skip to main content
10.1145/1864708.1864724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding choice overload in recommender systems

Published: 26 September 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Even though people are attracted by large, high quality recommendation sets, psychological research on choice overload shows that choosing an item from recommendation sets containing many attractive items can be a very difficult task. A web-based user experiment using a matrix factorization algorithm applied to the MovieLens dataset was used to investigate the effect of recommendation set size (5 or 20 items) and set quality (low or high) on perceived variety, recommendation set attractiveness, choice difficulty and satisfaction with the chosen item. The results show that larger sets containing only good items do not necessarily result in higher choice satisfaction compared to smaller sets, as the increased recommendation set attractiveness is counteracted by the increased difficulty of choosing from these sets. These findings were supported by behavioral measurements revealing intensified information search and increased acquisition times for these large attractive sets. Important implications of these findings for the design of recommender system user interfaces will be discussed.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (recsys2010-28092010-04-04.jpg)
MOV File (recsys2010-28092010-04-04.mov)

References

[1]
}}R. Dhar. The effect of decision strategy on deciding to defer choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9(4):265--281, 1998.
[2]
}}K. Diehl and C. Poynor. Great Expectations?! Assortment Size, Expectations and Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3):312--322, 2010.
[3]
}}B. Fasolo, R. Hertwig, M. Huber, and M. Ludwig. Size, entropy, and density: What is the difference that makes the difference between small and large real-world assortments. Psychology & Marketing, 26(3):254--79, 2009.
[4]
}}G. Häubl and V. Trifts. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science, 19(1):4--21, 2000.
[5]
}}G. Haynes. Testing the boundaries of the choice overload phenomenon: The effect of number of options and time pressure on decision difficulty and satisfaction. Psychology and Marketing, 26(3):204--212, 2009.
[6]
}}J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):5--53, 2004.
[7]
}}S. S. Iyengar and M. R. Lepper. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6):995--1006, 2000.
[8]
}}B. Knijnenburg, L. Meesters, P. Marrow, and D. Bouwhuis. User-Centric Evaluation Framework for Multimedia Recommender Systems. pages 366--369. Springer, 2010.
[9]
}}B. P. Knijnenburg and M. C. Willemsen. Understanding the effect of adaptive preference elicitation methods on user satisfaction of a recommender system. In RecSys '09: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 381--384, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
[10]
}}B. P. Knijnenburg, M. C. Willemsen, and S. Hirtbach. Receiving recommendations and providing feedback: The user-experience of a recommender system. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies, 2010 (in press).
[11]
}}S. M. McNee, I. Albert, D. Cosley, P. Gopalkrishnan, S. K. Lam, A. M. Rashid, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. On the recommending of citations for research papers. In CSCW '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 116--125, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
[12]
}}S. M. McNee, J. Riedl, and J. A. Konstan. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In CHI '06: CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1097--1101, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[13]
}}E. Reutskaja and R. Hogarth. Satisfaction in choice as a function of the number of alternatives: When "goods satiate". Psychology and Marketing, 26(3):197--203, 2009.
[14]
}}B. Scheibehenne, R. Greifeneder, and P. Todd. Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta-Analytic Review of Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research, to be published in oktober 2010.
[15]
}}B. Scheibehenne, R. Greifeneder, and P. Todd. What moderates the too-much-choice effect? Psychology and Marketing, 26(3):229--53, 2009.
[16]
}}B. Schwartz. The paradox of choice. Ecco New York, 2004.
[17]
}}B. Schwartz. The tyranny of choice. Scientific American Mind, pages 70--75, 2004.
[18]
}}A. Shah and G. Wolford. Buying behavior as a function of parametric variation of number of choices. Psychological Science, 18(5):369--370, 2007.
[19]
}}I. Simonson. The effect of purchase quantity and timing on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2):150--162, 1990.
[20]
}}E. Van Herpen and R. Pieters. The variety of an assortment: An extension to the attribute-based approach. Marketing Science, 21(3):331--341, 2002.
[21]
}}C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 22--32, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RecSys '10: Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems
September 2010
402 pages
ISBN:9781605589060
DOI:10.1145/1864708
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 September 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. choice overload
  2. decision making
  3. information overload
  4. recommender systems

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

RecSys '10
Sponsor:
RecSys '10: Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
September 26 - 30, 2010
Barcelona, Spain

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 254 of 1,295 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)332
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)36
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media