WOW..THAT SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT YOU AND NOT A WORD ABOUT BRIE LARSON.

Agreed OP, who gives a rats a$$ about Capt Marvel returning!

You do realize with Brie Larson returning for End Game, it means the she will be in 2 Marvel movies breaking a billion dollars straight (her only 2 Marvel appearances so far), right?

@Innovator said:

You do realize with Brie Larson returning for End Game, it means the she will be in 2 Marvel movies breaking a billion dollars straight (her only 2 Marvel appearances so far), right?

Yay for her and her potential upcoming paydays. Saw EndGame last night and she's barely given anything to do!

@jorgito2001 said:

@Innovator said:

You do realize with Brie Larson returning for End Game, it means the she will be in 2 Marvel movies breaking a billion dollars straight (her only 2 Marvel appearances so far), right?

Yay for her and her potential upcoming paydays. Saw EndGame last night and she's barely given anything to do!

She did enough to serve the story when they needed to deal with somethings quickly, she is quite op. Did you really want her to do more?

@Innovator said:

You do realize with Brie Larson returning for End Game, it means the she will be in 2 Marvel movies breaking a billion dollars straight (her only 2 Marvel appearances so far), right?

I don't care about arguing about Brie Larson one way or the other but Daisy Ridley, Vin Diesel, Emma Watson and Chris Pratt have all been in multiple billion dollar movies. Not really sure therefore what that means in terms of being a stamp of quality 🤔

@The Midi-chlorian Count said:

@Innovator said:

You do realize with Brie Larson returning for End Game, it means the she will be in 2 Marvel movies breaking a billion dollars straight (her only 2 Marvel appearances so far), right?

I don't care about arguing about Brie Larson one way or the other but Daisy Ridley, Vin Diesel, Emma Watson and Chris Pratt have all be in multiple billion dollar movies. Not really sure therefore what that means in terms of being a stamp of quality 🤔

So you're saying that the first two Guardians of the Galaxy movies earned a billion?

ALL OF THOSE ACTORS HAVE GIVEN QUALITY PERFORMANCES IN QUALITY FILMS...SO I THINK YOURE PROVING THE POINT YOUE ARGUING AGAINST.

@autoexec.batman said:

@The Midi-chlorian Count said:

@Innovator said:

You do realize with Brie Larson returning for End Game, it means the she will be in 2 Marvel movies breaking a billion dollars straight (her only 2 Marvel appearances so far), right?

I don't care about arguing about Brie Larson one way or the other but Daisy Ridley, Vin Diesel, Emma Watson and Chris Pratt have all be in multiple billion dollar movies. Not really sure therefore what that means in terms of being a stamp of quality 🤔

So you're saying that the first two Guardians of the Galaxy movies earned a billion?

No, I didn't say that. Didn't mention them.

[@The Midi-chlorian Count] No, I didn't say that. Didn't mention them.

That's exactly my point, that you're being a dumbass.

The claim was that Brie Larson started in two movies that earned one billion IN HER FIRST TWO MCU FILMS.

Then you responded by saying "so what, Chris Pratt did the same thing" but he did not. Chris Pratt did not star in two movies that earned one billion IN HIS FIRST TWO MCU FILMS. Your brilliant "analogy" wasn't even close to being analogous and all you did was make yourself look like a dumbass.

You are clearly responding to posts that you either don't read or don't understand.

First of all I'm going to say I'm really disappointed in you @autoexec.batman. I remember you from back in the old imdb days and I had in mind that you were a pretty decent, considerate poster. Now I'm reading crap from you like calling me a dumbass and saying garbage like "responding to posts that you either don't read or don't understand". This site's been going downhill with just a few trolls seemingly feeding off each other or whoever else they can intimidate whenever they "step on their territory". Shame that it's seems you're actually in that number too.

As to why what you've written is absolute rubbish, here's a link to the page I was reading before I made my post last night:- https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/11/the-highest-grossing-movies-of-all-time.html

You see Daisy Ridley's Star Wars films in there? Vin Diesel's Fast & Furious efforts? Emma Watson's Harry Potter and Disney live action cash grab? How about Chris Pratt's Jurassic World films? Do you seem THEM?

