skip to main content
10.1145/1378191.1378200acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On combining temporal scaling and quality scaling for streaming MPEG

Published: 26 May 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Temporal Scaling and Quality Scaling are both widely-used techniques to reduce the bitrate of streaming video. However, combinations and comparisons of Temporal and Quality Scaling have not been systematically studied. This research extends previous work to provide a model for combining Temporal and Quality Scaling, and uses an optimization algorithm to provide a systematic analysis of their combination over a range of network conditions and video content. Analytic experiments show: 1) Quality Scaling typically performs better than Temporal Scaling, with performance differences correlated with the motion characteristics of the video. In fact, when the network capacity is moderate and the loss rate is low, Quality Scaling performs nearly as well as the optimal combination of Quality and Temporal Scaling; 2) when the network capacity is low and the packet loss rate is high, Quality Scaling alone is ineffective, but a combination of Quality and Temporal Scaling can provide reasonable video quality; 3) adjusting the amount of Forward Error Correction (FEC) provides significantly better performance than video streaming without FEC or video streaming with a fixed amount of FEC.

References

[1]
N. Feamster and H. Balakrishnan. Packet Loss Recovery for Streaming Video. In Proceedings of Packet Video Workshop (PV), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Apr. 2002.
[2]
S. Floyd and K. Fall. Promoting the Use of End-to-End Congestion Control in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, Feb. 1999.
[3]
P. Frossard and O. Verscheure. Joint Source/FEC Rate Selection for Quality-Optimal MPEG-2 Video Delivery. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10(12):1815--1825, Dec. 2001.
[4]
F. Hartanto and H. R. Sirisena. Hybrid Error Control Mechanism for Video Transmission in the Wireless IP Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE LANMAN, Nov. 1999.
[5]
S. Jaiswal, G. Iannaccone, C. Diot, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Inferring TCP Connection Characteristics Through Passive Measurements. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, Hong Kong, China, Apr. 2004.
[6]
C. Krasic, J. Walpole, and W.-C. Feng. Quality-adaptive Media Streaming by Priority Drop. In Proceedings of NOSSDAV, Monterey, CA, USA, June 2003.
[7]
K. Mayer-Patel, L. Le, and G. Carle. An MPEG Performance Model and Its Application To Adaptive Forward Error Correction. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, December 2002.
[8]
J. McCarthy, M. A. Sasse, and D. Miras. Sharp or Smooth? Comparing the Effects of Quantization versus Frame Rate for Streamed Video. In Proceedings of ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 2004.
[9]
J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose. Modeling TCP Throughput: A Simple Model and Its Empirical Validation. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Vancouver, Brisish Columbia, Candada, 1998.
[10]
M. Pinson and S. Wolf. A New Standardized Method for Objectively Measuring Video Quality. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 50(3):312--322, Sept. 2004.
[11]
I. S. Reed and G. Solomon. Polynomial Codes Over Certain Finite Fields. Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 8(2):300--304, June 1960.
[12]
X. Su and B. W. Wah. Multi-Description Video Streaming with Optimized Reconstruction-Based DCT and Neural-Network Compensations. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 3(1):123--131, Mar. 2001.
[13]
H. Wu, M. Claypool, and R. Kinicki. Adjusting Forward Error Correction with Quality Scaling for Streaming MPEG. In Proceedings of NOSSDAV, Stevenson, Washington, USA, June 2005.
[14]
H. Wu, M. Claypool, and R. Kinicki. Adjusting Forward Error Correction with Temporal Scaling for TCP-Friendly Streaming MPEG. ACM TOMCCAP, 1(4), Nov. 2005.
[15]
H. Wu, M. Claypool, and R. Kinicki. ARMOR - A System for Adjusting Repair and Media Scaling for Video Streaming. In Submission of ACM Multimedia, 2006.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
NOSSDAV '06: Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
May 2006
168 pages
ISBN:1595932852
DOI:10.1145/1378191
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 May 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

NOSSDAV06
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 118 of 363 submissions, 33%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 01 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media