Article

Six modes of proactive resource management: a user-centric typology for proactive behaviors

Authors:

Antti Salovaara,

Antti OulasvirtaAuthors Info & Claims

NordiCHI '04: Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction

Pages 57 - 60

https://doi.org/10.1145/1028014.1028022

Published: 23 October 2004 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

Proactivity has recently arisen as one of the focus areas within HCI. Proactive systems adhere to two premises: 1) working on behalf of, or <i>pro</i>, the user, and 2) acting on their own initiative. To extend researchers' views on how proactive systems can support the user, we clarify the concept of proactivity and suggest a typology that distinguishes between 6 modes of proactive resource management: preparation, optimization, advising, manipulation, inhibition, and finalization of user's resources. A scenario of mobile imaging is presented to illustrate how the typology can support the innovation of new use purposes. We argue that conceptual developments like the one proposed here are crucial for the advancement of the emerging field.

References

[1]

Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D. and Salber, D. A conceptual framework for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 2--4 (2001), 97--166.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Horvitz, E. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 159--166.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

ISTAG (2001). Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Information Society Technology Advisory Group, European Union, Sixth Framework Programme.

Google Scholar

[4]

Koskinen, I., Kurvinen, E., and Lehtonen, T.-K. Mobile Image. IT Press, Helsinki, Finland (2002).

Google Scholar

[5]

Lee, G., Faratin, P., Bauer, S. and Wroclawski, J. A user-guided cognitive agent for network service selection in pervasive computing environments. Proc. Per-Com 2004, IEEE Computer Society (2004), 219--228.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

Licklider, J. C. R. Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-1 (1960), 4--11.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Lieberman, H. Autonomous interface agents. Proc. CHI 1997, ACM Press (1997), 67--74.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Maes, P. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Communications of the ACM 37, 7 (1994), 31--40 and 146.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[9]

Oulasvirta, A. Finding new uses for context-aware technologies: The humanistic research strategy. Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 247--254.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

Rich, C. and Sidner, C. L. Adding a collaborative agent to graphical user interfaces. Proc. UIST 1996, ACM Press (1996), 21--30.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

Sarvas, R., Herrarte, E., Wilhelm, A., and Davis., M. Metadata creation system for mobile images. Proc. MobiSys 2004, Boston, MA, USA. ACM Press.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

Satyanarayanan, M. Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Personal Technologies 8, 4 (2001), 10--17.

Google Scholar

[13]

Tennenhouse, D. Proactive computing. Communications of the ACM 43, 5(2000), 43--50.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Chaves AGerosa M(2020)How Should My Chatbot Interact? A Survey on Social Characteristics in Human–Chatbot Interaction DesignInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2020.184143837:8(729-758)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
Jamnal GLiu XFan LRamachandran M(2019)Cognitive Internet of Everything (CIoE)Securing the Internet of Things10.4018/978-1-5225-9866-4.ch055(1212-1238)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2019
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9866-4.ch055
Serim BJacucci GBrewster SFitzpatrick GCox AKostakos V(2019)Explicating "Implicit Interaction"Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300647(1-16)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300647
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Effects of Proactive Dialogue Strategies on Human-Computer Trust
UMAP '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization

Intelligent computer systems aim at providing user-assistance for challenging tasks, like decision-making, planning, or learning. For offering optimal assistance, it is essential for such systems to decide when to be reactive or proactive and how active ...
Design and Evaluation of Service Robot's Proactivity in Decision-Making Support Process
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

As service robots are envisioned to provide decision-making support (DMS) in public places, it is becoming essential to design the robot's manner of offering assistance. For example, robot shop assistants that proactively or reactively give product ...
Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots
DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Text messaging-based conversational agents (CAs), popularly called chatbots, received significant attention in the last two years. However, chatbots are still in their nascent stage: They have a low penetration rate as 84% of the Internet users have not ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

NordiCHI '04: Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction

October 2004

472 pages

ISBN:1581138571

DOI:10.1145/1028014

General Chair:
Roope Raisamo

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

NordiCHI04

NordiCHI04: NordiCHI 2004

October 23 - 27, 2004

Tampere, Finland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

22
Total Citations
View Citations
583
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)14
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Chaves AGerosa M(2020)How Should My Chatbot Interact? A Survey on Social Characteristics in Human–Chatbot Interaction DesignInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2020.184143837:8(729-758)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1841438
Jamnal GLiu XFan LRamachandran M(2019)Cognitive Internet of Everything (CIoE)Securing the Internet of Things10.4018/978-1-5225-9866-4.ch055(1212-1238)Online publication date: 6-Sep-2019
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9866-4.ch055
Serim BJacucci GBrewster SFitzpatrick GCox AKostakos V(2019)Explicating "Implicit Interaction"Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300647(1-16)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3290605.3300647
Uzunov ANepal SBaruwal Chhetri M(2019)Proactive Antifragility: A New Paradigm for Next-Generation Cyber Defence at the Edge2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)10.1109/CIC48465.2019.00039(246-255)Online publication date: Dec-2019
https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC48465.2019.00039
Neyens GZampunieris D(2019)Proactive Middleware for Fault Detection and Advanced Conflict Handling in Sensor FusionArtificial Intelligence and Soft Computing10.1007/978-3-030-20915-5_57(643-653)Online publication date: 27-May-2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20915-5_57
Jamnal GLiu XFan LRamachandran M(2017)Cognitive Internet of Everything (CIoE)Emerging Trends and Applications of the Internet of Things10.4018/978-1-5225-2437-3.ch010(277-309)Online publication date: 2017
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2437-3.ch010
Salman YAbu-Issa ATumar IHassouneh Y(2017)A model and prototype of a proactive multi-type context-aware recommender system2017 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys)10.1109/IntelliSys.2017.8324308(297-303)Online publication date: Sep-2017
https://doi.org/10.1109/IntelliSys.2017.8324308
Shcherbakov MGroumpos PKravets A(2017)A Method and IR4I Index Indicating the Readiness of Business Processes for Data Science SolutionsCreativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science10.1007/978-3-319-65551-2_2(21-34)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2017
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65551-2_2
Dobrican RZampunieris D(2016)A Proactive Solution, using Wearable and Mobile Applications, for Closing the Gap between the Rehabilitation Team and Cardiac Patients2016 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)10.1109/ICHI.2016.23(146-155)Online publication date: Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2016.23
Duczman MBrangier EThévenin A(2016)Criteria Based Approach to Assess the User Experience of Driving Information Proactive System: Integration of Guidelines, Heuristic Mapping and Case StudyAdvances in Ergonomics in Design10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_8(79-90)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_8
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Recommendations

Effects of Proactive Dialogue Strategies on Human-Computer Trust

Design and Evaluation of Service Robot's Proactivity in Decision-Making Support Process

Evaluating and Informing the Design of Chatbots