:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Daniel749 talk 10:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Of course. Skull33 (talk) 10:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support, of course. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 11:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Iste (D) 11:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support ----Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Strong support obviously knows how to put the buttons to good use. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Oppose — much too negative. Negative persons are dangerous admins. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Mind explaining that one a bit? Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Sure. --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --J36miles (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Techman224Talk 01:23, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --Jitrixis (talk) 12:36, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Strong  Support --LlamaAl (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33.  Support Rzuwig► 17:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34.  Support IW 19:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35.  Support -- feuerst – talk 07:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36.  Support Active, trusted and experienced. No any reasons for no. Érico Wouters msg 01:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37.  Support Hurricanefan24 (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Skull33 (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended indefinitely. Techman224Talk 00:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: (en) I have been serving as a Wikidata administrator since early November. I am also a sysop on frwiki since July 2011. I don't think my contribution here as an admin has been vital for the project, but I do feel I am useful. Moreover, I am planning to increase my contribution as the project grows. As I said on my request for permission, I (still!) can't help with technical matters, but I would love to keep serving as an admin and helping with cleaning up, vandalism, and general maintenance. (fr) Je suis administrateur de Wikidata depuis le début du mois de novembre et sysop sur la Wikipédia en français depuis juillet 2011. Je ne pense pas être indispensable pour le projet, mais je me sens tout de même utile. J'ai de plus l'intention d'accroître mon activité petit à petit. Comme je l'ai précisé dans ma demande, je ne peux pas m'occuper des problèmes techniques mais ce serait un plaisir pour moi de continuer à aider à nettoyer, à lutter contre le vandalisme, etc. Skull33 (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support Doesn't spend his or her entire life on Wikidata, but is on quite a bit and consistently. Need for the tools + trusted. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:10, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support, sufficient activity level--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 11:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 11:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Iste (D) 11:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Wants to increase admin activity, feels useful ;) . Conny (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  16.  Support - Bzh-99 (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support --Jitrixis (talk) 12:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Wholle (talk) 13:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support --Daniel749 talk 13:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Weak support - not many admin actions but otherwise seems to be fine.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support --LlamaAl (talk) 16:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support Rzuwig► 17:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support IW 19:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support -- feuerst – talk 07:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Techman224Talk 01:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support Érico Wouters msg 01:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support Hurricanefan24 (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Jitrixis (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended indefinitely. Techman224Talk 00:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: I have been serving as a Wikdata administrator since early november too. Since all these month I develop some gadgets for Wikidata and i also maintain and clean up Wikidata. I know that for some weeks I am less active because I prepare my baccalaureate, but in february I'm going back to develop some new gadgets for wikidata. I want to thanks this wonderfull team and community to all they have done on this project and I would love to continue to serve this community. It's why i'm requesting an administrator confirmations in 2013 on Wikidata. --Jitrixis (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support And good luck with your BA. ;) --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support Gadget writing is a big plus. Thanks for your work so far. This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support per This, that, and the other.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Reconfirm Perfectly acceptable credentials. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 03:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support, no problems--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --Daniel749 talk 10:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 11:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Iste (D) 11:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 12:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support mainly for gadget writing. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support Needs it for his work. Conny (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  22.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --Wholle (talk) 13:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support Althrough some of your admin actions could be better. For example, the AbuseFilter #1 does not match edits where the delete template has been added with an parameter (for example {{delete|reason}}). Personally I would have gone with added_lines rlike "{{delete\|*.*}}" instead. I am also wondering why you assigned autopatrol rights to yourself.--Snaevar (talk) 14:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    For your 1# exemple on AbuseFilter, I don't think about the parameters of a template I will fix it. For the 2# exemple I'm auto-assign the autopatrol flag because I want to test how works group in javascript (wgUserGroups) but when I want to remove this right i see that an other sysop do this before. --Jitrixis (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support --J36miles (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support Rzuwig► 17:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support IW 19:23, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support -- feuerst – talk 07:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support Techman224Talk 01:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support Érico Wouters msg 01:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Grondin (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
