skip to main content
10.1145/3557915.3561033acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Towards a tighter bound on possible-rendezvous areas: preliminary results

Published: 22 November 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Given trajectories with gaps, we investigate methods to tighten spatial bounds on areas (e.g., nodes in a spatial network) where possible rendezvous activity could have occurred. The problem is important for reducing manual effort to post-process possible rendezvous areas using satellite imagery and has many societal applications to improve public safety, security, and health. The problem of rendezvous detection is challenging due to the difficulty of interpreting missing data within a trajectory gap and the very high cost of detecting gaps in such a large volume of location data. Most recent literature presents formal models, namely space-time prism, to track an object's rendezvous patterns within trajectory gaps on a spatial network. However, the bounds derived from the space-time prism are rather loose, resulting in unnecessarily extensive postprocessing manual effort. To address these limitations, we propose a Time Slicing-based Gap-Aware Rendezvous Detection (TGARD) algorithm to tighten the spatial bounds in spatial networks. We propose a Dual Convergence TGARD (DC-TGARD) algorithm to improve computational efficiency using a bi-directional pruning approach. Theoretical results show the proposed spatial bounds on the area of possible rendezvous are tighter than that from related work (space-time prism). Experimental results on synthetic and real-world spatial networks (e.g., road networks) show that the proposed DC-TGARD is more scalable than the TGARD algorithm.

References

[1]
BBC. 2017. North Korea: South seizes ship amid row over illegal oil transfer. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42510783.
[2]
Su Chen et al. 2008. ST2B-tree: a self-tunable spatio-temporal B+-tree index for moving objects. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD. 29--42.
[3]
Ugur Demiryurek et al. 2011. Online computation of fastest path in time-dependent spatial networks. In SSTD. Springer, 92--111.
[4]
Bolin Ding, Jeffrey Xu Yu, and Lu Qin. 2008. Finding time-dependent shortest paths over large graphs. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Extending database technology: Advances in database technology. 205--216.
[5]
Hui Ding, Goce Trajcevski, and Peter Scheuermann. 2008. Efficient similarity join of large sets of moving object trajectories. (2008), 79--87.
[6]
S Dodge, R Weibel, and A. Lautenschütz. 2008. Towards a taxonomy of movement patterns. Information visualization 7, 3--4 (2008), 240--252.
[7]
Joshua S Greenfeld. 2002. Matching GPS observations to locations on a digital map. In Transportation Research Board 81st Annual Meeting, Vol. 22.
[8]
Venkata Gunturi et al. 2011. A critical-time-point approach to all-start-time lagrangian shortest paths: A summary of results. In International Symposium on Spatial and Temporal Databases. Springer, 74--91.
[9]
Hyun-Mi Kim and Mei-Po Kwan. 2003. Space-time accessibility measures: A geocomputational algorithm with a focus on the feasible opportunity set and possible activity duration. Journal of geographical Systems 5, 1 (2003), 71--91.
[10]
George Kollios et al. 1999. On indexing mobile objects. In Proceedings of the eighteenth Symposium on Principles of Database Systems. 261--272.
[11]
John Krumm, Robert Gruen, and Daniel Delling. 2013. From destination prediction to route prediction. Journal of Location Based Services 7, 2 (2013), 98--120.
[12]
John Krumm and Eric Horvitz. 2006. Predestination: Inferring destinations from partial trajectories. In UbiComp. Springer, 243--260.
[13]
Bart Kuijpers, Rafael Grimson, and Walied Othman. 2011. An analytic solution to the alibi query in the space-time prisms model for moving object data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 25, 2 (2011), 293--322.
[14]
B. Kuijpers, H. J. Miller, and W. Othman. 2017. Kinetic prisms: incorporating acceleration limits into space-time prisms. IJGIS 31, 11 (2017), 2164--2194.
[15]
Bart Kuijpers and Walied Othman. 2009. Modeling uncertainty of moving objects on road networks via space-time prisms. IJGIS 23, 9 (2009), 1095--1117.
[16]
Yin Lou et al. 2009. Map-matching for low-sampling-rate GPS trajectories. In 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL. 352--361.
[17]
H. J. Miller. 1991. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. IJGIS 5, 3 (1991), 287--301.
[18]
Jignesh M Patel, Yun Chen, and V Prasad Chakka. 2004. STRIPES: an efficient index for predicted trajectories. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 635--646.
[19]
A Sharma et al. 2020. Analyzing trajectory gaps for possible rendezvous: A summary of results. In 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2021)-Part I. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
[20]
A. Sharma, J. Gupta, and S Shekhar. 2022. Abnormal Trajectory-Gap Detection: A Summary (Short Paper). In 15th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2022). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
[21]
A Sharma and S Shekhar. 2022. Analyzing Trajectory Gaps to Find Possible Rendezvous Region. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 13, 3 (2022), 1--23.
[22]
Goce Trajcevski. 2003. Probabilistic range queries in moving objects databases with uncertainty. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on Data engineering for wireless and mobile access. 39--45.
[23]
Goce Trajcevski et al. 2004. Managing uncertainty in moving objects databases. ACM TODS 29, 3 (2004), 463--507.
[24]
Goce Trajcevski et al. 2010. Uncertain range queries for necklaces. In 2010 Eleventh International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, 199--208.
[25]
Reaz Uddin, Michael N Rice, Chinya V Ravishankar, and Vassilis J Tsotras. 2017. Assembly queries: Planning and discovering assemblies of moving objects using partial information. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. 1--10.
[26]
Jing Yuan, Yu Zheng, Chengyang Zhang, Xing Xie, and Guang-Zhong Sun. 2010. An interactive-voting based map matching algorithm. In 2010 Eleventh international conference on mobile data management. IEEE, 43--52.
[27]
Kai Zheng, Goce Trajcevski, Xiaofang Zhou, and Peter Scheuermann. 2011. Probabilistic range queries for uncertain trajectories on road networks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. 283--294.
[28]
Kai Zheng, Yu Zheng, Xing Xie, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2012. Reducing uncertainty of low-sampling-rate trajectories. In 2012 IEEE 28th ICDE. IEEE, 1144--1155.
[29]
Y. Zheng. 2015. Trajectory data mining: an overview. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 6, 3 (2015), 1--41.
[30]
Yu Zheng et al. 2010. GeoLife: A collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 33, 2 (2010), 32--39.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGSPATIAL '22: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
November 2022
806 pages
ISBN:9781450395298
DOI:10.1145/3557915
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 November 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. spatial modeling and reasoning
  2. spatio-temporal data analysis
  3. trajectory data mining

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

SIGSPATIAL '22
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 257 of 1,238 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)75
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media