skip to main content
research-article

Enhancing Semantic Expressivity in the Cultural Heritage Domain: Exposing the Zeri Photo Archive as Linked Open Data

Published: 31 July 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Describing cultural heritage objects from the perspective of Linked Open Data (LOD) is not a trivial task. The process often requires not only choosing pertinent ontologies but also developing new models that preserve the most information and express the semantic power of cultural heritage data. Indeed, data managed in archives, libraries, and museums are complex objects themselves, which require a deep reflection on even nonconventional conceptual models. Starting from these considerations, this article describes a research project: to expose the vastness of one of the most important collections of European cultural heritage, the Zeri Photo Archive, as LOD. We describe here the steps we undertook to this end. First, we developed two ad hoc ontologies for describing all issues not completely covered by existent models (the F Entry and the OA Entry Ontology). Then we mapped into RDF the descriptive elements used in the current Zeri Photo Archive catalog, converting into CIDOC CRM and into the two new aforementioned models the source data based on the Italian content standards Scheda F (photography entry, in English) and Scheda OA (work of art entry, in English). Finally, we created an RDF dataset of the output of the mapping that could show a result capable of demonstrating the complexity of our scenario.

References

[1]
Murtha Baca. 2006. Cataloguing Cultural Objects: A Guide to Describing Cultural Works and Their Images. American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
[2]
Murtha Baca and Sherman Clarke. 2007. FRBR and works of art, architecture, and material culture. In Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools, A. Taylor (Ed.). Libraries Unlimited, Westport, CT, 227–242.
[3]
Lina Bountouri and Manolis Gergatsoulis. 2011a. Mapping encoded archival description to CIDOC-CRM. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Digital Information Management. 8--25.
[4]
Lina Bountouri and Manolis Gergatsoulis. 2011b. The semantic mapping of archival metadata to the CIDOC-CRM ontology. Journal of Archival Organization 9, 3--4, 174--207.
[5]
Karen Coyle. 2016. FRBR, Before and After: A Look at Our Bibliographic Models. American Library Association, Chicago, IL.
[6]
Marilena Daquino and Francesca Tomasi. 2015. Historical Context (HiCO): A conceptual model for describing context information of cultural heritage objects. In Metadata and Semantics Research: Communication in Computer and Information Science 544, E. Garoufallou, R. J. Hartley, and P. Gaitanou (Eds.). Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 424--436.
[7]
Victor De Boer, Jan Wielemaker, Judith van Gent, Michiel Hildebrand, Antoine Isaac, Jacco van Ossenbruggen, and Guus Schreiber. 2012. Supporting Linked Data production for cultural heritage institutes: The Amsterdam Museum case study. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7295. Springer, 733--747.
[8]
Martin Doerr. 2010. The Europeana Data Model (EDM) mapping to CIDOC-CRM. Retrieved June 22, 2017, from http://old.cidoc-crm.org/docs/CRM-EDM_FRBR.ppt.
[9]
Europeana. 2016. Definition of the Europeana Data Model v5.2.7. Retrieved May 27, 2017, from http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Technical_requirements/EDM_Documentation/EDM_Definition_v5.2.7_042016.pdf.
[10]
Riccardo Falco, Aldo Gangemi, Silvio Peroni, and Fabio Vitali. 2014. Modelling OWL ontologies with Graffoo. In The Semantic Web: ESWC 2014 Satellite Events. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8798. Springer, 320--325.
[11]
Achille Felicetti, Tiziana Scarselli, Maria Letizia Mancinelli, and Franco Niccolucci. 2013. Mapping ICCD archaeological data to CIDOC-CRM: The RA schema. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Practical Experiences with CIDOC-CRM and Its Extensions. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1117/paper2.pdf.
[12]
Mariano Fernández Asunción Gómez-Pérez, and Natalia Juristo. 1997. METHONTOLOGY: From ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Proceedings of the AAAI 1997 Spring Symposium. 33--40.
[13]
