skip to main content
10.1145/3664476.3669927acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaresConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multimodal Security Mechanisms for Critical Time Systems using blockchain in Chriss project

Published: 30 July 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Abstract - This paper presents an in-depth description of a multi-modal security solution based on a blockchain architecture developed within the CHRISS (Critical infrastructure High accuracy and Robustness increase Integrated Synchronization Solutions) project. Specifically, the focus in the paper is on the description of the proposed security architecture, functionalities and security measures based on modern blockchain solutions developed for the CHRISS project.
The CHRISS project proposes an innovative solution that comes to increase the robustness of synchronization signal distribution mechanisms in telecommunications networks. The proposed solution allows a superior monitoring of the operation of synchronization signal distribution equipment in telecommunications networks, equipment generically called TSU (Time Synchronization Unit). These equipment generically contain a GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) signal reception system from which the time reference is extracted through a complex procedure and a complex mechanism for transmitting these signals on SFP (Small Form-factor Pluggable) optical ports using the specific PTP (Precision Time Protocol) protocols. Robust and detailed monitoring of the operation of TSU equipment in the context of the existence of a hostile operating environment that implies the possibility of jamming or interference attacks, spoofing or dedicated cyber-attacks is vital. Affecting the operation of this equipment entails disruption to the operation of an entire telecommunications network. This is possible because these systems contribute directly to the network-wide distribution of the synchronization signal.
By leveraging the inherent characteristics of blockchain solutions, such as immutability, decentralization, and cryptographic security, the proposed security architecture increases the resilience and security of time distribution services, thereby mitigating the associated risks.
This paper describes the relationship between blockchain-based security architecture and the specific manner of monitoring and protecting TSU equipment.

References

[1]
Mahmoud Abbasi, Javier Prieto, Amin Shahraki, and Juan M Corchado. 2023. Industrial data monetization: A blockchain-based industrial IoT data trading system. Internet of Things 24 (2023), 100959.
[2]
Ömer Aslan, Semih Serkant Aktuğ, Merve Ozkan-Okay, Abdullah Asim Yilmaz, and Erdal Akin. 2023. A comprehensive review of cyber security vulnerabilities, threats, attacks, and solutions. Electronics 12, 6 (2023), 1333.
[3]
Zijian Bao, Min Luo, Huaqun Wang, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo, and Debiao He. 2021. Blockchain-based secure communication for space information networks. IEEE Network 35, 4 (2021), 50–57.
[4]
Badr Bellaj, Aafaf Ouaddah, Emmanuel Bertin, Noel Crespi, and Abdellatif Mezrioui. 2024. Drawing the boundaries between Blockchain and Blockchain-like systems: A Comprehensive Survey on distributed Ledger Technologies. Proc. IEEE 112, 3 (2024), 247–299.
[5]
Abu Faisal and Mohammad Zulkernine. 2021. A secure architecture for TCP/UDP-based cloud communications. International Journal of Information Security 20, 2 (2021), 161–179.
[6]
Emanuela Falletti, Davide Margaria, Gianluca Marucco, Beatrice Motella, Mario Nicola, and Marco Pini. 2018. Synchronization of critical infrastructures dependent upon GNSS: Current vulnerabilities and protection provided by new signals. IEEE Systems Journal 13, 3 (2018), 2118–2129.
[7]
Kai Fan, Shili Sun, Zheng Yan, Qiang Pan, Hui Li, and Yintang Yang. 2019. A blockchain-based clock synchronization scheme in IoT. Future Generation Computer Systems 101 (2019), 524–533.
[8]
Paavni Gaur and A Kaushik. 2021. AES image encryption (Advanced encryption standard). International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, 12 (2021), 1357–1363.
[9]
Tikshala Gothankar. 2022. Blockchain’s Value Addition in Network Industry: A multi-case study in electricity and telecommunications industry. Master’s thesis. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.
[10]
Nahida Islam, Md Sazzadur Rahman, Imtiaz Mahmud, Md Nur Amin Sifat, and You-Ze Cho. 2022. A blockchain-enabled distributed advanced metering infrastructure secure communication (BC-AMI). Applied Sciences 12, 14 (2022), 7274.
[11]
Minjae Kang, Sungbin Park, and Yeonjoon Lee. 2024. A Survey on Satellite Communication System Security. Sensors 24, 9 (2024), 2897.
[12]
Seth Djanie Kotey, Eric Tutu Tchao, Abdul-Rahman Ahmed, Andrew Selasi Agbemenu, Henry Nunoo-Mensah, Axel Sikora, Dominik Welte, and Eliel Keelson. 2023. Blockchain interoperability: the state of heterogenous blockchain-to-blockchain communication. IET Communications 17, 8 (2023), 891–914.
[13]
Ashish Kumbhare, Piyush Kumar Thakur, B Ravi Kiran Patnaik, and Kiran Midiyam. 2023. Blockchain’s Data Integrity and Reliability. In Building Secure Business Models Through Blockchain Technology: Tactics, Methods, Limitations, and Performance. IGI Global, 231–250.
[14]
Diana Mitsova, Alka Sapat, Ann-Margaret Esnard, and Alberto J Lamadrid. 2020. Evaluating the impact of infrastructure interdependencies on the emergency services sector and critical support functions using an expert opinion survey. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 26, 2 (2020), 04020015.
[15]
Marco Pini, Alex Minetto, Andrea Vesco, Diana Berbecaru, Luis Miguel Contreras Murillo, Pierre Nemry, Ivan De Francesca, Benoit Rat, and Krel Callewaert. 2021. Satellite-derived time for enhanced telecom networks synchronization: the root project. In 2021 IEEE 8th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace). IEEE, 288–293.
[16]
Eugenia Politou, Fran Casino, Efthimios Alepis, and Constantinos Patsakis. 2019. Blockchain mutability: Challenges and proposed solutions. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 9, 4 (2019), 1972–1986.
[17]
Hugo Riggs, Shahid Tufail, Imtiaz Parvez, Mohd Tariq, Mohammed Aquib Khan, Asham Amir, Kedari Vineetha Vuda, and Arif I Sarwat. 2023. Impact, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies for cyber-secure critical infrastructure. Sensors 23, 8 (2023), 4060.
[18]
George Suciu, Mari-Anais Sachian, Marius Vochin, Marius Dobrea, Cristian Beceanu, Raluca Iosu, and Ana Petrache. 2019. Blockchain applicability using smart power management: Sealedgrid architecture. In 2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe). IEEE, 1–5.

Index Terms

  1. Multimodal Security Mechanisms for Critical Time Systems using blockchain in Chriss project

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ARES '24: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
    July 2024
    2032 pages
    ISBN:9798400717185
    DOI:10.1145/3664476
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 July 2024

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Blockchain
    2. Critical infrastructures
    3. Cyber-attacks mitigation
    4. EGNSS
    5. Robust security
    6. Synchronization solutions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    • HORIZON-EUSPA-2021-SPACE - CHRISS project

    Conference

    ARES 2024

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 228 of 451 submissions, 51%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 10
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media