skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3293838acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Undergraduate Computer Science Student Perceptions of their Own Field

Published: 22 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

It is not just K-12 students that have misconceptions about computer science. Undergraduate students entering into a post-secondary computer science major also have significant misconceptions about what a computer scientist actually does on a day-to-day basis, even at the end of their four-year undergraduate computer science program. While the Draw-A-Scientist Test (DAST) investigates student perceptions of scientists in general (Chambers, 1983) and the Draw-An- Engineer Test (DAET) examines student perceptions of engineers (Knight and Cunningham, 2004), there have been few adaptations investigating student perceptions of computer scientists (Martin, 2004). Based on previous research, our study assessed undergraduate computer science student perceptions of computer scientists at both a mid-size research university and a small liberal arts college. Students (n=120) were asked to describe computer scientists in both a visual format and a written format using an adaptation of the DAST. The authors share comparative results for computer science students (pre-test, post-test) perceptions when 1) exposed to an intentional but not explicit curriculum with diverse representation of computer scientist images and a broad range of computer science research areas, and 2) exposed to a regular curriculum without intentional messages about the diversity of computer scientists and the diversity of research areas within the discipline. The poster describes additional scoring measures introduced beyond those in previous instruments which help to better categorize and interpret perceptions of computer science students about their own discipline.

References

[1]
Chambers, M.W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist-test," Science Education, 67, 2, 255--265.
[2]
?Hour of code: Join the movement." https://hourofcode.com/
[3]
Knight, M. and Cunningham, C. (2004). Draw-an-engineer-test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students ideas about engineers and engineering," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, IEEE.
[4]
Martin, C. D. (2004). Draw-a-computer-scientist," ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36, 4,11--12, ACM.
[5]
?MIT, Scratch - imagine, program, share." https://scratch.mit.edu/

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 2019
1364 pages
ISBN:9781450358903
DOI:10.1145/3287324
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 February 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. broadening participation
  2. perceptions of computer science
  3. undergraduate students

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

SIGCSE '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 169 of 526 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media