skip to main content
10.1145/3450741.3465243acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making Meals Both Appealing and Healthy: A Food Presentation Simulation System

Published: 22 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

“You eat with your eyes first.” Marcus Gavius Apicius, the insightful first-century Roman gourmand, stated. Although arranging foods in attractive ways can increase one’s appetite, creating an aesthetic food presentation is challenging. For instance, users have to cut ingredients into pieces of specific shapes and sizes, while imagining the overall appearance of their desired composition. To overcome such challenges, we introduce a system that assists users to arrange ingredients to present appealing patterns in meals. The system enables them to perform a process of trial-and-error in the simulation prior to creating a real food presentation. Due to machines’ high computing power, our automatic simulation provides users with a variety of food presentation results and inspires their creativity accordingly. It also computes the nutritional composition of each simulated food presentation so that both visual quality and health are considered simultaneously. Results demonstrate that the simulated food presentations are visually appealing and could be physically created. Participants who joined the user study also favored our food presentation simulation system.

References

[1]
Anonymous. 1982. Welche Thiere gleichen einander am meisten?Fliegende Blätter. Munich: Braun & Schneider (1982), 17.
[2]
Yuri Boykov and Gareth Funka-Lea. 2006. Graph cuts and efficient ND image segmentation. International journal of computer vision 70, 2 (2006), 109–131.
[3]
Jaehyeong Cho, Wataru Shimoda, and Keiji Yanai. 2019. Ramen As You Like: Sketch-based food image generation and editing. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 2217–2218.
[4]
JF Delwiche and Marcia Levin Pelchat. 2002. Influence of glass shape on wine aroma. Journal of sensory studies 17, 1 (2002), 19–28.
[5]
Jeannine F Delwiche. 2012. You eat with your eyes first. Physiology & behavior 107, 4 (2012), 502–504.
[6]
Ran Gal, Olga Sorkine, Tiberiu Popa, Alla Sheffer, and Daniel Cohen-Or. 2007. 3D collage: expressive non-realistic modeling. In International Symposium on Non-photorealistic Animation and Rendering. 7–14.
[7]
Stas Goferman, Ayellet Tal, and Lihi Zelnik-Manor. 2010. Puzzle-like collage. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 29. 459–468.
[8]
Gaetano Kanizsa. 1955. Margini quasi-percettivi in campi con stimolazione omogenea. Rivista di psicologia 49, 1 (1955), 7–30.
[9]
Yu-Kun Lai, Shi-Min Hu, and Ralph R Martin. 2009. Automatic and topology-preserving gradient mesh generation for image vectorization. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 28. 85.
[10]
James R Lewis. 1995. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7, 1(1995), 57–78.
[11]
Harry McGurk and John MacDonald. 1976. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264, 5588 (1976), 746–748.
[12]
Charles Michel, Carlos Velasco, Paul Fraemohs, and Charles Spence. 2015. Studying the impact of plating on ratings of the food served in a naturalistic dining context. Appetite 90(2015), 45–50.
[13]
Charles Michel, Carlos Velasco, Elia Gatti, and Charles Spence. 2014. A taste of Kandinsky: assessing the influence of the artistic visual presentation of food on the dining experience. Flavour 3, 1 (2014), 7.
[14]
Gil Morrot, Frédéric Brochet, and Denis Dubourdieu. 2001. The color of odors. Brain and language 79, 2 (2001), 309–320.
[15]
F Müller-Lyer. 1889. Optische Urteilstäuschungen, du Bois Arch. Suppl. S 263(1889).
[16]
Rose M Pangborn, Harold W Berg, and Brenda Hansen. 1963. The influence of color on discrimination of sweetness in dry table-wine. The american journal of psychology 76, 3 (1963), 492–495.
[17]
Carsten Rother, Lucas Bordeaux, Youssef Hamadi, and Andrew Blake. 2006. Autocollage. In ACM transactions on graphics, Vol. 25. 847–852.
[18]
Szymon Rusinkiewicz and Marc Levoy. 2001. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In 3dim, Vol. 1. 145–152.
[19]
Charles Spence, Katsunori Okajima, Adrian David Cheok, Olivia Petit, and Charles Michel. 2016. Eating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation. Brain and cognition 110(2016), 53–63.
[20]
Charles Spence and Betina Piqueras-Fiszman. 2014. The perfect meal: the multisensory science of food and dining.
[21]
Charles Spence, Betina Piqueras-Fiszman, Charles Michel, and Ophelia Deroy. 2014. Plating manifesto (II): the art and science of plating. Flavour 3, 1 (2014), 4.
[22]
Jian Sun, Lin Liang, Fang Wen, and Heung-Yeung Shum. 2007. Image vectorization using optimized gradient meshes. In ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 26. 11.
[23]
Laura N van der Laan, Denise TD De Ridder, Max A Viergever, and Paul AM Smeets. 2011. The first taste is always with the eyes: a meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues. Neuroimage 55, 1 (2011), 296–303.
[24]
Francesca Zampollo, Kevin M Kniffin, Brian Wansink, and Mitsuru Shimizu. 2012. Food plating preferences of children: The importance of presentation on desire for diversity. Acta Paediatrica 101, 1 (2012), 61–66.
[25]
Debra A Zellner, Christopher R Loss, Jonathan Zearfoss, and Sergio Remolina. 2014. It tastes as good as it looks! The effect of food presentation on liking for the flavor of food. Appetite 77(2014), 31–35.
[26]
Debra A Zellner, Evan Siemers, Vincenzo Teran, Rebecca Conroy, Mia Lankford, Alexis Agrafiotis, Lisa Ambrose, and Paul Locher. 2011. Neatness counts. How plating affects liking for the taste of food. Appetite 57, 3 (2011), 642–648.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
C&C '21: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Creativity and Cognition
June 2021
581 pages
ISBN:9781450383769
DOI:10.1145/3450741
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Food presentation
  2. interaction
  3. nutrition
  4. simulation

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

C&C '21
Sponsor:
C&C '21: Creativity and Cognition
June 22 - 23, 2021
Virtual Event, Italy

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 132
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media