 Not done. The user withdrew this request and requested the removal of his rights at meta. -- Quentinv57 (talk) 12:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: (en) I have been serving as a Wikdata administrator since early november too. I want to continue helping the project with sysop rights (by exemple : fighting against vandalisme, Mediawiki interface editions, Gadgets, maintenance…). I'm also sysop in others project, by example Wikinews in (also bureaucrat), catalan (also bureaucrat) and portugues languages. Despite my professional duties I want to continue on this project. I'm requesting an administrator confirmation in 2013 on Wikidata for servir more this community. Thank's for all. Sorry for my bad english, i contribute mainly in french and catalan. (fr) Je suis administrateur dès l'ouverture de ce projet et il est dans mes intentions de contribuer et d'aider la communauté dans son développement (lutte contre le vandalisme, édition interface mediawiki, Gadgets, maintenance diverse…). Malgré mes obligations professionnelles je veux persister sur ce projet. Je suis également administrateur sur d'autres projets comme Wikinews en français (et bureaucrate), catalan (et bureaucrat) et portuguais. C'est pourquoi je sollicite la reconduccion de mon statut d'administreur. (ca) Sóc administrador des de l'obertura d'aquest projecte i vull continuar de contribuir-hi i sobretot ajudar-hi la comunitat en el seu desenvolupament (lluitar contra el vandalisme, edició de l'espai Mediawiki, Ginys, manteniment divers…) . Malgrat les meves activitats professionals, vull persistir en aquest Viqui. Igualment, soc administrador en altres projectes com a Viquinotícies en català (i buròcrata), francès (i buròcrata) i portuguès. És la raó que sol·licito la meva reconducció com a administrador.-- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 10:59, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Active with gadgets and edits. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:25, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn support due to canvassing, though not opposing because I still think that the user could use the tools well. Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support per Ajraddatz.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Support --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Reconfirm A clear plus. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support, the activity level is sufficient--Ymblanter (talk) 07:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Support --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support --Daniel749 talk 10:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Support Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 11:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Davidpar (talk) 11:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support --Iste (D) 11:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 12:05, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Support --Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support Clear case. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:11, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support See it as Ajraddatz. Conny (talk) 17:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  12.  Support - Bzh-99 (talk) 18:01, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support -Pic-Sou (talk) 21:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Castor (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support --Anskar (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Jordi Roqué (talk) 00:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Strong oppose completely unneeded canvassing Vogone (talk) 01:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Strong oppose per Vogone.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Oppose canvassing is not appropriate. --Rschen7754 02:15, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Weak oppose based on canvassing. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support I think it's not a massive canvassing, only a solicitation notice, does not intend to affect other users. They could choose to support or not, even though not choose. -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:55, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Oppose I'm sorry, but you can't just go onto another project and as a bunch of people that have never edited Wikidata before to come vote for your reconfirmation. Aside from that it's not neutrally worded ('It would be nice to have a Catalan speaking administrator' isn't neutral in this context), even if it were neutrally worded, the candidate wouldn't have placed the message there if he thought that people from that project were going to come over and oppose Grondin. He knew what he was trying to do, and I don't personally like it. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:21, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Neutral Good work on Wikidata, but canvassing is really bad thing. I hope it was just an ill-advised decision. --Stryn (talk) 08:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I apologize, it was just an ill-advised decisions, do you want I ask the stewards my removing of access.-- Grondin (talk) 10:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Strong oppose per Vogone -- Milad A380 talk? 09:19, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I apologize, Do you want, I've asked the steward my removal of access? --Grondin (talk) 10:19, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Weak oppose per Vogone. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 10:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Oppose I don't like canvassing too. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 11:44, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Vituzzu (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended indefinitely. Techman224Talk 00:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: (en) I've been using my steward's tools here since project's launch, then I ran as a local sysop in order to keep working in ordinary maintenance even when the Wikidata will opt-out from gs. During these months I found, honestly, not so much to do as a local sysop. I often take a look at RfDs etc but I seldom find anything to do since the current level of spam/vandalism is definitely low. So, I'd like to keep my current position because I think I can be useful during next 'data's phase: I have a certain experience in counterspamming and abusefilter's management. But it's up to Wikidata's community to state whatever I can be useful or not. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:17, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support Not incredibly active, but has still used the tools a bit and plans on sticking around. Two month gap of activity isn't the nicest thing to look at, but I can sympathize with not liking to jump over people just to delete pages. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support --Rschen7754 00:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support --Jasper Deng (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support We'll definitely need him for a bit more 'round here. --Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support Great work. This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Reconfirm A clear plus. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support - Hoo man (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support Not super-active, but for me this is sufficient.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 08:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Support -- Tucoxn (talk) 09:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 11:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Iste (D) 11:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 12:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Support Kartoffeln! --Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 14:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Support ----Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Support Wants to be active in next phases. Conny (talk) 17:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  24.  Support --Paperoastro (talk) 18:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Support -- Yiyi .... (talk!) 00:09, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support --Jitrixis (talk) 12:41, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support --Wholle (talk) 13:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  30.  Support --Daniel749 talk 13:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  31.  Support --Avenue (talk) 02:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  32.  Support --LlamaAl (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  33.  Support Rzuwig► 17:47, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  34.  Support IW 19:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  35.  Support -- feuerst – talk 07:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Obvious  Support Bennylin (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  37.  Support Hurricanefan24 (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Jasper Deng (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Adminship extended indefinitely. Techman224Talk 00:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination statement: (en) I have not been the most active sysop based on the number of edits I have (only somewhat more than 1000). However, I have many logged actions, and intend to remain actively combating vandalism and spam, the latter of which has seemed to increase in the past month or so. I originally ran based on maintenance, and that's what I wish to continue doing. I haven't found much work in terms of content ever since the bots began importing items automatically; in addition a vacation in late December reduced my activity for that period. I really look forward to phase 2, when I believe the project can be truly called Wikidata. I have the technical knowledge to create and manage simple abuse filters, and to manage spam and title blacklists. If re-elected I would continue providing my services and be substantially active. I am available on IRC. (fr-2) Je n'était pas le plus actif administrateur selon le nombre de mes modifications (un peu plus de 1.000), mais j'ai beaucoup des actions administrative, et j'ai l'intention d'être actif en le nettoyage de vandalisme et spam. Mon candidature original était faire de l'entretien et c'est que je voudrais continuer. Je n'avais pas trouvé beaucoup de choses à faire pour le contenu depuis les bots commencaient ici; en outre, un voyage en Decembre a réduit mon activité pour cette période. J'aimera le phase 2, quand on peut appeller le projet vraiment "Wikidata". Je sais comment faire des filtres-abuse simples, et gérer les listes noires et blanches pour le spam et les titres. Si je suis réélu je continuerais à fournir mes services et être sensiblement active. J'utilise IRC.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Support --Rschen7754 00:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Support Yes, yes, and yes.--Sannita - not just another it.wiki sysop 00:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Support although the french translation given above is poor quality. I support Jasper in all activities other than translating to French! This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    For the record, I invite anyone who's better than me at the language to boldly make any corrections. I wouldn't mind.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Weak oppose This was a difficult decision, because Jasper Deng is a genuinely nice guy and he is active. Ultimately, however, I am opposing over this. I can't really find fault with his decision to run for Bureaucrat; I was running at the same time. However starting a thread asking if 'crats were needed immediately following all of the 'crat nominations failing because a significant number of people believe that 'crats were not yet needed strikes me as poor form. Additionally, I spoke with Jasper Deng on IRC yesterday about the issue, and while I didn't explicitly ask for one, he offered no defense for his decision to start that thread. Now, I wouldn't be upset with Jasper Deng retaining the tools, and I'm open to being convinced to changing this to neutral, however right now I think that this is the appropriate column for my vote. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Because there was some ambiguity over the consensus that existed over this, I wished to obtain a clarification.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:00, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Support - Hoo man (talk) 01:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Support -- Bertrand GRONDIN  → (écrire) 05:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Support --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Support Should be fine--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Support -- Tucoxn (talk) 09:02, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Support --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Support --Iste (D) 11:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Support --Stevenliuyi (talk) 12:07, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Weak oppose mostly per Sven (#4). I really didn't like how he acted. I hope he will change a bit because he definitely is a great spam fighter and knows how to use the tools correctly. Kind regards, Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Neutral per Sven. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  14.  Support --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 15:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Support — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Support Spam and vandalism. Conny (talk) 17:57, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  18.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Support -- Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:25, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Neutral per Sven and Vogone. Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 10:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Neutral --Daniel749 talk 13:50, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Support  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Avenue (talk • contribs).
  23.  Neutral Moved from oppose due to Jasper Deng's work as an admin. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  24.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  25.  Neutral - Concerns with temperament, such as telling Stryn that if he didn't accept his bureaucrat nomination all of the votes would be undone, constantly talking about getting rights like bureaucrat or checkuser, etc. But still think he can use the tools well. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  26.  Support Rzuwig► 17:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  27.  Support IW 19:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  28.  Support -- feuerst – talk 07:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  29.  Support Érico Wouters msg 02:01, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Yiyi (talk • contribs • logs)

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Admin right to be removed. Techman224Talk 00:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  1.  Oppose inactive. --Rschen7754 00:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2.  Neutral Not entirely inactive, and curious why user didn't make a nomination statement when they should have seen the messages (inc. on their talk page) that this was going on. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:18, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  3.  Weak oppose per above, also because of limited log actions.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  4.  Neutral per Ajraddatz, but this vote should be read as a default "oppose" if he still hasn't posted a statement by the end of the week. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  5.  Neutral A good admin, but we really can't confirm unless active. This, that and the other (talk) 00:34, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  6.  Oppose --LadyInGrey (talk) 02:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  7.  Oppose not active. --Stryn (talk) 07:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  8.  Oppose --Daniel749 talk 10:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  9.  Oppose --Wiki13 talk 10:42, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  10.  Oppose no nomination statement Vogone (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  11.  Oppose for lack of nomination statement. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  12.  Neutral Nothing against the candidate, actually I'd probably support them if they request the tools again (especially given that they've been using them two days ago), but until then, there is no indication wether they want to keep the tools or not, so neutral. — Arkanosis ✉ 16:15, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  13.  Neutral Wait for statement. Conny (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
  14.  Comment I apologize to all, but in this last month I was been engaged in real life. Perhaps I can return with a new admin nomination in a couple of months. ;-) -- Yiyi .... (talk!) 00:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  15.  Neutral A good user, just not here enough. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  16.  Neutral Good to see he's finally made a statement. I'd be happy to support at a later time if he can put in a few months of activity once his other commitments clear. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  17.  Oppose -- At least for now. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 07:30, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  18.  Oppose Lukas²³ talk in German Contribs 10:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  19.  Oppose --Jitrixis (talk) 12:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  20.  Oppose --LlamaAl (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  21.  Neutral IW 19:25, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  22.  Oppose Lack of activity. Thanks for your efforts. Érico Wouters msg 02:04, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Not at Érico Wouters in specific, but to the last 10 or so voters in general: After the first half dozen opposes, is it really necessary to continue to pile on the opposes? It didn't have a chance of reconfirmation by the time that the 10th comment came around; I feel further pile on is just disrespectful. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:20, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree (also speaking generally, not to Érico). Could we perhaps implement a policy that if an RFA gets 10 opposes without getting any supports, users are asked not to continue opposing unless someone supports it? (Maybe we could also have a rule for a >80% oppose percentage?) Sort of like the convention in high school soccer and lacrosse that you stop shooting once you're a certain number of points ahead. ← My first ever sports analogy on a Wikimedia project, I think. Ugghh. Feels weird. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 05:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    No thanks to formal policies which might need to be changed as the community changes. I think some common sense is ultimately needed here, even if someone just reminds voters that their votes aren't needed since the request won't pass anyways. Ajraddatz (Talk) 12:22, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I oppose the idea of limiting votes. Every user should have the right to decide at his own whether he votes or not. This should not be controlled by a policy. Regards, Vogone (talk) 16:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I, for one, was speaking of it as a matter of courtesy, not policy. Sven Manguard Wha? 23:47, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  23.  Neutral - inactivity. Hurricanefan24 (talk) 15:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm_2013/3&oldid=598953666"