skip to main content
10.1145/2631775.2631790acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshtConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Why you follow: a classification scheme for twitter follow links

Published: 01 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Twitter is used for various purposes, such as, information publishing/gathering, open discussions, and personal communications. As a result, there are various types of follow links. In this paper, we propose a scheme for classifying follow links according to the followers' intention. The scheme consists of three axes: user-orientation, content-orientation, and mutuality. The combination of these three axes can classify most major types of follow links. Our experimental results suggest that the type of a follow link does not solely depend on the type of the followee nor solely on the type of the follower. The results also suggest that the proposed three axes are highly independent of one another.

References

[1]
L. Backstrom and J. Leskovec. Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. In Proc. of WSDM, pages 635--644, 2011.
[2]
J. Cheng, D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. M. Kleinberg. Predicting reciprocity in social networks. In Proc. of IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pages 49--56, Oct. 2011.
[3]
Z. Chu, S. Gianvecchio, H. Wang, and S. Jajodia. Who is tweeting on twitter: human, bot, or cyborg? In Proc. of ACSAC, pages 21--30, 2010.
[4]
J. Hannon, M. Bennett, and B. Smyth. Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In Proc. of RecSys, pages 199--206, 2010.
[5]
M. Hasan and M. Zaki. A survey of link prediction in social networks. In Social Network Data Analytics, pages 243--275. Springer, 2011.
[6]
J. E. Hopcroft, T. Lou, and J. Tang. Who will follow you back?: Reciprocal relationship prediction. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 1137--1146, Oct. 2011.
[7]
A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. Proc. of KDD, pages 56--65, 2007.
[8]
M. Kim, D. Newth, and P. Christen. Modeling dynamics of meta-populations with a probabilistic approach: Global diffusion in social media. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 489--498, 2013.
[9]
B. Krishnamurthy, P. Gill, and M. Arlitt. A few chirps about twitter. In Proc. of WOSP, pages 19--24, 2008.
[10]
J. Kunegis, A. Lommatzsch, and C. Bauckhage. The slashdot zoo: mining a social network with negative edges. In Proc. of WWW, pages 741--750, 2009.
[11]
H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proc. of WWW, pages 591--600, 2010.
[12]
K. Lee, J. Caverlee, and S. Webb. The social honeypot project: protecting online communities from spammers. In Proc. of WWW, pages 1139--1140, 2010.
[13]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In Proc. of WWW, pages 641--650, 2010.
[14]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Signed networks in social media. In Proc. of CHI, pages 1361--1370, 2010.
[15]
D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. M. Kleinberg. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In Proc. of WWW, pages 695--704, 2011.
[16]
E. Tan, L. Guo, S. Chen, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhao. Unik: Unsupervised social network spam detection. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 479--488, 2013.
[17]
S. Wu, J. M. Hofman, W. A. Mason, and D. J. Watts. Who says what to whom on twitter. In Proc. of WWW, pages 705--714, 2011.
[18]
D. Yin, L. Hong, X. Xiong, and B. D. Davison. Link formation analysis in microblogs. In SIGIR, pages 1235--1236, 2011.
[19]
D. Zhao and M. B. Rosson. How and why people twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proc. of GROUP, pages 243--252, 2009.
[20]
G. Zhao, M. L. Lee, W. Hsu, W. Chen, and H. Hu. Community-based user recommendation in uni-directional social networks. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 189--198, 2013.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Why you follow: a classification scheme for twitter follow links

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HT '14: Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media
    September 2014
    346 pages
    ISBN:9781450329545
    DOI:10.1145/2631775
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 September 2014

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. link classification
    2. micro-blogging
    3. social network

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    HT '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    HT '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 49 of 86 submissions, 57%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 378 of 1,158 submissions, 33%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media