research-article

When toys come to life: considering the internet of toys from an animistic design perspective

Authors:

Maarten Van Mechelen,

Lizzy BleumersAuthors Info & Claims

IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children

Pages 170 - 180

https://doi.org/10.1145/3202185.3202745

Published: 19 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Children's play objects are increasingly shaped by technological innovations that can transform them into hybrid, internet-connected toys, a phenomenon referred to as the Internet of Toys. Previous research has presented user research on connected toys, but little is known how to approach them from a design perspective. This paper investigates whether and how an animistic design perspective can foster a fruitful exploration of the design potentialities of connected toys. It addresses this question by analysing three design concepts of connected toys that were developed in the course of an R&D project. These included a high-tech bracelet with digital passport, a card game with a customizable 3D-printed figurine, and a robot as a board game play mate. The results show how the design qualities of connected toys can be categorized on a spectrum ranging from a certainty-driven, problem-solving logic to an uncertainty-driven, animistic design perspective. The contribution of this study is a better understanding of how connected toys emerge in a broader ecology of children, toys, and data that all act upon each other. By embracing the uncertainty in this complex and fluid network of subjects and objects, the animistic design perspective allows to explore a broad set of design opportunities relevant in the realm of the Internet of Toys.

References

[1]

Edith K. Ackermann. 2005. Playthings That Do Things: A Young Kid's "Incredibles"! In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '05), 1--8.

Digital Library

[2]

Philip van Allen. 2017. Animistic Design for Smart Things. Retrieved January 4, 2018 from https://soc.kuleuven.be/mintlab/blog/news/basement-talks-30th-november-from-1pm-to-2pm/

[3]

Philip van Allen, Joshua McVeigh-Schultz, Brooklyn Brown, Hye Mi Kim, and Daniel Lara. 2013. AniThings: Animism and Heterogeneous Multiplicity. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), 2247--2256.

Digital Library

[4]

Wolmet Barendregt, Olof Torgersson, Eva Eriksson, and Peter Börjesson. 2017. Intermediate-Level Knowledge in Child-Computer Interaction: A Call for Action. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17), 7--16.

Digital Library

[5]

Tanya N. Beran, Alejandro Ramirez-Serrano, Roman Kuzyk, Meghann Fior, and Sarah Nugent. 2011. Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 7: 539--550.

Digital Library

[6]

Lizzy Bleumers, Karen Mouws, Jonathan Huyghe, Maarten Van Mechelen, Ilse Mariën, and Bieke Zaman. 2015. Sensitivity to Parental Play Beliefs and Mediation in Young Children's Hybrid Play Activities. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 170--177.

Digital Library

[7]

Tone Bratteteig, Keld Bødker, Yvonne Dittrich, Preben H. Mogensen, and Jesper Simonsen. 2012. Methods. Organising Principles and General Guidelines for Participatory Design Projects. In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (eds.). Routledge, Oxford, 117. Retrieved January 15, 2018 from https://www.bookdepository.com/Routledge-International-Handbook-Participatory-Design-Jesper-Simonsen/9780415720212

[8]

Stephane Chaudron, Rosanna Di Gioia, Monica Gemo, Donell Holloway, Jackie Marsh, Giovanna Mascheroni, Jochen Peter, and Dylan Yamada-Rice. 2016. Kaleidoscope on the Internet of Toys: Safety, security, privacy and societal insights. Joint Research Centre. Retrieved January 18, 2018 from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC105061

[9]

Gemma Galdon Clavell. 2015. Breaking down barriers for a better Internet. Retrieved April 11, 2018 from https://www.eiseverywhere.com/ehome/sif2015/agenda/

[10]

Paul Dourish. 2001. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US.

Digital Library

[11]

Jodi Forlizzi. 2008. The Product Ecology: Understanding Social Product Use and Supporting Design Culture. International Journal of Design 2, 1: 11--20.

[12]

Batya Friedman, Peter Kahn H., Jr., and Alan Borning. 2006. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Human-computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations, Yahong Zhang and Dennis F. Galletta (eds.). M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York; London, England, 348--372.

[13]

William W. Gaver, Andrew Boucher, Sarah Pennington, and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. interactions 11, 5: 53--56.

Digital Library

[14]

Donell Holloway and Lelia Green. 2016. The Internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice 2, 4: 506--519.

[15]

Donell Holloway, Leslie Haddon, Lelia Green, and Kylie Stevenson. 2018. The parent-child-app learning assemblage: Scaffolding early childhood learning through app use in the family home. In The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood, G. Falloon (ed.). Routledge, Abingdone, UK. Retrieved April 12, 2018 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322674672_The_parent-child-app_learning_assemblage_Scaffolding_early_childhood _learning_through_app_use_in_the_family_home

[16]

Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3: 1--18.

Digital Library

[17]

Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, Braden Kowitz, and Dan Bittner. 2016. Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days. Simon & Schuster Audio, New York.

[18]

Veronika Konok, Beáta Korcsok, Ádám Miklósi, and Márta Gácsi. 2018. Should we love robots? - The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Computers in Human Behavior 80, Supplement C: 132--142.

Digital Library

[19]

Bruno Latour. 2005. Third Source of Uncertainty: Objects too Have Agency. In Re-Assembling the Social: an Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.

[20]

Brenda Laurel. 2008. Designed Animism. In Re(Searching) the Digital Bauhaus. Springer, London, 251--274. Retrieved January 5, 2018 from http://www.tauzero.com/Brenda_Laurel/DesignedAnimism/DesignedAnimism.html

[21]

Deborah Lupton and Ben Williamson. 2017. The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights. New Media & Society: 1461444816686328.

[22]

Andrew Manches, Pauline Duncan, Lydia Plowman, and Shari Sabeti. 2015. Three questions about the Internet of Things and children. TechTrends 59, 1: 76--83.

[23]

Betti Marenko. 2014. Neo-Animism and Design: A New Paradigm in Object Theory. Design and Culture 6, 2: 219--241.

[24]

Betti Marenko and Philip van Allen. 2016. Animistic design: how to reimagine digital interaction between the human and the nonhuman: Digital Creativity: Vol 27, No 1. Digital Creativity 27, 1: 52--70.

[25]

Jackie Marsh. 2017. The internet of toys: a posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record 119. Retrieved April 12, 2018 from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=22073

[26]

Emily McReynolds, Sarah Hubbard, Timothy Lau, Aditya Saraf, Maya Cakmak, and Franziska Roesner. 2017. Toys That Listen: A Study of Parents, Children, and Internet-Connected Toys. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 5197--5207.

Digital Library

[27]

Gail F. Melson, Peter H. Kahn Jr., Alan M. Beck, Batya Friedman, Trace Roberts, and Erik Garrett. 2005. Robots As Dogs?: Children's Interactions with the Robotic Dog AIBO and a Live Australian Shepherd. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '05), 1649--1652.

Digital Library

[28]

Ádám Miklósi and Márta Gácsi. 2012. On the Utilization of Social Animals as a Model for Social Robotics. Frontiers in Psychology 3.

[29]

Byron Reeves and Clifford Ivar Nass. 1998. The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publ, Stanford, CA.

Digital Library

[30]

Marco Rozendaal. 2016. Objects with intent: A new paradigm for interaction design | ACM Interactions. Interactions 23, 62--65.

Digital Library

[31]

Rachel L. Severson and Stephanie M. Carlson. 2010. Behaving as or behaving as if? Children's conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks: The Official Journal of the International Neural Network Society 23, 8--9: 1099--1103.

Digital Library

[32]

Rachel C. Smith, Ole S. Iversen, Thomas Hjermitslev, and Aviaja B. Lynggaard. 2013. Towards an Ecological Inquiry in Child-computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13), 183--192.

Digital Library

[33]

Heikki Tyni, Annakaisa Kultima, Kati Alha, and Ville Kankainen. 2006. Hybrid Playful Experiences. Playing between Material and Digital. University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland. Retrieved April 13, 2018 from http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/98900/hybrid_playful_experiences_2016.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

[34]

Maarten Van Mechelen, Bieke Zaman, Lizzy Bleumers, and Ilse Mariën. 2018. Designing Internet of Toys for and with Children: A Participatory Design Case Study. In The Internet of Toys: Practices, Affordances and the Political Economy of Children's Play, Giovanna Mascheroni and Donell Holloway (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming.

[35]

W. N. Wang, V. Kuo, C. T. King, and C. P. Chang. 2010. Internet of Toys: An e-Pet overview and proposed innovative Social Toy Service Platform. In 2010 International Computer Symposium (ICS2010), 264--269.

[36]

Clancy Wilmott, Emma Fraser, and Sybille Lammes. 2017. 'I am he. I am he. Siri rules': Work and play with the Apple Watch. European Journal of Cultural Studies: 1--18.

[37]

2017. The Internet of Toys: A report on media and social discourses around young children and IoToys. Cost Action. Retrieved from http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/IoToys-June-2017-reduced.pdf

Cited By

Lupetti MVan Mechelen MSakamoto DWeiss AHiatt LShiomi M(2022)Promoting Children's Critical Thinking Towards Robotics through Robot DeceptionProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3523760.3523837(588-597)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3523760.3523837
Van Mechelen MSmith RSchaper MTamashiro MBilstrup KLunding MGraves Petersen MSejer Iversen O(2022)Emerging Technologies in K–12 Education: A Future HCI Research AgendaACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/356989730:3(1-40)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569897
Lupetti MVan Mechelen M(2022)Promoting Children's Critical Thinking Towards Robotics through Robot Deception2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889511(588-597)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889511
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

When toys come to life: considering the internet of toys from an animistic design perspective
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Interaction paradigms
      1. Mixed / augmented reality
  2. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms

Recommendations

Toys that Listen: A Study of Parents, Children, and Internet-Connected Toys
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Hello Barbie, CogniToys Dino, and Amazon Echo are part of a new wave of connected toys and gadgets for the home that listen. Unlike the smartphone, these devices are always on, blending into the background until needed. We conducted interviews with ...
Ready, Steady, Move! Coding Toys, Preschoolers, and Mobile Playful Learning
Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Ubiquitous and Virtual Environments for Learning and Collaboration
Abstract
This paper introduces a study focusing on preschool children’s employment of coding toys as a part of their daily play activities. Twenty preschoolers, aged 5–6 years, and their preschool teachers participated in a three-month study of playful ...
Privacy in smart toys: Risks and proposed solutions
Highlights
- The technology used in smart toys increases the risks to children’s privacy.
- We ...
Abstract
Smart toys have become popular as technological solutions offer a better experience for children. However, the technology employed greatly increases the risks to children’s privacy, which does not seem to have become a real concern for ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children

June 2018

789 pages

ISBN:9781450351522

DOI:10.1145/3202185

Conference Chairs:
Michail N. Giannakos
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
,
Letizia Jaccheri
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
,
Monica Divitini
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

iMinds

Conference

IDC '18

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

IDC '18: Interaction Design and Children

June 19 - 22, 2018

Trondheim, Norway

Acceptance Rates

IDC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 96 submissions, 29%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

8
Total Citations
View Citations
558
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)46
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Lupetti MVan Mechelen MSakamoto DWeiss AHiatt LShiomi M(2022)Promoting Children's Critical Thinking Towards Robotics through Robot DeceptionProceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction10.5555/3523760.3523837(588-597)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3523760.3523837
Van Mechelen MSmith RSchaper MTamashiro MBilstrup KLunding MGraves Petersen MSejer Iversen O(2022)Emerging Technologies in K–12 Education: A Future HCI Research AgendaACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/356989730:3(1-40)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569897
Lupetti MVan Mechelen M(2022)Promoting Children's Critical Thinking Towards Robotics through Robot Deception2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889511(588-597)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI53351.2022.9889511
Oravec JOravec J(2022)Negative Dimensions of Human-Robot and Human-AI Interactions: Frightening Legacies, Emerging Dysfunctions, and CreepinessGood Robot, Bad Robot10.1007/978-3-031-14013-6_3(39-89)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14013-6_3
Ling LYelland NHatzigianni MDickson-Deane C(2021)Toward a conceptualization of the internet of toysAustralasian Journal of Early Childhood10.1177/1836939121100732746:3(249-262)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.1177/18369391211007327
Garg R(2021)Understanding Families' Non-/Use Practices and Choices: The Case of Smart Speakers and Smart Interactive ToysProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34760365:CSCW2(1-26)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3476036
Kawas SYuan YDeWitt AJin QKirchner SBilger AGrantham EKientz JTartaro AYarosh SRubegni EVasalou AParés NSawhney N(2020)Another decade of IDC researchProceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3392063.3394436(205-215)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3392063.3394436
Van Mechelen MBaykal GDindler CEriksson EIversen ORubegni EVasalou AParés NSawhney N(2020)18 Years of ethics in child-computer interaction researchProceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3392063.3394407(161-183)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3392063.3394407
Van Mechelen MZaman BBleumers LMariën I(2019)Designing the Internet of Toys for and with Children: A Participatory Design Case StudyThe Internet of Toys10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_9(181-203)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10898-4_9

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents