poster

Open access

Evaluating Soft Organ-Shaped Tangibles for Medical Virtual Reality

Authors:

Thomas Muender,

Anke Verena Reinschluessel,

Daniela Salzmann,

Rainer MalakaAuthors Info & Claims

CHI EA '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

Article No.: 237, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519715

Published: 28 April 2022 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Connecting digital information with the physical is one of the essential ideas of tangible user interfaces. The design of the physical representation is important especially for specialised domains like surgery planning, because surgeons rely heavily on their tactile senses. Therefore, this research work investigates the effect of a soft and a hard 3D model as an interaction device for virtual reality surgical planning. A user study with 13 surgeons reveals a clear preference for the softer, more realistic material and a significantly higher haptic user experience for the soft model compared to the hard one. These results advocate for stressing material aspects along with the interaction design in domains with an inherently high focus on tactile aspects.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (3491101.3519715-video-figure.mp4)

Video Figure

Download
15.95 MB

MP4 File (3491101.3519715-talk-video.mp4)

Talk Video

Download
5.10 MB

References

[1]

Lonni Besançon, Anders Ynnerman, Daniel F. Keefe, Lingyun Yu, and Tobias Isenberg. 2021. The State of the Art of Spatial Interfaces for 3D Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum n/a, n/a (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14189 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.14189

[2]

Christian Boedecker, Florentine Huettl, Patrick Saalfeld, Markus Paschold, Werner Kneist, Janine Baumgart, Bernhard Preim, Christian Hansen, Hauke Lang, and Tobias Huber. 2021. Using virtual 3D-models in surgical planning: workflow of an immersive virtual reality application in liver surgery. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery 406, 3 (2021), 911–915.

[3]

Alberto Boem, Yuuki Enzaki, Hiroaki Yano, and Hiroo Iwata. 2019. Human Perception of a Haptic Shape-changing Interface with Variable Rigidity and Size. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, NY, USA, 858–859. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798214

[4]

A. Bornik, R. Beichel, E. Kruijff, B. Reitinger, and D. Schmalstieg. 2006. A Hybrid User Interface for Manipulation of Volumetric Medical Data. In 3D User Interfaces (3DUI’06). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, NY, USA, 29–36.

[5]

Elodie Bouzbib, Gilles Bailly, Sinan Haliyo, and Pascal Frey. 2021. ”Can I Touch This?”: Survey of Virtual Reality Interactions via Haptic Solutions. CoRR abs/2101.11278(2021), 16 pages. arxiv:2101.11278https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.11278

[6]

John Brooke. 1996. SUS - A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, London, England.

[7]

Vuthea Chheang, Patrick Saalfeld, Tobias Huber, Florentine Huettl, Werner Kneist, Bernhard Preim, and Christian Hansen. 2019. Collaborative Virtual Reality for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery Training. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, NY, USA, 1–17.

[8]

Vuthea Chheang, Patrick Saalfeld, Fabian Joeres, Christian Boedecker, Tobias Huber, Florentine Huettl, Hauke Lang, Bernhard Preim, and Christian Hansen. 2021. A collaborative virtual reality environment for liver surgery planning. Computers & Graphics 99(2021), 234–246.

Digital Library

[9]

Tanja Döring. 2016. The Interaction Material Profile: Understanding and Inspiring How Physical Materials Shape Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2446–2453. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892516

Digital Library

[10]

Tanja Döring. 2016. A Materials Perspective on Human-Computer Interaction : Case Studies on Tangible, Gestural, and Ephemeral User Interfaces. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Bremen, Dissertation, 2016, Bremen. https://suche.suub.uni-bremen.de/peid=B101120109 XIII, 328 Seiten : Illustrationen.

[11]

Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

[12]

Ferran Fillat-Gomà, Francesc Antoni Marcano-Fernández, Sergi Coderch-Navarro, Laia Martínez-Carreres, and Alex Berenguer. 2021. 3D printing innovation: New insights into upper extremity surgery planning. Injury 52(2021), S117–S124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.048 Spanish Orthopaedic Trauma.

[13]

Danilo Gasques, Janet G. Johnson, Tommy Sharkey, Yuanyuan Feng, Ru Wang, Zhuoqun Robin Xu, Enrique Zavala, Yifei Zhang, Wanze Xie, Xinming Zhang, Konrad Davis, Michael Yip, and Nadir Weibel. 2021. ARTEMIS: A Collaborative Mixed-Reality System for Immersive Surgical Telementoring. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445576

Digital Library

[14]

Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology 52 (1988), 139–183.

[15]

Ken Hinckley, Randy Pausch, John C. Goble, and Neal F. Kassell. 1994. Passive Real-world Interface Props for Neurosurgical Visualization. In Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, Massachusetts, USA) (CHI ’94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 232–. https://doi.org/10.1145/259963.260443

Digital Library

[16]

Edwin L Hutchins, James D Hollan, and Donald A Norman. 1985. Direct manipulation interfaces. Human–computer interaction 1, 4 (1985), 311–338.

Digital Library

[17]

Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715

Digital Library

[18]

Robert J.K. Jacob, Audrey Girouard, Leanne M. Hirshfield, Michael S. Horn, Orit Shaer, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Jamie Zigelbaum. 2008. Reality-based Interaction: A Framework for post-WIMP Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357089

Digital Library

[19]

Heekyoung Jung and Erik Stolterman. 2010. Material Probe: Exploring Materiality of Digital Artifacts. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Funchal, Portugal) (TEI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935731

Digital Library

[20]

Konstantina Kilteni, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 21, 4 (Dec. 2012), 373–387.

Digital Library

[21]

Franklin King, Jagadeesan Jayender, Sharath K Bhagavatula, Paul B Shyn, Steve Pieper, Tina Kapur, Andras Lasso, and Gabor Fichtinger. 2016. An immersive virtual reality environment for diagnostic imaging. Journal of Medical Robotics Research 1, 01 (2016), 1640003.

[22]

Scott R Klemmer, Björn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142429

Digital Library

[23]

Chi-Jung Lee, Hsin-Ruey Tsai, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2021. HairTouch: Providing Stiffness, Roughness and Surface Height Differences Using Reconfigurable Brush Hairs on a VR Controller. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 133, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445285

Digital Library

[24]

James R. Lewis, Brian S. Utesch, and Deborah E. Maher. 2013. UMUX-LITE: When There’s No Time for the SUS. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2099–2102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481287

Digital Library

[25]

James R. Lewis, Brian S. Utesch, and Deborah E. Maher. 2015. Investigating the Correspondence Between UMUX-LITE and SUS Scores. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 204–211.

[26]

James R Lewis, Brian S Utesch, and Deborah E Maher. 2015. Investigating the correspondence between umux-lite and sus scores. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Discourse, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer, Cham, 204–211.

[27]

Alessandro Marro, Taha Bandukwala, and Walter Mak. 2016. Three-dimensional printing and medical imaging: a review of the methods and applications. Current problems in diagnostic radiology 45, 1 (2016), 2–9.

[28]

Nicolas Martelli, Carole Serrano, Hèlène van den Brink, Judith Pineau, Patrice Prognon, Isabelle Borget, and Salma El Batti. 2016. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: Asystematic review. Surgery 159, 6 (2016), 1485 – 1500.

[29]

John P McIntire, Paul R Havig, and Eric E Geiselman. 2012. What is 3D good for? A review of human performance on stereoscopic 3D displays. In Head-and Helmet-Mounted Displays XVII; and Display Technologies and Applications for Defense, Security, and Avionics VI, Vol. 8383. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, Baltimore, MD, USA, 83830X.

[30]

Thomas Muender, Anke V. Reinschluessel, Sean Drewes, Dirk Wenig, Tanja Döring, and Rainer Malaka. 2019. Does It Feel Real?: Using Tangibles with Different Fidelities to Build and Explore Scenes in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 673, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300903

Digital Library

[31]

Asier Muguruza Blanco, Lucas Krauel, and F Fenollosa. 2018. Development of a patients-specific 3D-printed preoperative planning and training tool, with functionalized internal surfaces, for complex oncologic cases. Rapid Prototyping Journal 25 (10 2018).

[32]

Benjamin C. Mac Murray, Bryan N. Peele, Patricia Xu, Josef Spjut, Omer Shapira, David Luebke, and Robert F. Shepherd. 2018. A variable shape and variable stiffness controller for haptic virtual interactions. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), New York, NY, USA, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2018.8404930

[33]

Daniela Petrelli, Alessandro Soranzo, Luigina Ciolfi, and John Reidy. 2016. Exploring the Aesthetics of Tangible Interaction: Experiments on the Perception of Hybrid Objects. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839478

Digital Library

[34]

R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

[35]

A. Reinschluessel, R. Fischer, C. Schumann, V. Uslar, T. Muender, U. Katzky, H. Kißner, V. Kraft, M. Lampe, T. Lück, K. Bock-Müller, H. Nopper, S. Pelzl, D. Wenig, A. Schenk, D. Weyhe, G. Zachmann, and R. Malaka. 2019. Introducing Virtual & 3D-Printed Models for Improved Collaboration in Surgery. In Proceedings of the 18. Annual Meeting of the German Society of Computer- and Robot-Assisted Surgery, Oliver Burgert (Ed.). Vol. 18. Deutsche Gesellschaft für die Computer-und Roboterassistierte Chirurgie e.V., Stuttgart, Germany, 253–258.

[36]

Anke V. Reinschluessel, Thomas Muender, Tanja Döring, Verena Uslar, Thomas Lück, Dirk Weyhe, Andrea Schenk, and Rainer Malaka. 2021. A Study on the Size of Tangible Organ-Shaped Controllers for Exploring Medical Data in VR. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (CHI ’21 Extended Abstracts). ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7.

Digital Library

[37]

Anke V. Reinschluessel, Thomas Muender, Verena Uslar, Dirk Weyhe, Andrea Schenk, and Rainer Malaka. 2019. Tangible Organs: Introducing 3D Printed Organ Models with VR to Interact with Medical 3D Models. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW1816, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3313029

Digital Library

[38]

Anke Verena Reinschluessel, Joern Teuber, Marc Herrlich, Jeffrey Bissel, Melanie van Eikeren, Johannes Ganser, Felicia Koeller, Fenja Kollasch, Thomas Mildner, Luca Raimondo, 2017. Virtual reality for user-centered design and evaluation of touch-free interaction techniques for navigating medical images in the operating room. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2001–2009.

Digital Library

[39]

B. Reitinger, A. Bornik, R. Beichel, and D. Schmalstieg. 2006. Liver Surgery Planning Using Virtual Reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 6 (11 2006), 36–47.

[40]

A. Schenk, S. Zidowitz, H. Bourquain, M. Hindennach, C. Hansen, H.K. Hahn, and H.-O. Peitgen. 2008. Clinical relevance of model based computer-assisted diagnosis and therapy, In Medical Imaging 2008: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE 6915, 691502–1–691502–19. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.780270

[41]

Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2017. Construction of a Benchmark for the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell. 4, 4 (2017), 40–44.

[42]

Martin Schrepp and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2019. Design and Validation of a Framework for the Creation of User Experience Questionnaires. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia & Artificial Intelligence 5, 7 (2019).

[43]

Maurício Sousa, Daniel Mendes, Soraia Paulo, Nuno Matela, Joaquim Jorge, and Daniel Simões Lopes. 2017. VRRRRoom: Virtual Reality for Radiologists in the Reading Room. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 4057–4062.

Digital Library

[44]

Jessica Tsimeris, Duncan Stevenson, Tom Gedeon, and Matt Adcock. 2013. Using ForceForm, a Dynamically Deformable Interactive Surface, for Palpation Simulation in Medical Scenarios. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Smart Material Interfaces: Another Step to a Material Future (Sydney, Australia) (SMI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2534688.2534693

Digital Library

[45]

C Lee Ventola. 2014. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharmacy and Therapeutics 39, 10 (2014), 704.

[46]

Nadir Weibel, Danilo Gasques, Janet Johnson, Thomas Sharkey, Zhuoqun Robin Xu, Xinming Zhang, Enrique Zavala, Michael Yip, and Konrad Davis. 2020. ARTEMIS: Mixed-Reality Environment for Immersive Surgical Telementoring. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4.

[47]

Mikael Wiberg. 2018. The Materiality of Interaction: Notes on the Materials of Interaction Design. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Digital Library

[48]

Nizar N. Zein, Ibrahim A. Hanouneh, Paul D. Bishop, Maggie Samaan, Bijan Eghtesad, Cristiano Quintini, Charles Miller, Lisa Yerian, and Ryan Klatte. 2013. Three-dimensional print of a liver for preoperative planning in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 19, 12 (2013), 1304–1310.

Cited By

Weyhe DHartmann VUslar VTabriz N(2025)Augmented und Virtual Reality in der Chirurgie: Einsatzgebiete und explorative Studien am Beispiel von VIVATOPAugmented and virtual reality in surgery: fields of application and exploratory studies exemplified by VIVATOPDie Chirurgie10.1007/s00104-024-02218-3Online publication date: 3-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02218-3
Dube TArif A(2024)Free-Hand Input and Interaction in Virtual Reality Using a Custom Force-Based Digital ThimbleApplied Sciences10.3390/app14231101814:23(11018)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311018
Vasylevska KGhazanfari MSharifmoghaddam KMortezapoor SVonach EBrument HNawratil GKaufmann H(2024)Stiffness Simulation with Haptic Feedback Using Robotic Gripper and Paper Origami as End-Effector2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00015(48-53)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00015
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Versatile Immersive Virtual and Augmented Tangible OR – Using VR, AR and Tangibles to Support Surgical Practice
CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Immersive technologies such as virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), in combination with advanced image segmentation and visualization, have considerable potential to improve and support a surgeon’s work. We demonstrate a solution to help ...
A collaborative virtual reality environment for liver surgery planning
Highlights
- Immersive VR environment for shared or remote collaboration among surgeons in tumor surgery planning on the example of liver surgery.
- Virtual resection, resection margins, and real-time risk map visualization are presented.
- ...
Graphical abstract

Display Omitted

Abstract
Surgical planning software is a key component in the treatment of tumor diseases. However, desktop-based systems provide only limited visualization and interaction opportunities. Moreover, collaborative planning among members of a surgical team ...
Exploring Virtual Reality Surgical Planning Applications in Paediatric Orthopaedics: A Preliminary Case Study
Extended Reality
Abstract
The incorporation of immersive technologies such as virtual reality into medical settings, particularly in the context of preoperative planning, has the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of surgical procedures. This preliminary ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2022

3066 pages

ISBN:9781450391566

DOI:10.1145/3491101

Editors:
Simone Barbosa
PUC-Rio, Brazil
,
Cliff Lampe
University of Michigan, USA
,
Caroline Appert
Université Paris-Saclay, France
,
David A. Shamma
Toyota Research Institute, USA

Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 April 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

Conference

CHI '22

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 29 - May 5, 2022

LA, New Orleans, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
752
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)247
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Weyhe DHartmann VUslar VTabriz N(2025)Augmented und Virtual Reality in der Chirurgie: Einsatzgebiete und explorative Studien am Beispiel von VIVATOPAugmented and virtual reality in surgery: fields of application and exploratory studies exemplified by VIVATOPDie Chirurgie10.1007/s00104-024-02218-3Online publication date: 3-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02218-3
Dube TArif A(2024)Free-Hand Input and Interaction in Virtual Reality Using a Custom Force-Based Digital ThimbleApplied Sciences10.3390/app14231101814:23(11018)Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311018
Vasylevska KGhazanfari MSharifmoghaddam KMortezapoor SVonach EBrument HNawratil GKaufmann H(2024)Stiffness Simulation with Haptic Feedback Using Robotic Gripper and Paper Origami as End-Effector2024 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00015(48-53)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW62533.2024.00015
Krieger KEgger JKleesiek JGunzer MChen J(2024)Multisensory Extended Reality Applications Offer Benefits for Volumetric Biomedical Image Analysis in Research and MedicineJournal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine10.1007/s10278-024-01094-xOnline publication date: 11-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01094-x
Weyhe DUslar VSalzmann D(2024)Virtual-, Extended- und Augmented-Reality: die robotische Chirurgie der ZukunftRoboterassistierte Hernienchirurgie10.1007/978-3-662-68686-7_77(589-595)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68686-7_77
Bouzbib EPacchierotti CLécuyer A(2023)When Tangibles Become Deformable: Studying Pseudo-Stiffness Perceptual Thresholds in a VR Grasping TaskIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.324708329:5(2743-2752)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3247083
Reinschluessel AZagermann J(2023)Exploring Hybrid User Interfaces for Surgery Planning2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00048(208-210)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct60411.2023.00048

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents