skip to main content
10.1145/3563137.3563145acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

A model for the design of immersive learning enactments for students with disabilities: A literature review-based validation for students with intellectual disability

Published: 25 May 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Immersive technologies offer benefits with great potential in special education. A limited number of publications have been found regarding the design of immersive educational environments for special education and especially for students with disabilities. This study proposes MILES-D, a model for the design of effective immersive educational environments for students with disabilities. MILES-D comprises two dimensions by incorporating the affordances of immersive technologies and the Universal Design for Learning model, to propose a series of learning tasks afforded in immersive environments for students with disabilities. A systematic literature review regarding students with intellectual disability revealed that researchers do not seem to use any model for the design of their educational environments. Nevertheless, studies incorporating certain affordances, develop immersive environments which follow the proposed by MILES-D tasks. This is a first indication that MILES-D works and empirical studies are needed to validate it.

References

[1]
Shu Chen Cheng and Chiu Lin Lai. 2019. Facilitating learning for students with special needs: a review of technology-supported special education studies. Journal of Computers in Education 2019 7:2 7, 2 (December 2019), 131–153.
[2]
Mirfa Manzoor and Vivian Vimarlund. 2018. Digital technologies for social inclusion of individuals with disabilities. Health and Technology 8, 5 (November 2018), 377–390.
[3]
H.G. Jeya Harish, R.Krishna Kumar, and B. William Dharma Raja. 2013. Bringing ICT to Teach Science Education for Students With Learning Difficulties. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology 8, 4 (May 2013), 1–5.
[4]
Cecilia Avila-Garzon, Jorge Bacca-Acosta, Kinshuk, Joan Duarte, and Juan Betancourt. 2021. Augmented Reality in Education: An Overview of Twenty-Five Years of Research. Contemporary Educational Technology 13, 3 (April 2021), ep302.
[5]
Matt Bower, Cathie Howe, Nerida McCredie, Austin Robinson, and David Grover. 2014. Augmented Reality in education – cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International 51, 1 (March 2014), 1–15.
[6]
Nabil Almalki. 2016. What is the Best Strategy “Evidence-Based Practice” to Teach Literacy Skills for Students with Multiple Disabilities? A Systematic Review. World Journal of Education 6, 6 (2016), 18–30.
[7]
Hasan Köse and Nevin Güner-Yildiz. 2021. Augmented reality (AR) as a learning material in special needs education. Education and Information Technologies 26, 2 (March 2021), 1921–1936.
[8]
Olga Mantziou, Nikiforos M. Papachristos, and Tassos A. Mikropoulos. 2018. Learning activities as enactments of learning affordances in MUVEs: A review-based classification. Education and Information Technologies 23, 4 (July 2018), 1737–1765.
[9]
Barney Dalgarno and Mark J.W. Lee. 2010. What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 1 (January 2010), 10–32.
[10]
Adam Carreon, Sean J. Smith, Maggie Mosher, Kavita Rao, and Amber Rowland. 2020. A Review of Virtual Reality Intervention Research for Students With Disabilities in K–12 Settings: Journal of Special Education Technology 37, 1 (October 2020), 82–99.
[11]
Kavita Rao, Min Wook Ok, and Brian R. Bryant. 2014. A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models: Remedial and special education 35, 3 (February 2014), 153–166.
[12]
Jamelh Jamelh Moshbab AlRawi and Mohammed Ali AlKahtani. 2021. Universal design for learning for educating students with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities (September 2021).
[13]
Matt C. Howard and Maggie M. Davis. 2022. A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of mixed reality rehabilitation programs: Investigating design characteristics of augmented reality and augmented virtuality. Computers in Human Behavior 130, (May 2022), 107197.
[14]
Council for Exceptional Children. 2014. Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special Education. TEACHING Exceptional Children 46, 6 (July 2014), 206–212.
[15]
American Psychiatric Association. 2022. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR.
[16]
Jairo Quintero, Silvia Baldiris, Rainer Rubira, Jhoni Cerón, and Gloria Velez. 2019. Augmented reality in educational inclusion. A systematic review on the last decade. Frontiers in Psychology 10, AUG (2019), 1835.
[17]
Panos Mallidis-Malessas, Georgia Iatraki, and Tassos Anastasios Mikropoulos. 2021. Teaching Physics to Students With Intellectual Disabilities Using Digital Learning Objects: Journal of Special Education Technology (December 2021).
[18]
Guido Makransky and Gustav B. Petersen. 2021. The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): a Theoretical Research-Based Model of Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality. Educational Psychology Review 33, 3 (September 2021), 937–958.
[19]
David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart, and PRISMA-P Group. 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews 4, 1 (2015), 1.
[20]
F. Arici, P. Yildirim, Şeyma Caliklar, and Rabia M. Yilmaz. 2019. Research trends in the use of augmented reality in science education: Content and bibliometric mapping analysis. Computers & Education 142, (December 2019), 103647.
[21]
Laurianne Sitbon, Ross Brown, and Lauren Fell. 2019. Turning Heads: Designing Engaging Immersive Video Experiences to Support People with Intellectual Disability When Learning Everyday Living Skills. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171–182.
[22]
Lydia and Bustillo Andres Checa David and Ramon. 2019. Virtual Reality Travel Training Simulator for People with Intellectual Disabilities. In Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Computer Graphics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 385–393.
[23]
Abel Vargas, Paloma Díaz, and Telmo Zarraonandia. 2020. Using Virtual Reality and Music in Cognitive Disability Therapy. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Association for Computing Machinery, 1–9.
[24]
Laura Freina, Rosa Bottino, and Mauro Tavella. 2016. From e-learning to VR-learning: an example of learning in an immersive virtual world. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 12, 2 (May 2016).
[25]
Francesco and Piérart Geneviève and Khaled Omar Abou and Mugellini Elena and Wunderle Dominique Cherix Robin and Carrino. 2020. Training Pedestrian Safety Skills in Youth with Intellectual Disabilities Using Fully Immersive Virtual Reality - A Feasibility Study. In HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. Driving Behavior, Urban and Smart Mobility, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 161–175.
[26]
Xiao Wang, Xuan Liang, Junyi Yao, Tingzhao Wang, and Jianxin Feng. 2021. A study of the use of virtual reality headsets in Chinese adolescents with intellectual disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities (2021).
[27]
Beatrice Aruanno, Franca Garzotto, Emanuele Torelli, and Francesco Vona. 2018. HoloLearn: Wearable Mixed Reality for People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders (NDD). In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 40–51.
[28]
Mirko Gelsomini, Franca Garzotto, Daniele Montesano, and Daniele Occhiuto. 2016. Wildcard: A wearable virtual reality storytelling tool for children with intellectual developmental disability. In 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 5188–5191.
[29]
Christine Roberts-Yates and David Silvera-Tawil. 2019. Better education opportunities for students with autism and intellectual disabilities through digital technology. International Journal of Special Education 34, 1 (2019), 197–210.
[30]
Yang Tianwu, Zhou Changjiu, and Shen Jiayao. 2016. Virtual Reality Based Independent Travel Training System for Children with Intellectual Disability. In 2016 European Modelling Symposium (EMS), 143–148.
[31]
Ross Brown, Laurianne Sitbon, Lauren Fell, Stewart Koplick, Chris Beaumont, and Margot Brereton. 2016. Design Insights into Embedding Virtual Reality Content into Life Skills Training for People with Intellectual Disability. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (OzCHI ’16), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 581–585.
[32]
Nicolas Valencia-Jimenez, Sheila da Luz, Dayse Santos, Mariane Souza, Teodiano Bastos, and Anselmo Frizera. 2020. The effect of smart mirror environment on proprioception factors of children with Down syndrome. Research on Biomedical Engineering 36, 2 (2020), 187–195.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A model for the design of immersive learning enactments for students with disabilities: A literature review-based validation for students with intellectual disability

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DSAI '22: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion
        August 2022
        237 pages
        ISBN:9781450398077
        DOI:10.1145/3563137
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 25 May 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        DSAI 2022

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 17 of 23 submissions, 74%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)165
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
        Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all

        View Options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Login options

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media