skip to main content
10.1145/3503162.3503163acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfireConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards Automatic Green Claim Detection

Published: 26 January 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Companies frequently make claims about positive impacts on the environment, but these claims are not always valid. In this sense, “greenwashing” is used when a company states a false claim about its products and practices being environmentally friendly. It is an important issue and has attracted the attention of policymakers to strengthen consumer law and new companies with the mission of helping brands and consumers to become more eco-friendly. However, manual screening of websites and social networks for sustainable claims (green claims) is time-consuming. Automatic detection of green claims is an underexplored problem from a computer science perspective, and thus, we present the design, training and evaluation of different approaches in this study. Our experiments reveal that although pre-trained models present high performance, they also show sensibility to adversarial attacks, such as character-swap-based methods, which are common in social networks. In order to understand the applicability in a real-world scenario, we also evaluated its generalization performance, which showed a notable performance across different domains.

References

[1]
Ben Adler and Giacomo Boscaini-Gilroy. 2019. Real-time claim detection from news articles and retrieval of semantically-similar factchecks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02030(2019).
[2]
Alan Akbik, Tanja Bergmann, Duncan Blythe, Kashif Rasul, Stefan Schweter, and Roland Vollgraf. 2019. FLAIR: An easy-to-use framework for state-of-the-art NLP. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Demonstrations). 54–59.
[3]
Alan Akbik, Duncan Blythe, and Roland Vollgraf. 2018. Contextual string embeddings for sequence labeling. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on computational linguistics. 1638–1649.
[4]
Subhabrata Banerjee, Charles S Gulas, and Easwar Iyer. 1995. Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of advertising 24, 2 (1995), 21–31.
[5]
Josue Caraballo. 2018. A Taxonomy of Political Claims. (2018).
[6]
Les Carlson, Stephen J Grove, and Norman Kangun. 1993. A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: A matrix method approach. Journal of advertising 22, 3 (1993), 27–39.
[7]
Rosa Maria Dangelico and Daniele Vocalelli. 2017. “Green Marketing”: An analysis of definitions, strategy steps, and tools through a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Cleaner Production 165 (2017), 1263–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.184
[8]
Sebastião Vieira de Freitas Netto, Marcos Felipe Falcão Sobral, Ana Regina Bezerra Ribeiro, and Gleibson Robert da Luz Soares. 2020. Concepts and forms of greenwashing: a systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe 32, 1 (2020), 1–12.
[9]
Ji Gao, Jack Lanchantin, Mary Lou Soffa, and Yanjun Qi. 2018. Black-box generation of adversarial text sequences to evade deep learning classifiers. In 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW). IEEE, 50–56.
[10]
Siddhant Garg and Goutham Ramakrishnan. 2020. BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classification. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 6174–6181.
[11]
Naeemul Hassan, Fatma Arslan, Chengkai Li, and Mark Tremayne. 2017. Toward automated fact-checking: Detecting check-worthy factual claims by claimbuster. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1803–1812.
[12]
Andrew F Hayes and Klaus Krippendorff. 2007. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication methods and measures 1, 1 (2007), 77–89.
[13]
Di Jin, Zhijing Jin, Joey Tianyi Zhou, and Peter Szolovits. 2019. Is bert really robust? natural language attack on text classification and entailment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11932 2 (2019).
[14]
Joseph Kobti. 2021. Green Claims Dataset. https://zenodo.org/record/5764913#.YbBjlbso9th
[15]
Lev Konstantinovskiy, Oliver Price, Mevan Babakar, and Arkaitz Zubiaga. 2018. Towards automated factchecking: Developing an annotation schema and benchmark for consistent automated claim detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.08193(2018).
[16]
Constantinos N Leonidou and Dionysis Skarmeas. 2017. Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. Journal of Business Ethics 144, 2 (2017), 401–415.
[17]
J Li, S Ji, T Du, B Li, and T Wang. 2019. TextBugger: Generating Adversarial Text Against Real-world Applications. In 26th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium.
[18]
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692(2019).
[19]
M Lukinović and L Jovanović. 2019. Greenwashing–fake green/environmental marketing. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools 33, 3 (2019), 15–17.
[20]
Melinda Majláth. 2017. The effect of greenwashing information on ad evaluation. European Journal of Sustainable Development 6, 3 (2017), 92–92.
[21]
Christopher Marquis, Michael W Toffel, and Yanhua Zhou. 2016. Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science 27, 2 (2016), 483–504.
[22]
Chris Marsden and Trisha Meyer. 2019. Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence: effects of disinformation initiatives on freedom of expression and media pluralism. European Parliament.
[23]
John Morris, Eli Lifland, Jin Yong Yoo, Jake Grigsby, Di Jin, and Yanjun Qi. 2020. TextAttack: A Framework for Adversarial Attacks, Data Augmentation, and Adversarial Training in NLP. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. 119–126.
[24]
Preslav Nakov, Giovanni Da San Martino, Tamer Elsayed, Alberto Barrón-Cedeno, Rubén Míguez, Shaden Shaar, Firoj Alam, Fatima Haouari, Maram Hasanain, Nikolay Babulkov, 2021. The CLEF-2021 CheckThat! lab on detecting check-worthy claims, previously fact-checked claims, and fake news. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 639–649.
[25]
Béatrice Parguel, Florence Benoit-Moreau, and Cristel Antonia Russell. 2015. Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing’. International Journal of Advertising 34, 1 (2015), 107–134.
[26]
Danish Pruthi, Bhuwan Dhingra, and Zachary C Lipton. 2019. Combating Adversarial Misspellings with Robust Word Recognition. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 5582–5591.
[27]
Shuhuai Ren, Yihe Deng, Kun He, and Wanxiang Che. 2019. Generating natural language adversarial examples through probability weighted word saliency. In Proceedings of the 57th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics. 1085–1097.
[28]
Szerena Szabo and Jane Webster. 2020. Perceived greenwashing: the effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of Business Ethics(2020), 1–21.
[29]
SMZA Tarabieh. 2021. The impact of greenwash practices over green purchase intention: The mediating effects of green confusion, Green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Science Letters 11, 2 (2021), 451–464.
[30]
Eigo Tateishi. 2018. Craving gains and claiming “green” by cutting greens? An exploratory analysis of greenfield housing developments in Iskandar Malaysia. Journal of Urban Affairs 40, 3 (2018), 370–393.
[31]
TerraChoice. 2010. The sins of greenwashing: home and family edition. Retrieved May 1, 2021 from http://faculty.wwu.edu/dunnc3/rprnts.TheSinsofGreenwashing2010.pdf
[32]
David Wadden, Shanchuan Lin, Kyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Madeleine van Zuylen, Arman Cohan, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2020. Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 7534–7550.
[33]
Lu Zhang, Dayuan Li, Cuicui Cao, and Senhua Huang. 2018. The influence of greenwashing perception on green purchasing intentions: The mediating role of green word-of-mouth and moderating role of green concern. Journal of Cleaner Production 187 (2018), 740–750.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Towards Automatic Green Claim Detection
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        FIRE '21: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation
        December 2021
        113 pages
        ISBN:9781450395960
        DOI:10.1145/3503162
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 26 January 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. Claim detection
        2. Corpus annotation
        3. Error analysis
        4. Greenwashing
        5. Natural language processing

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Conference

        FIRE 2021
        FIRE 2021: Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation
        December 13 - 17, 2021
        Virtual Event, India

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate 19 of 64 submissions, 30%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)139
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
        Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all

        View Options

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format.

        HTML Format

        Figures

        Tables

        Media

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media