research-article

Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Understand Why Students Choose to Study Computer Science

Authors:

Amnah Alshahrani,

Murray I. WoodAuthors Info & Claims

ICER '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

Pages 205 - 214

https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3230994

Published: 08 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The aim of this research is to use Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to identify and understand reasons why students choose to study Computer Science (CS) at university. SCCT focuses on students' prior experience, social support, self-efficacy and outcome expectation. The research is partly motivated by the desire to increase female participation rates in CS, particularly in the UK. Policymakers can use the factors that both females and males identify as influencing their choice of studying CS to enhance the experiences of all students prior to coming to university, but female students in particular. The study uses a semi-structured interview with 17 mixed gender subjects currently studying CS at three Scottish universities. The findings are that social support from family, teachers, friends and mentors is a particularly important factor in choosing to study CS, especially for female subjects. The career paths offered by a CS degree is another major factor, not just the potential jobs, but also the general value of a CS education and the potential to make useful contributions to society. School education appeared to have limited influence, though exposure to problem solving, programming, online self-learning and internships are positive influences. The stereotypical view of CS students as 'geeks' is outdated and unhelpful - it is more appropriate to see them as 'analytical' or 'over-achievers'. Subjects make many suggestions for improving the CS education provided at school, especially to make it more attractive to females, including: make it compulsory, teach it earlier, include more programming and problem solving, and increase the visibility of female exemplars and role models.

References

[1]

NVivo, version 10. 2014, QSR International.

[2]

Research Briefing looking at gender balance in STEM subjects at School. September 2015, Scotland Education: http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/Images/GenderBalanceBriefing_tcm4--869326.pdf.

[3]

Alvarado, C. and E. Judson, Using targeted conferences to recruit women into computer science. Communications of the ACM, 2014. 57(3): p. 70--77.

Digital Library

[4]

Amelink, C.T. and E.G. Creamer, Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career. Journal of Engineering Education, 2010. 99(1): p. 81--92.

[5]

Bandura, A., Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. 1986: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

[6]

Becker, H.S., Field work evidence. Sociological work: Method and substance, 1970.

[7]

Beyer, S., Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 2014. 24(2--3): p. 153--192.

[8]

Beyer, S. and S. Haller, Gender Differences and Intragender Differences in Computer Science Students: are Female CS Majors More Similar to Male CS Majors or Female Nonmajors? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2006. 12(4).

[9]

Bock, S., et al., Women and minorities in computer science majors: results on barriers from interviews and a survey. Issues in Information Systems, 2013. 14(1): p. 143--152.

[10]

Brown, N.C.C., et al. Bringing computer science back into schools: lessons from the UK. in Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[11]

Buzzetto-More, N.A., O. Ukoha, and N. Rustagi, Unlocking the barriers to women and minorities in computer science and information systems studies: Results from a multi-methodolical study conducted at two minority serving institutions. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 2010. 9: p. 115--131.

[12]

Chachashvili-Bolotin, S., M. Milner-Bolotin, and S. Lissitsa, Examination of factors predicting secondary students' interest in tertiary STEM education. International Journal of Science Education, 2016. 38(3): p. 366--390.

[13]

Chao, S.-H., Exploring the gender inequity in tertiary computer science courses: influential factors in females' choices in Australia and Taiwan. 2013, Monash University. Faculty of Education.

[14]

Cheryan, S., et al., Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 2017. 143(1): p. 1.

[15]

Cohoon, J. and W. Aspray, A critical review of the research on women's participation in postsecondary computing education. 2006: Mit Press.

[16]

De Lara, E. and L.Y. Liu, Identification, and the Crucial Role of Key Factors that Affect Women's Interest in Computer Science-A Qualitative Study of Women From Sweden, Mexico and India, in Department of Computer Science and Engineering. 2016, University of Gothenburg

[17]

Denner, J., et al., Community College Men and Women: A Test of Three Widely Held Beliefs About Who Pursues Computer Science. Community College Review,SAGE 2014. 42(4): p. 342--362.

