skip to main content
10.1145/3560905.3567767acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simultaneous Sporadic Sensor Anomaly Detection for Smart Homes

Published: 24 January 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Dissemination of sensors and advances in techniques (e.g., network) has led to the opportunity for smart home. However, sensor malfunctions and difficult-to-diagnose characteristics hinder robust sensor system operation. Sensor anomaly detection systems for smart home have been proposed, but they target only a few specific types of sensor anomalies of a single sensor. In this work, we propose a sensor anomaly detection method based on Deep Neural Network (DNN), which automatically extracts critical features to detect the anomalies, even for simultaneous sporadic anomalies with complex data patterns. We leverage Hypersphere Classification (HSC) [14], the state-of-the-art DNN-based supervised outlier exposure method. We evaluate our proposed method on a public smart home sensor dataset. Our results show that the performances of the baselines drop up to 54.4% while ours drops up to 1.1%.

References

[1]
2022. Apriori Algorithm - Wikipedia. Retrieved September 20, 2022 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apriori_algorithm
[2]
2022. Association rule learning - Wikipedia. Retrieved September 2, 2022 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_rule_learning
[3]
Diane J Cook. 2010. Learning setting-generalized activity models for smart spaces. IEEE intelligent systems 2010, 99 (2010), 1.
[4]
Aaron S Crandall and Diane J Cook. 2010. Using a hidden markov model for resident identification. In 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Environments. IEEE, 74--79.
[5]
Kyoung Nam Ha, Kyung Chang Lee, and Suk Lee. 2006. Development of PIR sensor based indoor location detection system for smart home. In 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference. IEEE, 2162--2167.
[6]
Jiawei Han, Jian Pei, and Hanghang Tong. 2022. Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan kaufmann.
[7]
Timothy W Hnat, Vijay Srinivasan, Jiakang Lu, Tamim I Sookoor, Raymond Dawson, John Stankovic, and Kamin Whitehouse. 2011. The hitchhiker's guide to successful residential sensing deployments. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 232--245.
[8]
Palanivel A Kodeswaran, Ravi Kokku, Sayandeep Sen, and Mudhakar Srivatsa. 2016. Idea: A system for efficient failure management in smart iot environments. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services. 43--56.
[9]
Madhumita Mallick, Palanivel Kodeswaran, Sayandeep Sen, Ravi Kokku, and Niloy Ganguly. 2018. Tsfs: An integrated approach for event segmentation and adl detection in iot enabled smarthomes. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 18, 11 (2018), 2686--2700.
[10]
Madhumita Mallick, Archan Misra, Niloy Ganguly, and Youngki Lee. 2020. DETECTIF: Unified Detection & Correction of IoT Faults in Smart Homes. In 2020 IEEE 21st International Symposium on" A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks"(WoWMoM). IEEE, 78--87.
[11]
Sirajum Munir and John A Stankovic. 2014. Failuresense: Detecting sensor failure using electrical appliances in the home. In 2014 IEEE 11th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems. IEEE, 73--81.
[12]
Nirmalya Roy, Archan Misra, and Diane Cook. 2013. Infrastructure-assisted smartphone-based ADL recognition in multi-inhabitant smart environments. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 38--46.
[13]
Lukas Ruff, Robert Vandermeulen, Nico Goernitz, Lucas Deecke, Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Alexander Binder, Emmanuel Müller, and Marius Kloft. 2018. Deep one-class classification. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 4393--4402.
[14]
Lukas Ruff, Robert A Vandermeulen, Billy Joe Franks, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Marius Kloft. 2020. Rethinking assumptions in deep anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00339 (2020).
[15]
Sasan Saqaeeyan, Hossein Amirkhani, et al. 2020. Anomaly detection in smart homes using bayesian networks. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems (TIIS) 14, 4 (2020), 1796--1816.
[16]
Di Wu, Zhongkai Jiang, Xiaofeng Xie, Xuetao Wei, Weiren Yu, and Renfa Li. 2019. LSTM learning with Bayesian and Gaussian processing for anomaly detection in industrial IoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 16, 8 (2019), 5244--5253.
[17]
Juan Ye, Graeme Stevenson, and Simon Dobson. 2015. Fault detection for binary sensors in smart home environments. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). IEEE, 20--28.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Simultaneous Sporadic Sensor Anomaly Detection for Smart Homes

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SenSys '22: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
    November 2022
    1280 pages
    ISBN:9781450398862
    DOI:10.1145/3560905
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 January 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. anomaly detection
    2. deep learning
    3. smart home
    4. unsupervised outlier exposure

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    Acceptance Rates

    SenSys '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 52 of 187 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 174 of 867 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media