skip to main content
10.1145/3535782.3535804acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Distribution of Data Power in Human-Machine Collaboration

Published: 18 July 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Machines are increasingly playing an important role in humans’ daily life. Humans are facing risks brought by various types of agent decisions, which may be out of control, at the time of enjoying excellent and convenient services provided by them. From perspectives of both theory and case study, machines have better accuracy and efficiency in logical tasks than humans, while humans are much more flexible and creative in experiential tasks. Since humans began to consider data resources as objects for study and management, human-machine relationship has sequentially gone through four different stages – adversarial stage, cooperative stage, uncontrollable stage and collaborative stage. This paper discusses issues on data power distribution so as to improve human-machine collaboration.

References

[1]
Peter D. Maclntyre, Lanxi Wang, and Gholam Hassan Khajavy. 2020. Thinking fast and slow about willingness to communicate: A two-systems view. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 6, 3 (November 2020), 443-458. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.834681
[2]
Justin Johnson, Agrim Gupta, and Fei-Fei Li. 2018. Image generation from scene graphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF 31st Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Salt Lake City, UT, 1219-1228. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00133
[3]
Masahiro Mori. 1970. The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 4 (December 1970), 33-35.
[4]
Karl F. MacDorman, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2006. The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies 7, 3 (January 2006), 297-337. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.03mac
[5]
Jun'ichiro Seyama, and Ruth S. Nagauama. 2007. The Uncanny Valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16, 4 (August 2007), 337-351. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.337
[6]
Kurt Gray, and Deniel M. Wegner. 2012. Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125, 1 (October 2012), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.007
[7]
Berkeley J. Dietvorst, Joseph P. Simmons, and Cade Massey. 2015. Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144, 1 (February 2015), 114-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000033
[8]
Noah Castelo, Maarten W. Bos, and Donald R. Lehmann. 2019. Task-dependent algorithm aversion. Journal of Marketing Research 56, 5 (October 2019), 809-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851788
[9]
Qian Wang. 2019. Research on multi-feature stock trend forecast based on LSTM. Master Thesis, School of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology.
[10]
Yue Qi, and Lu Shi. 2020. A decision-support modeling of e-resources procurement based on dynamic programming. Digital Library Forum, 11 (November 2020), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2020.11.004
[11]
Yulong Wang, Feng Pei, Wenru Liu, and 2021. Huma-imitative autonomous driving decision-making algorithm based on switched deep neural networks. China Mechanical Engineering 32, 6 (March 2021), 689-696. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2021.06.008
[12]
Kunru Yan. 2020. Deviation of algorithms of artificial intelligence and its avoidance. Jianghai Academic Journal, 5 (September 2020), 141-146.
[13]
Nick R. Jennings, L. Moreau, D. Nicholson, and 2014. Human-agent collectives. Communications of the ACM 57, 12 (December 2014), 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629559
[14]
Milena Tsvetkova, Taha Yasseri, Eric T. Meyer, and 2017. Understanding human-machine networks: A cross-disciplinary survey. ACM Computing Surveys 50, 1 (April 2017), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3039868
[15]
Jean-Francois Bonnefon, and Iyad Rahwan. 2020. Machine thinking, fast and slow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24, 12 (December 2020), 1019-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.007
[16]
Daniel S. Weld, and Gagan Bansal. 2019. The challenge of crafting intelligible intelligence. Communications of the ACM 62, 6 (June 2019), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282486
[17]
Tim Miller. 2019. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence 267, (February 2019), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007
[18]
Tae Woo Kim, and Adam Duhachek. 2020. Artificial intelligence and persuasion: A construal-level account. Psychological Science 31, 4 (April 2020), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620904985
[19]
Mayada Oudah, Vahan Babushkin, Tennom Chenlinangjia, and 2015. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 10th International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’15) . ACM, Portland, OR, 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696482
[20]
Paul F. Christiano, Jan Leike, Tom B. Brown, and 2017. Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. In Proceedings of the IEEE 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. IEEE, Long Beach, CA.
[21]
Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, Michael Veale, and 2018. 'It's reducing a human being to a percentage': perceptions of justice in algorithmic decisions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18) . ACM, Montreal, CANADA, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173951

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MSIE '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering
April 2022
497 pages
ISBN:9781450395816
DOI:10.1145/3535782
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

MSIE 2022

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 56
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 06 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media