[18]

Denner, J., L. Werner, and L. O'Connor, Women in Community College: Factors Related to Intentions to Pursue Computer Science. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 2015. 8(2): p. 156--171.

[19]

DuBow, W., J. Weidler-Lewis, and A. Kaminsky. Multiple factors converge to influence women's persistence in computing: A qualitative analysis of persisters and nonpersisters. in Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), 2016. 2016. IEEE.

[20]

Eccles, J., et al., & Midgley, C.(1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. Achievement and achievement motivation: p. 75--146.

[21]

El-Bahey, R. and A. Zeid. Women in computing A case study about Kuwait. in 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). 2013. IEEE.

[22]

Elo, S. and H. Kyngäs, The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 2008. 62(1): p. 107--115.

[23]

Fan, T.-S. and Y.-C. Li, Gender issues and computers: college computer science education in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 2005. 44(3): p. 285--300.

Digital Library

[24]

Gharibyan, H. and S. Gunsaulus, Gender gap in computer science does not exist in one former soviet republic: results of a study. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2006. 38(3): p. 222--226.

Digital Library

[25]

Google, Women Who Choose Computer Science _ What Really Matters The Critical Role of Encouragement and Exposure. 2014.

[26]

Google. Images of Computer Science: Perceptions Among Students, Parents and Educators in the U.S. 2015; Available from: https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/images-of-computer-science-report.pdf.

[27]

Graham, H., et al., Women in ICT and Digital Technologies: An investigation of the barriers to women entering, staying, and progressing in the sector, and actions to ameliorate this - Executive Summary. 2016: Edinburgh: Skills Development Scotland.

[28]

He, J. and L.A. Freeman, Are men more technology-oriented than women? The role of gender on the development of general computer self-efficacy of college students. Journal of Information Systems Education, 2010. 21(2): p. 203.

[29]

He, J. and L.A. Freeman, Understanding the formation of general computer self-efficacy. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2010. 26(1): p. 12.

[30]

Heinze, N. and Q. Hu, Why college undergraduates choose IT: a multi-theoretical perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 2009. 18(5): p. 462--475.

[31]

Hewner, M. and S. Mishra. When Everyone Knows CS is the Best Major: Decisions about CS in an Indian context. in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 2016. ACM.

Digital Library

[32]

Julien, H., Content analysis. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods, 2008. 2: p. 120--122.

[33]

Kahle, J. and G. Schmidt, Reasons women pursue a computer science career: perspectives of women from a mid-sized institution. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 2004. 19(4): p. 78--89.

Digital Library

[34]

Lang, C., Factors that shape student decision-making related to Information Technology study and career choices: a gendered analysis, in Centre for the Study of Higher Education. 2007, University of Melbourne.

[35]

Laosethakul, K. and T. Leingpibul, Why females do not choose computing? A lesson learned from China. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal, 2010. 4(3): p. 173--187.

[36]

Lehman, K.J., L.J. Sax, and H.B. Zimmerman, Women planning to major in computer science: Who are they and what makes them unique? Computer Science Education, 2017. 26(4): p. 277--298.

[37]

Lent, R.W., S.D. Brown, and G. Hackett, Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of vocational behavior, 1994. 45(1): p. 79--122.

[38]

Lent, R.W., et al., Social cognitive career theory, in Career choice and development. 2002. p. 255--311.

[39]

Lewis, C.M., R.E. Anderson, and K. Yasuhara. I Don't Code All Day: Fitting in Computer Science When the Stereotypes Don't Fit. in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 2016. ACM.

Digital Library

[40]

Margolis, J. and A. Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. 2003: MIT press.

[41]

Maxwell, J.A., Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative inquiry, 2010. 16(6): p. 475--482.

[42]

Mirjana, I., et al., A Note on Performance and Satisfaction of Female Students Studying Computer Science. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 2010. 9(1): p. 32--41.

[43]

Mishkin, H., et al., Career Choice of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016. 228: p. 222--228.

[44]

Nugent, G., et al., A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 2015. 37(7): p. 1067--1088.

[45]

Pappas, I.O., et al. Gender Differences in Computer Science Education: Lessons Learnt from an Empirical Study at NTNU. in NIK. 2016.

