In Iran, the Big Winner Is None of the Above
A second round between an extremist and a reformist will put the logic of boycott to the test.
![A white-haired man stands at a lectern, speaking to a crowd of people in front of a mural featuring his face.](https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/rOGQz7V_dvcheFBsU_CTqkb9NXs=/1050x0:3750x2700/80x80/media/img/mt/2024/07/HR_16224141/original.jpg)
A second round between an extremist and a reformist will put the logic of boycott to the test.
The presidential candidates can’t seem to talk about foreign policy without talking about him.
Khamenei has set the stage for Iran’s presidential election.
For the first time, Iranian officials are openly threatening to build a nuclear weapon—and even intimating that they already have.
If the Iranian president turns out to have lost his life in a helicopter crash, it will set off a fierce scramble for power.
The ideologues are winning a decades-long battle over Tehran’s foreign policy.
The people of Iran know that their main enemy is at home.
A stabbing in London has energized those it was likely meant to silence.
If socialists want to be a political force in America, they need to form coalitions, defend democracy, and change real people’s lives.
By tying Iran’s fate to an unruly Axis, Khamenei has endangered his country and put it at serious risk of war.