Hazard Analysis
Hazard Analysis
Hazard Analysis
Gempa bumi 1 1 1 3 2 2 2
Gelombang pasang 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Suhu Ekstrem 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kekeringan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Banjir, Eksternal 1 1 1 3 1 1 1
Kebaran 3 1 1 3 0 0 0
Tanah longsor 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Genangan Bendungan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gunung berapi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Epidemic 1 3 0 2 2 2 2
Relative threat*
0 - 100%
20%
0%
0%
0%
15%
28%
0%
0%
0%
20%
2%
Kegagalan Transportasi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Banjir, Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Paparan B3, Internal 3 1 2 3 2 2 2 67%
Kekurangan Pasokan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Kerusakan Struktural 1 3 3 3 2 2 3 30%
AVERAGE SCORE 0.79 1.21 0.89 1.84 1.26 1.26 1.21 11%
Terorisme, Biologis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Situasi VIP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Penculikan Bayi 3 3 0 3 1 1 1
Situasi Penyanderaan 1 1 0 3 2 2 2
Aksi Demo 2 2 1 3 3 1 2
Ancaman Bom 2 3 3 3 1 1 1
Relative threat*
0 - 100%
37%
37%
0%
0%
50%
19%
41%
44%
0%
44%
21%
Insiden B3/Korban
Hazard Material (Dari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
kejadian
yang pernah terjadi di
RS Anda dengan> = 5
korban)
Paparan Radiologis, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Eksternal
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Terorisme, Radiologis
AVERAGE 0.44 1.11 0.00 0.11 0.89 0.89 0.89 3%
Hazmat
Natural
Human
Probability 0.13 0.26 0.47 0.15 0.24
1.00
Relative Threat to Facility
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Natural Technological Human Hazmat
1.00
0.90
Relative Impact on Facility
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Probability Severity
677177748.xlsx Summary
INSTRUCTIONS
Evaluate potential for event and response among the following categories using
the hazard specific scale.
Issues to consider for probability include, but are not limited to:
1 Known risk
2 Historical data
3 Manufacturer/vendor statistics
Issues to consider for response include, but are not limited to:
1 Time to marshal an on-scene response
2 Scope of response capability
3 Historical evaluation of response success
Issues to consider for human impact include, but are not limited to:
1 Potential for staff death or injury
2 Potential for patient death or injury
Issues to consider for property impact include, but are not limited to:
1 Cost to replace
2 Cost to set up temporary replacement
3 Cost to repair
Issues to consider for business impact include, but are not limited to:
1 Business interruption
2 Employees unable to report to work
3 Customers unable to reach facility
4 Company in violation of contractual agreements
5 Imposition of fines and penalties or legal costs
6 Interruption of critical supplies
7 Interruption of product distribution
Issues to consider for preparedness include, but are not limited to:
1 Status of current plans
2 Training status
3 Insurance
4 Availability of back-up systems
5 Community resources
Issues to consider for internal resources include, but are not limited to:
1 Types of supplies on hand
2 Volume of supplies on hand
3 Staff availability
4 Coordination with MOB's
Issues to consider for external resources include, but are not limited to:
1 Types of agreements with community agencies
2 Coordination with local and state agencies
3 Coordination with proximal health care facilities
4 Coordination with treatment specific facilities
Complete all worksheets including Natural, Technological, Human and Hazmat. The summary
section will automatically provide your specific and overall relative threat.
HAZARD AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS
RSUD CILINCING
2018
BAB IV
CONCLUSION
Identifikasi dikeluarkan sebagai referensi untuk semua departemen di RSUD Cilincing dalam bermeditasi keselamata
Ketika program implementasi didirikan kendala dan kesulitan yang tidak bisa ia dilaksanakan sesuai kondisi yang seb
Kejadian yang paling besar kemungkinan terjadi bencana di RSUD Cilinicing adalah gempa bumi, banjir, penculikan
Dr. Rafael
Ketua
temen di RSUD Cilincing dalam bermeditasi keselamatan pasien dan keamanan, pengunjung dan bekerja selama 2018.
n yang tidak bisa ia dilaksanakan sesuai kondisi yang sebenarnya jadi kita dari tim K3RS permintaan positif saran sebagai evalua
RSUD Cilinicing adalah gempa bumi, banjir, penculikan bayi, dan kebakaran
Diketahui
Director
Dr. Netty Siahaan, M.K.M
NIP 196104241987112001
bekerja selama 2018.
an positif saran sebagai evaluasi yang penting dari program dilaksanakan dan membuat referensi untuk melakukan program perb
k melakukan program perbaikan untuk tahun depan.