[46]

Patterson Hazley, M., Successful female students in undergraduate Computer Science and Computer Engineering: Motivation, self-regulation, and qualitative characteristics. 2016, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, College of Education and Human Sciences.

[47]

Powell, R.M. Improving the persistence of first-year undergraduate women in computer science. in ACM SIGCSE Bulletin. 2008. ACM.

Digital Library

[48]

Robson, C., Real world research. 2nd. Edition. Blackwell Publishing. Malden, 2002.

[49]

Rommes, E., et al., 'I'm not Interested in Computers': Gender-based occupational choices of adolescents. Information, Community and Society, 2007. 10(3): p. 299--319.

[50]

Sáinz, M. and M. López-Sáez, Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 2010. 54(2): p. 578--587.

Digital Library

[51]

Schulte, C. and M. Knobelsdorf. Attitudes towards computer science-computing experiences as a starting point and barrier to computer science. in Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research. 2007. ACM.

Digital Library

[52]

Shah, P., Cultural influences and new programs affecting women in Technology. 2011.

[53]

Sheu, H.-B. and J.J. Bordon, SCCT research in the international context: Empirical evidence, future directions, and practical implications. Journal of Career Assessment, SAGE, 2017.

[54]

Shoffner, M.F., et al., A qualitative exploration of the STEM career-related outcome expectations of young adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 2015. 42(2): p. 102--116.

[55]

Sinclair, J. and S. Kalvala, Exploring societal factors affecting the experience and engagement of first year female computer science undergraduates. 2015: p. 107--116.

Digital Library

[56]

Taylor, H.G. and L.C. Mounfield, Exploration of the relationship between prior computing experience and gender on success in college computer science. Journal of educational computing research, 1994. 11(4): p. 291--306.

[57]

Teague, J., Women in computing: What brings them to it, what keeps them in it? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2002. 34(2): p. 147--158.

Digital Library

[58]

Tillberg, H.K. and J.M. Cohoon, Attaching women to the CS major. Frontiers: a journal of women studies, 2005. 26(1): p. 126--140.

[59]

Varma, R., Exposure, Training, and Environment: Women's Participation in Computing Education in the United States and India. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 2009. 15(3).

[60]

Varma, R., Why so few women enroll in computing? Gender and ethnic differences in students' perception. Computer Science Education, 2010. 20(4): p. 301--316.

[61]

Wang, J., et al., Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Pursuit of Computer Science and Related Fields. 2015: p. 117--122.

Digital Library

[62]

Whitecraft, M.A. and W.M. Williams, Why aren't more women in computer science. Making software: What really works, and why we believe it, 2010: p. 221--238.

[63]

Wilson, B.C., A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences. Computer Science Education, 2010. 12(1--2): p. 141--164.

[64]

Wong, B., 'I'm good, but not that good': digitally-skilled young people's identity in computing. Computer Science Education, 2016. 26(4): p. 299--317.

[65]

Yasuhara, K. Choosing computer science: Women at the start of the undergraduate pipeline. in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2005.

[66]

Zeldin, A.L., S.L. Britner, and F. Pajares, A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2008. 45(9): p. 1036--1058.

Cited By

Bustamante-Mora ADiéguez-Rebolledo MHormazábal YValdés YVidal E(2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125038
Irunokhai EAdigun JOnihunwa JAdeniji OWealth SDada OSada Y(2024)INVESTIGATION OF GENDER-BASED INTEREST IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ENGAGEMENTS AMONG STUDENTS OF FEDERAL COLLEGE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, NEW BUSSAFUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-26268:4(276-282)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-2626
Cardador MJensen KLopez-Alvarez GCross K(2024)AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING INTRA-MAJOR SPECIALIZATION CHOICE AMONG SECOND-YEAR WOMEN ENGINEERING STUDENTSJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.202204278830:2(1-34)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022042788
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Understand Why Students Choose to Study Computer Science
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education

