skip to main content
10.1145/2160673.2160696acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesictdConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Power to the peers: authority of source effects for a voice-based agricultural information service in rural India

Published: 12 March 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Online communities enable people to easily connect and share knowledge across geographies. Mobile phones can enable billions of new users in emerging countries to participate in these online communities. In India, where social hierarchy is important, users may over-value institutionally-recognized authorities relative to peer-sourced content. We tested this hypothesis through a controlled experiment of source authority effects on a voice-based agricultural information service for farmers in Gujarat, India. 305 farmers were sent seven agricultural tips via automated phone calls over a two-week period. The same seven tips were each voice-recorded by two university scientists and two peer farmers. Participants received a preview of the tip from a randomly assigned source via the automated call, and played the remainder of the tip by calling a dedicated phone number. Participants called the follow-up number significantly more often when the tip preview was recorded by a peer than a scientist. On the other hand, in interviews conducted both before and after the experiment, a majority of farmers maintained that they preferred receiving information from scientists. This stated preference may have been expressing the more socially acceptable response. We interpret our experimental results as a demonstration of the demand for peer-based agricultural information dissemination. We conclude with design implications for peer-to-peer information services for rural communities in India.

References

[1]
Amazon Mechanical Turk. Retrieved July 7, 2009 from http://www.mturk.com.
[2]
A. Appadurai. Putting hierarchy in its place. Cultural Anthropology, 1988.
[3]
R. Birner and J. R. Anderson. How to make agricultural extension demand-driven? Technical report, International Food Policy Research Insititute, November 2007.
[4]
S. Chaiken and D. Maheswaran. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3):460--473, 1994.
[5]
R. B. Cialdini, R. R. Reno, and C. A. Kallgren. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990.
[6]
L. Dumont and M. Sainsbury. Homo hierarchicus. University of Chicago Press, 1970.
[7]
R. J. Fisher. Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 1993.
[8]
R. Gandhi, R. Veeraraghavan, K. Toyama, and V. Ramprasad. Digital green: Participatory video and mediated instruction for agricultural extension. Information Technologies & International Development, 5(1), 2009.
[9]
Honey Bee Network. Retrieved July 22, 2011 from http://www.honeybee.org.
[10]
S. Kitayama, S. Duffy, T. Kawamura, and J. Larsen. Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at a new look. Psychological Science, 2003.
[11]
R. Levine, S. Sato, T. Hashimoto, and J. Verma. Love and marriage in eleven cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1995.
[12]
W. Maddux and M. Yuki. The "ripple effect": Cultural differences in perceptions of the consequences of events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2006.
[13]
L. Mamykina, B. Manoim, M. Mittal, G. Hripcsak, and B. Hartmann. Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '11, pages 2857--2866, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[14]
M. Mines. Conceptualizing the person: Hierarchical society and individual autonomy in india. American Anthropologist, 1988.
[15]
V. Parmar, D. Keyson, and C. de Bont. Persuasive technology to shape social beliefs: A case of persuasive health information systems for rural women in india. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 2009.
[16]
N. Patel, D. Chittamuru, A. Jain, P. Dave, and T. S. Parikh. Avaaj otalo: a field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural india. In CHI '10: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 733--742, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[17]
D. L. Paulhus. Measurement and control of response bias. measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. Measures of social psychological attitudes, 1991.
[18]
R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19(3):123--205, 1986.
[19]
D. Ramachandran, J. Canny, P. D. Das, and E. Cutrell. Mobile-izing health workers in rural india. In CHI '10: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1889--1898, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[20]
S. W. Raudenbush and A. S. Bryk. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications, 2002.
[21]
K. Savani, M. W. Morris, and N. Naidu. Deference in indiansâĂŹ decision making: Introjected goals or injunctive norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2011.
[22]
J. B. P. Sinha, T. N. Sinha, J. Verma, and R. B. N. Sinha. Collectivism coexisting with individualism: an indian scenario. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2001.
[23]
S. R. Sterling and N. Rangaswamy. Constructing informed consent in ict4d research. In Proc. IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 2010.
[24]
C. Storti. Speaking of India: Bridging the communication gap when working with Indians. Intercultural Press, 2007.
[25]
R. Sulaiman V. Innovations in agricultural extension in india. Technical report, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2003.
[26]
J. Verma and H. Triandis. The measurement of collectivism in india. merging past, present, and future in cross-cultural psychology. Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1999.
[27]
P. H. White and S. G. Harkins. Race of source effects in the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5):790--807, 1994.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICTD '12: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
March 2012
374 pages
ISBN:9781450310451
DOI:10.1145/2160673
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • UNESCO
  • Microsoft: Microsoft
  • IDRC: International Development Research Centre
  • Royal Holloway, University of London: Royal Holloway, University of London

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 March 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. India
  2. agriculture
  3. authority
  4. dissemination
  5. human-computer interaction
  6. mobile
  7. online community
  8. peer
  9. rural development
  10. source

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ICTD '12
Sponsor:
  • Microsoft
  • IDRC
  • Royal Holloway, University of London

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 22 of 116 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 21 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media