skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557384acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Nutriflect: reflecting collective shopping behavior and nutrition

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

A poor nutritional state, as is the case for many people today, can increase risks for cancer, cardiovascular disease and obesity. Technology supported approaches could potentially be used to positively influence food consumption. We present the Nutriflect system, which utilizes users' shopping data to inform them about their long term shopping behavior. In an initial study we conducted structured interviews in grocery stores. Based on the results we implemented a system that visualized a household's collective shopping information via situated displays. The aim was to raise awareness about shopping habits and to enable reflection about nutrition without burdening the users with the manual entry of their eating habits. We evaluated the system in a 4 week field study in 8 households with 21 users. The results indicate that contextually situated displays, showing shopping patterns against personal nutrition goals, can foster a reflective and respectful approach towards better shopping and nutrition.

References

[1]
Die Ernährungspyramide im Detail - 7 Stufen zur Gesundheit. Bundesministerium für Gesundheit. http://bmg.gv.at/home/Schwerpunkte/Ernaehrung/Empfehlungen/
[2]
White Paper on a Strategy for Europe on Nutrition, Overweight and Obesity related health issues. European Commission, Brussels, 2007.
[3]
WHO Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. WHO, Geneva, 2004.
[4]
Andrew, A. H., Borriello, G. and Fogarty, J. Simplifying Mobile Phone Food Diaries. In PervasiveHealth 2013 (2013), 260--263.
[5]
Cirillo, R. The economics of Vilfredo Pareto. Cass, London ; Totowa, N.J., 1979.
[6]
Comber, R., Hoonhout, J., Halteren, A. v., Moynihan, P. and Olivier, P. Food practices as situated action: exploring and designing for everyday food practices with households. In Proc. CHI13, ACM (2013), 2457--2466.
[7]
Duhigg, C. How Companies Learn Your Secrets. City, 2012.
[8]
Ellwood, P., Innes Asher, M., García-Marcos, L., Williams, H., Keil, U., Robertson, C., and Nagel, G. Do fast foods cause asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema? Global findings from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Phase Three. Thorax(2013).
[9]
Elmadfa, I. Österreichischer Ernährungsbericht 2012. 9783901861970, Vienna, Austria, 2012.
[10]
Erickson, T., Podlaseck, M., Sahu, S., Dai, J. D., Chao, T. and Naphade, M. The dubuque water portal: evaluation of the uptake, use and impact of residential water consumption feedback. In Proc. CHI12, ACM (2012), 675--684.
[11]
Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2003.
[12]
Fogg, B. J. The Six Most Powerful Persuasion Strategies. Springer, City, 2006.
[13]
Ganglbauer, E., Fitzpatrick, G. and Molzer, G. Creating visibility: understanding the design space for food waste. In Proc. MUM12, ACM (2012), 1--10.
[14]
Grießhammer, R. and Hochfeld, C. Memorandum Product Carbon Footprint BMU, UBA, Öko-Institut e.V., Freiburg, 2009.
[15]
Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J. D. and Grinter, R. E. EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a lowincome community. In Proc CSCW08, ACM (2008), 87--96.
[16]
Grimes, A., Kantroo, V. and Grinter, R. E. Let's play!: mobile health games for adults. In Proc. Ubicomp10, ACM (2010), 241--250.
[17]
Gustafsson, A. and Gyllenswärd, M. The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. ACM, N.Y., 2005.
[18]
Kimokoti, R. and Millen, B. E. Diet, the Global Obesity Epidemic, and Prevention. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 111, 8 (2011), 1137--1140.
[19]
Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M. B., Paay, J. and Pathmanathan, R. Using mobile phones to support sustainability: a field study of residential electricity consumption. In Proc. CHI12, ACM (2012), 2347--2356.
[20]
Kong, F. and Tan, J. DietCam: Automatic dietary assessment with mobile camera phones. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 8, 1 (2012), 147--163.
[21]
Lee, M. K., Kiesler, S. and Forlizzi, J. Mining behavioral economics to design persuasive technology for healthy choices. In Proc. CHI11, ACM (2011), 325--334.
[22]
Maitland, J., Chalmers, M. and Siek, K. A. Persuasion not required Improving our understanding of the sociotechnical context of dietary behavioural change. In Proc. PervasiveHealth 2009. IEEE (2009), 1--8.
[23]
Mamykina, L., Miller, A. D., Grevet, C., Medynskiy, Y., Terry, M. A., Mynatt, E. D. and Davidson, P. R. Examining the impact of collaborative tagging on sensemaking in nutrition management. In Proc. CHI11, ACM (2011), 657--666.
[24]
Mankoff, J., Hsieh, G., Hung, H. C., Lee, S. and Nitao, E. Using Low-Cost Sensing to Support Nutritional Awareness. In Proc. Ubicomp02, Springer-Verlag (2002), 371--376.
[25]
Noronha, J., Hysen, E., Zhang, H. and Gajos, K. Z. Platemate: crowdsourcing nutritional analysis from food photographs. In Proc. UIST, ACM (2011), 1--12.
[26]
Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, 28 (2009).
[27]
Österreichisches Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Österreichische Ernährungspyramide, 2010.
[28]
Pässler, S., Wolff, M. and Fischer, W.-J. Food intake recognition conception for wearable devices. In Proc. ACM MobiHoc, ACM (2011), 1--4.
[29]
Purpura, S., Schwanda, V., Williams, K., Stubler, W. and Sengers, P. Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In Proc. CHI11, ACM (2011), 423--432.
[30]
Reitberger, W., Güldenpfennig, F. and Fitzpatrick, G. Persuasive Technology Considered Harmful? An Exploration of Design Concerns through the TV Companion. In Proc. Persuasive12. Springer, 2012.
[31]
Reitberger, W., Ploderer, B., Obermair, C. and Tscheligi, M. The perCues Framework and its Application for Sustainable Mobility. In PERSUASIVE 2007, Springer (2007), 92--95.
[32]
Siek, K. A., Connelly, K. H., Rogers, Y., Rohwer, P., Lambert, D. and Welch, J. L. When Do We Eat? An Evaluation of Food Items Input into an Electronic Food Monitoring Application. 2006.
[33]
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. Nudge : improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, 2008.
[34]
Tsai, C. C., Lee, G., Raab, F., Norman, G. J., Sohn, T., Griswold, W. G. and Patrick, K. Usability and feasibility of PmEB: a mobile phone application for monitoring real time caloric balance. Mob. Netw. Appl., 12, 2--3 (2007), 173--184.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Nutriflect: reflecting collective shopping behavior and nutrition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2014
    4206 pages
    ISBN:9781450324731
    DOI:10.1145/2556288
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. awareness
    2. behavior change
    3. field study
    4. nutrition
    5. reflection
    6. shopping
    7. situated displays

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '14
    Sponsor:
    CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2014
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 07 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media