research-article

Open access

Faculty Views on the Goals of an Undergraduate CS Education and the Academia-Industry Gap

Authors:

Sander Valstar,

Sophia Krause-Levy,

Alexandra Macedo,

William G. Griswold,

Leo PorterAuthors Info & Claims

SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Pages 577 - 583

https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366834

Published: 26 February 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Previous work has found that recent computer science graduates often experience difficulty transitioning into their new roles in industry due to a significant gap between their academic experiences and industry's expectations. Although multiple studies have identified the views of students and members of industry on the value of a CS degree as preparation for industry, the faculty perspective on this topic remains unclear. Understanding these views could shed light on why the academia-industry gap has persisted despite the attention. This study identified faculty views on the goals of an undergraduate education and a CS major, focusing on preparation for careers in industry. In order to identify a spectrum of faculty views, we interviewed 14 faculty from a variety of backgrounds across three institutions. A phenomenographic analysis of the transcripts reveals that many faculty believe that industry preparation is an important programmatic goal, yet they encounter significant resource obstacles to achieving that goal.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (cser229aux.zip)

pdf file with the questions used during the interviews.

Download
73.50 KB

References

[1]

2019. Interview Questions. (accessed Oct. 2019). https://paperdata.page.link/ faculty-interview-questions

[2]

2019. University Data -- Data USA. (accessed Oct. 2019). https://datausa.io

[3]

Gerlese S. Åkerlind. 2005. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development 24, 4 (2005), 321--334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284672

[4]

Amnah Alshahrani, Isla Ross, and Murray I. Wood. 2018. Using Social Cognitive Career Theory to Understand Why Students Choose to Study Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 205--214. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3230977.3230994

Digital Library

[5]

Andrew Begel and Beth Simon. 2008. Struggles of New College Graduates in Their First Software Development Job. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 226--230. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352218

Digital Library

[6]

Angela Carbone, Linda Mannila, and Sue Fitzgerald. 2007. Computer science and IT teachers' conceptions of successful and unsuccessful teaching: A phenomenographic study. Computer Science Education 17, 4 (2007), 275--299. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08993400701706586 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08993400701706586

[7]

Secil Caskurlu, Iryna Ashby, and Marisa Exter. 2017. The Alignment Between Formal Education and Software Design Professionals' Needs in Industry: Faculty Perception. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. ASEE Conferences, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28941.

[8]

Michelle Craig, Phill Conrad, Dylan Lynch, Natasha Lee, and Laura Anthony. 2018. Listening to Early Career Software Developers. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 33, 4 (April 2018), 138--149. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3199572.3199591

[9]

Sharon Gedye, Elizabeth Fender, and Brian Chalkley. 2004. Students' Undergraduate Expectations and Post-graduation Experiences of the Value of a Degree. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 28, 3 (2004), 381--396. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309826042000286956

[10]

C. Richard G. Helps, Robert B. Jackson, and Marshall B. Romney. 2005. Student Expectations of Computing Majors. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 101--106. https://doi.org/10.1145/1095714.1095739

Digital Library

[11]

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula and IEEE Computer Society. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2534860

Digital Library

[12]

Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS Undergraduate Students' Professional Development Through the Lens of Internship Experiences. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 852--858. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287408

Digital Library

[13]

Päivi Kinnunen and Beth Simon. 2012. Phenomenography and grounded theory as research methods in computing education research field. Computer Science Education 22, 2 (2012), 199--218. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.692928 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2012.692928

[14]

Wolfgang Lehmann. 2009. University as vocational education: working-class students' expectations for university. British Journal of Sociology of Education 30, 2 (2009), 137--149. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802700164

[15]

Timothy C. Lethbridge. 1999. The Relevance of Software Education: A Survey and Some Recommendations. Ann. Softw. Eng. 6, 1--4 (April 1999), 91--110. https: //doi.org/10.1023/A:1018917700997

[16]

Clayton Lewis. 2007. Attitudes and Beliefs About Computer Science Among Students and Faculty. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 2 (June 2007), 37--41. https://doi.org/10. 1145/1272848.1272880

Digital Library

[17]

Clayton Lewis, Michele H. Jackson, and William M. Waite. 2010. Student and Faculty Attitudes and Beliefs About Computer Science. Commun. ACM 53, 5 (May 2010), 78--85. https://doi.org/10.1145/1735223.1735244

Digital Library

[18]

Marcia A. Mardis, Jinxuan Ma, Faye R. Jones, Chandrahasa R. Ambavarapu, Heather M. Kelleher, Laura I. Spears, and Charles R. McClure. 2018. Assessing alignment between information technology educational opportunities, professional requirements, and industry demands. Education and Information Technologies 23, 4 (01 Jul 2018), 1547--1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017--9678-y

[19]

Ference Marton. 1981. Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science 10, 2 (jul 1981), 177--200. https://doi.org/10.1007/ bf00132516

[20]

C. Norton and T. Martini. 2017. Perceived Benefits of an Undergraduate Degree. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (2017).

