skip to main content
10.1145/3235765.3235767acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Documenting trajectories in design space: a methodology for applied game design research

Published: 07 August 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Recent years have borne witness to an explosion of games research from diverse home disciplines. Much of this work concerns game design, but the games research community has yet to agree on practices and methods for examining game design that are simultaneously rigorously scholarly, flexible enough to accommodate a design-oriented perspective, and sufficiently knowledgeable of computation to engage with the materiality of games.
In this paper, we outline such an approach. We focus on the question of an appropriate method for an academic game design research practice that is grounded in making and play while respecting recoverability and context. We demonstrate what game analysis based on such a method can reveal, drawing on the case of Pippin Barr's It is as if you were doing work, and show how method and analysis in tandem can materialise tacit design knowledge, support balanced subjectivity, and illuminate the often abstract design problem space.

References

[1]
2017. GDC Vault. (2017). https://www.gdcvault.com/
[2]
Espen Aarseth. 2001. Computer Game Studies, Year One. http://gamestudies.org/0101/editorial.html. Game Studies 1, 1 (July 2001).
[3]
Pippin Barr. 2016--2017. 'It is As If You Were Doing Work' Process Diary. (2016--2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/tree/master/process/README.md
[4]
Pippin Barr. 2017. It is As If You Were Doing Work. (2017). https://pippinbarr.github.io/itisasifyouweredoingwork/
[5]
Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is As If You Were Doing Work' commit c0a887d890ffd2a0b2b2dbc34aa1a214f9d3b3e4. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/commit/c0a887d890ffd2a0b2b2dbc34aa1a214f9d3b3e4
[6]
Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is as if you were doing work'data.js file. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/blob/master/js/data.js
[7]
Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is As If You Were Doing Work' GitHub Repository. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork
[8]
Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is as if you were doing work' screenshot of UI with alien text. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/commit/51b5f5d883f146b8d232f706e4cac802b33a6783
[9]
Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is as if you were doing work' screenshot of UI with placeholder text. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/blob/master/process/images/Screen%20Shot%202017-01-05%20at%2012.03.57.png
[10]
Pippin Barr. 2017. Press Kit for 'It Is As If You Were Doing Work'. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/tree/master/press/README.md
[11]
Rob Beschizza. 2017. It Is As If You Were Doing Work is a browser game celebrating Windows 3-era cubicle drudgery. (2017). https://boingboing.net/2017/07/04/it-is-as-if-you-were-doing-wor.html
[12]
John Biggs. 2017. New game simulates the old grind. (2017). https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/06/new-game-simulates-the-old-grind/
[13]
Mark Blythe, Kees Overbeeke, Andrew Monk, and Peter Wright. 2003. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Springer Netherlands.
[14]
Mark Blythe, Jamie Steane, Jenny Roe, and Caroline Oliver. 2015. Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3849--3858.
[15]
Tom Boellstorff, Bonnie Nardi, Celia Pearce, and T. L. Taylor. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press.
[16]
Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Negative Emotion, Positive Experience?: Emotionally Moving Moments in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2996--3006.
[17]
John Bowers. 2012. The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of 'Research Through Design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--77.
[18]
Richard Buchanan. 1985. Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice. Design Issues 2, 1 (1985), 4--22.
[19]
Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 424--433.
[20]
John M. Carroll and John M. Thomas. 1988. FUN. SIGCHI Bull. 19 (January 1988), 21--24. Issue 3.
[21]
Dennis Chao. 2001. Doom As an Interface for Process Management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 152--157.
[22]
Lucas Colusso, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Designing Closeness to Increase Gamers' Performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3020--3024.
[23]
Patricia Ivette Cornelio Martinez, Silvana De Pirro, Chi Thanh Vi, and Sriram Subramanian. 2017. Agency in Mid-air Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2426--2439.
[24]
Nigel Cross. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[25]
Peter Dalsgaard. 2010. Research in and Through Design: An Interaction Design Research Approach. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 200--203.
[26]
Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Reflective Design Documentation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 428--437.
[27]
Heather Desurvire, Martin Caplan, and Jozsef A. Toth. 2004. Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Playability of Games. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1509--1512.
[28]
Sebastian Deterding. 2017. The Pyrrhic Victory of Game Studies. Games and Culture 12, 6 (2017), 521--543.
[29]
Steven P. Dow, Kate Heddleston, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2009. The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165--174.
[30]
Markku Eskelinen. 2001. The Gaming Situation. http://www.gamestudies.org/0101/eskelinen/. Game Studies 1, 1 (July 2001).
[31]
Daniel Fallman. 2007. Why Research-Oriented Design Isn't Design-Oriented Research: On the Tensions Between Design and Research in an Implicit Design Discipline. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20, 3 (01 Oct 2007), 193--200.
[32]
Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Values at Play in Digital Games. The MIT Press.
[33]
Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art.
[34]
Tracy Fullerton. 2008. Game Design Workshop, Second Edition: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games (Gama Network Series) (2 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
[35]
Wei Gai, Chenglei Yang, Yulong Bian, Chia Shen, Xiangxu Meng, Lu Wang, Juan Liu, Mingda Dong, Chengjie Niu, and Cheng Lin. 2017. Supporting Easy Physical-to-Virtual Creation of Mobile VR Maze Games: A New Genre. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5016--5028.
[36]
Bill Gaver. 2002. Designing for Homo Ludens. i3 Magazine (June 2002), 2--5.
[37]
William Gaver. 2011. Making Spaces: How Design Workbooks Work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1551--1560.
[38]
Danny Godin and Mithra Zahedi. 2014. Aspects of Research through Design. In Proceedings of the Design, Research, Society Conference 2014. Umea, Sweden.
[39]
Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The Three Paradigms of HCI. In alt.chi 2007.
[40]
Henriette C M Hoonhout. 2008. Let the Game Tester Do the Talking: Think Aloud and Interviewing to Learn About the Game Experience. In Game Usability: Advancing the Player Experience, Katherine Isbister and Noah Schaffer (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Chapter 4, 65 -- 77.
[41]
Robin Hunicke, Marc Leblanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. In Proceedings of the Challenges in Game AI Workshop, Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[42]
Patrick W. Jordan. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor & Francis, London.
[43]
Mallory Ketcheson, Luke Walker, and T.C. Nicholas Graham. 2016. Thighrim and Calf-Life: A Study of the Conversion of Off-the-Shelf Video Games into Exergames. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2681--2692.
[44]
Rilla Khaled and Gordon Ingram. 2012. Tales from the front lines of a large-scale serious game project. In Proceedings of CHI 2012. ACM Press, 69--78.
[45]
Annakaisa Kultima. 2015. Game Design Research. In Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindTrek '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18--25.
[46]
Youn-Kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, and Josh Tenenberg. 2008. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, Article 7 (July 2008), 27 pages. Issue 2.
[47]
Regan Mandryk, Kori Inkpen, and Tom Calvert. 2006. Using Psychophysiological Techniques to Measure User Experience with Entertainment Technologies. Behaviour and Information Technology (Special Issue on User Experience 25, 2 (2006), 141--158.
[48]
Joe Marshall, Conor Linehan, and Adrian Hazzard. 2016. Designing Brutal Multiplayer Video Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2669--2680.
[49]
Jean McNiff. 2013. Action Research: Principles and Practice. Routledge.
[50]
Florian Mueller and Katherine Isbister. 2014. Movement-based Game Guidelines. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2191--2200.
[51]
Janet Horowitz Murray. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press, New York, NY, USA.
[52]
Nintendo. 2003. WarioWare. WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames!. (2003).
[53]
Donald A. Norman. 1990. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.
[54]
James Pierce. 2014. On the Presentation and Production of Design Research Artifacts in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 735--744.
[55]
Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society 27, 4 (2011), 252--260.
[56]
Tom Regan. 2017. Recreate the thrills of '90s PC admin in this browser game. (2017). https://www.engadget.com/2017/07/06/recreate-the-thrills-of-90s-pc-admin-in-this-browser-game/
[57]
Jesse Schell. 2008. The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses (1 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
[58]
Donald A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
[59]
Ben Shneiderman. 2004. Designing for Fun: How Can We Design User Interfaces to Be More Fun? interactions 11, 5 (Sept. 2004), 48--50.
[60]
Herbert A. Simon. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[61]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.
[62]
T.L. Taylor. 2002. Whose game is this anyway? Negotiating corporate ownership in a virtual world. In Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings. Tampere University Press, 227--242.
[63]
James Vincent. 2017. Relive the Windows 95 glory days with this work simulation game. (July 2017). https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/7/6/15927338/work-simulation-game-windows-95-pippin-barr
[64]
Sebastien Wesolowski. 2017. "It is as if you were doing work", un simulateur de travail pour un monde post-emploi. (2017). https://motherboard.vice.com/fr/article/8xaq4a/it-is-as-if-you-were-doing-work-un-simulateur-de-travail-pour-un-monde-post-emploi
[65]
Raymond Williams. 2003. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. Routledge.
[66]
Jerry Willis. 2007. Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, SAGE PUBLISHING, CA.
[67]
Zhao Zhao, Ali Arya, Anthony Whitehead, Gerry Chan, and S. Ali Etemad. 2017. Keeping Users Engaged Through Feature Updates: A Long-Term Study of Using Wearable-Based Exergames. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1053--1064.
[68]
John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research Through Design As a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Documenting trajectories in design space: a methodology for applied game design research

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      FDG '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games
      August 2018
      503 pages
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 August 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. design methods
      2. design research
      3. game design
      4. game design research
      5. prototyping

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      FDG '18
      FDG '18: Foundations of Digital Games 2018
      August 7 - 10, 2018
      Malmö, Sweden

      Acceptance Rates

      FDG '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 39 of 95 submissions, 41%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 152 of 415 submissions, 37%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)83
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media