Ciro Mattia Gonano, Francesca Mambelli, Silvio Peroni, Francesca Tomasi, and Fabio Vitali. 2014. Zeri e LODE: Extracting the Zeri Photo Archive to Linked Open Data: Formalizing the conceptual model. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’14). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 289--298.
[14]
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 2009. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Retrieved June 22, 2017, from www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf.
[15]
Antoine Isaac, William Waites, Jeff Young, and Marcia Zeng. 2011. Datasets, Value Vocabularies, and Metadata Element Sets. Retrieved May 28, 2017, from http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-vocabdataset/.
[16]
Patrick Le Boeuf, Martin Doerr, Christian Emil Ore, and Stephen Stead. 2015. Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_6.2.1.pdf.
[17]
Timothy Lebo, Satya Sahoo, and Deborah McGuinness. 2013. PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. Retrieved May 28, 2017, from https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/.
[18]
Julia Marden, Carolyn Li-Madeo, Noreen Whysel, and Jeffrey Edelstein. 2013. Linked Open Data for cultural heritage: Evolution of an information technology. In Proceedings of the 31stACM International Conference on Design of Communication. ACM, New York, NY, 107--112.
[19]
Boris Motik, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Bijan Parsia. 2012. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax (Second Edition). W3C Recommendation 11 December 2012. Retrieved May 28, 2017, from http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/.
[20]
Michele Pasin and John Bradley. 2015. Factoid-based prosopography and computer ontologies: Towards an integrated approach. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30, 1, 86--97.
[21]
Silvio Peroni. 2017. A simplified agile methodology for ontology development. In Proceedings of the 13th OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop and the 5th OWL Reasoner Evaluation Workshop (OWLED-ORE’16).
[22]
Silvio Peroni and David Shotton. 2012. FaBiO and CiTO: Ontologies for describing bibliographic resources and citations. Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 17, 33--43.
[23]
Silvio Peroni, David Shotton, and Fabio Vitali. 2012. Scholarly publishing and the Linked Data: Describing roles, statuses, temporal and contextual extents. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Semantic Systems (i-Semantics’12). ACM, New York, NY, 9--16.
[24]
Inge Reist, David Farneth, R. Samuel Stein, and Remigius Weda. 2015. An Introduction to PHAROS: Aggregating Free Access to 31 Million Digitized Images and Counting. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from http://network.icom.museum/fileadmin/user_upload/minisites/cidoc/BoardMeetings/CIDOC_PHAROS_Farneth-Stein-Weda_1.pdf.
[25]
Max Schmachtenberg, Chris Bizer, and Heiko Paulheim. 2014. State of the LOD Cloud 2014 (Version 0.4). Retrieved May 28, 2017, from http://linkeddatacatalog.dws.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/state/.
[26]
Richard P. Smiraglia, Pat Riva, and Maja Umer. 2013. The FRBR Family of Conceptual Models: Toward a Linked Bibliographic Future. Routledge, New York, NY.
[27]
Pedro Szekely, Craig A. Knoblock, Fengyu Yang, Xuming Zhu, Eleanor E. Fink, Rachel Allen, and Georgina Goodlander. 2013. Connecting the Smithsonian American Art Museum to the Linked Data cloud. In The Semantic Web: Semantics and Big Data. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7882. Springer, 593--607.
[28]
Mike Uschold. 1995. Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing. 74--82.
[29]
Seth Van Hooland and Ruben Verborgh. 2014. Linked Data for Libraries, Archives and Museums: How to Clean, Link and Publish Your Metadata. American Library Association, Washington, DC.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 10, Issue 4
October 2017
126 pages
ISSN:1556-4673
EISSN:1556-4711
DOI:10.1145/3129537
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 July 2017
Accepted: 01 January 2017
Revised: 01 September 2016
Received: 01 April 2016
Published in JOCCH Volume 10, Issue 4

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Scheda F
  2. Scheda OA
  3. mapping CIDOC CRM

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media