Recommendations

Computer science issues in high school: gender and more....
ITiCSE '09

Computer Science (CS) seems to be one of the few remaining disciplines almost entirely dominated by men, especially among university faculty and in the hi-tech industry. This phenomenon is prevalent throughout the western world. In Israel, we observed ...
Diversity Barriers in K-12 Computer Science Education: Structural and Social
SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

As computer science (CS) education expands at the K-12 level, we must be careful to ensure that CS neither exacerbates existing equity gaps in education nor hinders efforts to diversify the field of CS. In this paper, we discuss structural and social ...
Perspectives on How Computer Science Curricula 2013 Influences Two-Year College Programs (Abstract Only)
SIGCSE '15: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

The ACM Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013) guidance for undergraduate degrees was released in December 2013. This BOF will provide a platform for two-year and four-year computer science faculty and academic administrators to discuss CS2013 and its ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICER '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

August 2018

307 pages

ISBN:9781450356282

DOI:10.1145/3230977

General Chairs:
Lauri Malmi
Aalto University, Finland
,
Ari Korhonen
Aalto University, Finland
,
Robert McCartney
University of Connecticut, USA
,
Andrew Petersen
University of Toronto Mississauga, Canada
,
Program Chairs:
Lauri Malmi
Aalto University, Finland
,
Robert McCartney
University of Connecticut, USA

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 August 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICER '18

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ICER '18: International Computing Education Research Conference

August 13 - 15, 2018

Espoo, Finland

Acceptance Rates

ICER '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 125 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

ICER 2025

Sponsor:
sigcse

ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

August 3 - 6, 2025

Charlottesville , VA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

43
Total Citations
View Citations
1,155
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)180
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Bustamante-Mora ADiéguez-Rebolledo MHormazábal YValdés YVidal E(2024)Policies, Projects, and Initiatives for Sustainable Higher Education with Gender Equity: Literature Review and Case Study—Universidad de La FronteraSustainability10.3390/su1612503816:12(5038)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125038
Irunokhai EAdigun JOnihunwa JAdeniji OWealth SDada OSada Y(2024)INVESTIGATION OF GENDER-BASED INTEREST IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ENGAGEMENTS AMONG STUDENTS OF FEDERAL COLLEGE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, NEW BUSSAFUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-26268:4(276-282)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-2626
Cardador MJensen KLopez-Alvarez GCross K(2024)AN ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING INTRA-MAJOR SPECIALIZATION CHOICE AMONG SECOND-YEAR WOMEN ENGINEERING STUDENTSJournal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.202204278830:2(1-34)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2022042788
Smith K(2024)Admissions, Organization, Culture, and Policy: Understanding the Postsecondary Structures that Shape Women’s Entry into Computing Bachelor’s ProgramsAERA Open10.1177/2332858424129075810Online publication date: 12-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241290758
Vrieler T(2024)Applying the Computer Science Capital Framework to Understand Factors Facilitating Children's Decision to Participate in Code ClubsProceedings of the 24th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3699538.3699544(1-13)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3699538.3699544
Wente PMühling A(2024)Role Perceptions and Motivational Orientation of Computer Science TeachersProceedings of the 19th WiPSCE Conference on Primary and Secondary Computing Education Research10.1145/3677619.3678118(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677619.3678118
Shehzad UClarke-Midura JRecker M(2024)Examining the Role of Parental Support on Youth’s Interest in and Self-Efficacy of Computer ProgrammingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/367688824:3(1-23)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3676888
Kiehlbauch AVrbik IMohamed A(2024)Exploring Gender Disparities in Self-Efficacy in Computer Science Education: A Case Study at the University of British Columbia OkanaganProceedings of the 26th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education10.1145/3660650.3660655(1-6)Online publication date: 2-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3660650.3660655
Zuckerman AVo LJuavinett AStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)Student Motivations and Expectations for an Introductory Programming Course in BiologyProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630931(1498-1504)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630931
Kovaleva YKasurinen JKindsiko EHapponen A(2024)State-of-the-Art Review on Current Approaches to Female Inclusiveness in Software Engineering and Computer Science in Higher EducationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334676712(1360-1373)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3346767
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents