skip to main content
10.1145/3173386.3177023acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

The Effects of the Physical Contact in the Functional Intimate Distance on User's Acceptance toward Robots

Published: 01 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

We investigated the effects of physical contact of robots on the user's acceptance in the functional intimate distance. We conducted a two (robot interaction types: interaction with physical contact vs. interaction with a tool) within-participants experiment (N=18). This study was a video-based observation study. According to the experimental results, the evaluation of participants on the empathy and sociability of the robot was not affected by physical contact in the functional intimate zone. On the other hand, the participants felt secure and perceived that the robot was knowledgeable when the robot measured the patient's temperature with a thermometer instead of its hand.

References

[1]
Breazeal, C. 2003. Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1--2), pp.119--155.
[2]
Zhao, S. 2006. Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society, 8(3), pp.405--406.
[3]
Mackey, R. A., Diemer, M.A., and O'Brien, B.A. 2000. Psychological intimacy in the lasting relationships of heterosexual and same-gender couples, Sex Roles, 43(3--4), pp.201--227.
[4]
Schroeder, J., Fishbach, A., Schein, C., and Gray, K. 2017. Functional intimacy: needing-but not wanting-the touch of a stranger. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 113(6), pp.910--924.
[5]
Hall, E. T. 1966. The hidden dimension. NY: Anchor Books.
[6]
Mashek, D. J. and Aron, A. 2008. Handbook of closeness and intimacy. NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
[7]
Kim, Y. and Mutlu, B. 2014. How social distance shapes human--robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(12), pp.783--795.
[8]
Kim, Y., Kwak, S. S. and Kim, M. S. 2013. Am I Acceptable to You? Effect of a Robot's Verbal Language Forms on People's Social Distance from Robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), pp.1091--1101.
[9]
Vernie, https://shop.lego.com/en-US/BOOST-Creative-Toolbox-17101 (Accessed 09. Jan. 2018).
[10]
Macedo, A., Cavadas, L. F., Sousa, M., Pires, P., Santos, J. A., and Machado, A. 2011. Empathy in family medicine, Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral, 27(6), pp.527--532.
[11]
Powers, A., Kiesler S. 2006, The Advisor Robot: Tracing People's Mental Model from a Robot's Physical Attributes. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction, ACM, pp. 218--225.
[12]
Bartneck, C., Kuli, D., Croft, E., and Zoghbi, S. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics, 1(1), pp. 71--81.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The Effects of the Physical Contact in the Functional Intimate Distance on User's Acceptance toward Robots

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      March 2018
      431 pages
      ISBN:9781450356152
      DOI:10.1145/3173386
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 March 2018

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. empathy
      2. functional intimacy
      3. human-robot interaction
      4. knowledgeableness
      5. physical contact
      6. safety
      7. sociability
      8. social distance

      Qualifiers

      • Abstract

      Funding Sources

      • Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea)

      Conference

      HRI '18
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 206 submissions, 24%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media