Now go back and have another read of my initial post in reply to @Innovator - I said just two things, 1. I had no interest in arguing about Brie Larson, and 2. I listed actors, including Chris Pratt, who had been in multiple billion dollar films and questioned therefore whether box office was any barometer of an actor's quality. That. Was. It.

So unless you can show me somewhere were I actually referenced Guardians of the Galaxy (here's a clue - I didn't) that's the problem when you decide to act like a complete asshole to a total stranger on a forum, it leaves you looking like an idiot. e.g. talking about analogies that you've pulled out of thin air. Like I said at the start here though it's a shame because I really thought you were a decent poster. I'll leave you to reflect on your own closing comment:-

You are clearly responding to posts that you either don't read or don't understand.

@The Midi-chlorian Count said:

First of all I'm going to say I'm really disappointed in you @autoexec.batman. I remember you from back in the old imdb days and I had in mind that you were a pretty decent, considerate poster. Now I'm reading crap from you like calling me a dumbass and saying garbage like "responding to posts that you either don't read or don't understand". This site's been going downhill with just a few trolls seemingly feeding off each other or whoever else they can intimidate whenever they "step on their territory". Shame that it's seems you're actually in that number too.

As to why what you've written is absolute rubbish, here's a link to the page I was reading before I made my post last night:- https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2018/11/the-highest-grossing-movies-of-all-time.html

You see Daisy Ridley's Star Wars films in there? Vin Diesel's Fast & Furious efforts? Emma Watson's Harry Potter and Disney live action cash grab? How about Chris Pratt's Jurassic World films? Do you seem THEM?

Now go back and have another read of my initial post in reply to @Innovator - I said just two things, 1. I had no interest in arguing about Brie Larson, and 2. I listed actors, including Chris Pratt, who had been in multiple billion dollar films and questioned therefore whether box office was any barometer of an actor's quality. That. Was. It.

So unless you can show me somewhere were I actually referenced Guardians of the Galaxy (here's a clue - I didn't) that's the problem when you decide to act like a complete asshole to a total stranger on a forum, it leaves you looking like an idiot. e.g. talking about analogies that you've pulled out of thin air. Like I said at the start here though it's a shame because I really thought you were a decent poster. I'll leave you to reflect on your own closing comment:-

You are clearly responding to posts that you either don't read or don't understand.

I think it would have more sense if you went with:

• John Kani (first 2 MCU movies)
• Danai Gurira and Florence Kasumba (first 3 MCU movies)
• Chadwick Boseman (first 4 MCU movies)

But then they're quality actors aren't they?

Well it may have done had I actually been talking about the MCU at all...

Problem is that there was a jumping assumption made (followed by some completely unnecessary vitriol) which I still don't even understand how was possible given I also mentioned Daisy Ridley and Emma Watson who - as far as I'm aware - haven't starred in ANY MCU films at all.

@The Midi-chlorian Count said:

Well it may have done had I actually been talking about the MCU at all...

Problem is that there was a jumping assumption made (followed by some completely unnecessary vitriol) which I still don't even understand how was possible given I also mentioned Daisy Ridley and Emma Watson who - as far as I'm aware - haven't started in ANY MCU films at all.

I believe their argument fell more into your point is mute as my post you were responding to specifically was pointing out that Brie Larson will only appear great to Marvel/Disney as her only roles in the MCU both garnered the company a billion dollars each which only the other 4 actors above have incidentally accomplished, and in their (and the shareholders) eyes would equate her to being a quality/box office garnering actress (also her academy award would do that as well).

Well possibly but that argument itself is *moot given - as I've pointed out multiple times now - I made no reference to the MCU at all. That was picked out of thin air by someone looking to troll. Which is why, this:-

Then you responded by saying "so what, Chris Pratt did the same thing" but he did not. Chris Pratt did not star in two movies that earned one billion IN HIS FIRST TWO MCU FILMS. Your brilliant "analogy" wasn't even close to being analogous and all you did was make yourself look like a dumbass.

was a completely laughable huge reach.