[21]

Jacob Perrenet. 2009. Differences in Beliefs and Attitudes About Computer Science Among Students and Faculty of the Bachelor Program. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 129--133. https://doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1562920

Digital Library

[22]

Anne-Kathrin Peters, Anders Berglund, Anna Eckerdal, and Arnold Pears. 2015. Second Year Computer Science and IT Students' Experience of Participation in the Discipline. In Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--76. https: //doi.org/10.1145/2828959.2828962

Digital Library

[23]

R. Pham, S. Kiesling, L. Singer, and K. Schneider. 2016. Onboarding inexperienced developers: struggles and perceptions regarding automated testing. Software Quality Journal 25, 4 (2016), 1239--1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-016--9333--7

[24]

Alex Radermacher and Gursimran Walia. 2013. Gaps Between Industry Expectations and the Abilities of Graduates. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 525--530. https://doi.org/10.1145/2445196.2445351

Digital Library

[25]

Alex Radermacher, Gursimran Walia, and Dean Knudson. 2014. Investigating the Skill Gap Between Graduating Students and Industry Expectations. In Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE Companion 2014). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 291--300. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2591062.2591159

Digital Library

[26]

Simon, Michael de Raadt, Ken Sutton, and Anne Venables. 2006. The Distinctive Role of Lab Practical Classes in Computing Education. In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research: Koli Calling 2006 (Baltic Sea '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 54--60. https://doi.org/10.1145/1315803. 1315814

[27]

Leigh Ann Sudol and Ciera Jaspan. 2010. Analyzing the Strength of Undergraduate Misconceptions About Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ICER '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/1839594.1839601

Digital Library

[28]

Anna Wilson, Susan Howitt, Pam Roberts, Gerlese Ãkerlind, and Kate Wilson. 2013. Connecting expectations and experiences of students in a research-immersive degree. Studies in Higher Education 38, 10 (2013), 1562--1576. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.633163 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.633163

Cited By

Darling-Wolf HPatitsas E(2024)"Not my Priority:" Ethics and the Boundaries of Computer Science Identities in Undergraduate CS EducationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410138:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641013
Cazalas JRoberson CFurqan ZStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)From Degree to Developer: The Creation and Evolution of a CS Course Designed to Bridge the Academia-Industry GapProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630860(186-192)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630860
Lau SGuo P(2023)From "Ban It Till We Understand It" to "Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub CopilotProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600138(106-121)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568813.3600138
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Faculty Views on the Goals of an Undergraduate CS Education and the Academia-Industry Gap
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        Software engineering education

Recommendations

A Quantitative Study of Faculty Views on the Goals of an Undergraduate CS Program and Preparing Students for Industry
ICER '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

Although elements of the academia-industry gap have been studied extensively, these studies have mostly ignored the primary stakeholder for changing academia: faculty. Building on a recent qualitative study that revealed a wide range of faculty views on ...
Closing the Academia-Industry Gap in Undergraduate CS
ICER '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

Previous studies have shown that the transition of recent CS graduates into their first jobs in industry is often not as smooth as one might expect. The difficulties they face are the result of a significant gap between industry expectations and their ...
Design and Evaluation of "The Missing CS Class," a Student-led Undergraduate Course to Reduce the Academia-industry Gap
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 1

One notable part of the academia-industry gap is the deficiency in computing ecosystem literacy, which may result in college graduates exhibiting little technical knowledge of software development tools and practices commonly used in industry. This ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

February 2020

1502 pages

ISBN:9781450367936

DOI:10.1145/3328778

General Chairs:
Jian Zhang
Texas Woman's University, USA
,
Mark Sherriff
University of Virginia, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Sarah Heckman
North Carolina State University, USA
,
Pamela Cutter
Kalamazoo College, USA
,
Alvaro Monge
California State University, Long Beach, USA

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 February 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

NSF

Conference

SIGCSE '20

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

SIGCSE '20: The 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

March 11 - 14, 2020

OR, Portland, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025

Sponsor:
sigcse

The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

February 26 - March 1, 2025

Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

11
Total Citations
View Citations
981
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)234
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27

Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Darling-Wolf HPatitsas E(2024)"Not my Priority:" Ethics and the Boundaries of Computer Science Identities in Undergraduate CS EducationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410138:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641013
Cazalas JRoberson CFurqan ZStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)From Degree to Developer: The Creation and Evolution of a CS Course Designed to Bridge the Academia-Industry GapProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630860(186-192)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630860
Lau SGuo P(2023)From "Ban It Till We Understand It" to "Resistance is Futile": How University Programming Instructors Plan to Adapt as More Students Use AI Code Generation and Explanation Tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub CopilotProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600138(106-121)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568813.3600138
Stamm SDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Desired Qualifications Sought in Entry Level Software EngineersProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569849(854-860)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569849
Krause-Levy SSalguero ALim RMcTavish HTrajkovic JPorter LGriswold WDoyle MStephenson BDorn BSoh LBattestilli L(2023)Instructor Perspectives on Prerequisite Courses in ComputingProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569787(277-283)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3545945.3569787
Vo NVu NVu TVu QMach BPéraire CSerebrenik A(2022)CRSProceedings of the ACM/IEEE 44th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training10.1145/3510456.3514141(62-68)Online publication date: 21-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3510456.3514141
Kross SGuo PMerkle LDoyle MSheard JSoh LDorn B(2022)Five Pedagogical Principles of a User-Centered Design Course that Prepares Computing Undergraduates for Industry JobsProceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - Volume 110.1145/3478431.3499341(168-174)Online publication date: 22-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3478431.3499341
Alabdulkarim YAlmukaynizi MAlmaymoni MAlhadlag AAlsalamah SAlsalamah H(2021)Saudi Undergraduate Computing Programs in Light of the 2020 Curricula ReportInternational Journal of Education and Information Technologies10.46300/9109.2021.15.1415(137-146)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2021
https://doi.org/10.46300/9109.2021.15.14
Kashupi TChikohora E(2021)Using NLP to bridge Data Science Skills Gap in Namibia. A Survey2021 3rd International Multidisciplinary Information Technology and Engineering Conference (IMITEC)10.1109/IMITEC52926.2021.9714682(1-6)Online publication date: 23-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/IMITEC52926.2021.9714682
Delane RHaynes S(2021)An Approach to Developing Competency Models for Programming Courses2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637348(1-5)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637348
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents