skip to main content
research-article

Digital Information Asset Evaluation: A Case Study in Manufacturing

Published: 25 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The article discusses a model for information value assessment based on the concepts of information capacity, information utility, and information management costs. Notwithstanding that both state-of-the-art researchers and practitioners consider information as a fundamental asset, there is actually no consensus on what are the determinants of information value, particularly with regard to the increasing number of data available through digitalized processes and services. The model is applied to a case study comparing two information management projects for the improvement of core business processes of a global manufacturing company based in Italy.

References

[1]
Ahituv, N. (1980). A systematic approach towards assessing the value of an information system. MIS Quarterly, 4(4), 61--75.
[2]
Ahituv, N. (1989). Assessing the value of information: Problems and approaches. In J. I. DeGross, J. C. Henderson, & B. R. Konsynski (Eds.), International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1989) (pp. 315--325). Boston, Massachusetts.
[3]
Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., Maurino, A., & Viscusi, G. (2011). A capacity and value based model for data architectures adopting integration technologies. In Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2011), Detroit, Michigan, August 4--7, 2011.
[4]
Batini, C., Ceri, S., & Navathe, S. B. (1991). Conceptual database design: An entity-relationship approach. Redwood City, CA, USA: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc.
[5]
Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2006). Data quality: Concepts, methodologies and techniques. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
[6]
Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2016). Data and information quality: Dimensions, principles and techniques. Springer.
[7]
Bauer, C., Korunovska, J., & Spiekermann, S. (2012). On the value of information--What Facebook users are willing to pay. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2012), Barcelona, Spain, June 11--13, 2012.
[8]
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013a). Digital business strategy: Toward a extgeneration of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471--482. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/misq/downloads/download/editorial/581/
[9]
Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013b). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471--482.
[10]
Boisot, M. (1995). Information space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions, and culture. London; New York: Routledge.
[11]
Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
[12]
Boisot, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Han, K. S. (2007). Explorations in information space knowledge, actors, and firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[13]
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology: Review and assessment. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67--77.
[14]
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Digital Frontier Press.
[15]
Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, June(1), 12.
[16]
da Cruz, M. A. L., & dos Santos, H. M. D. (2016). The information value: Perception of the problem. In Á. Rocha, A. M. Correia, H. Adeli, L. P. Reis, & M. Mendonça Teixeira (Eds.), New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 503--509). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[17]
Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (2003). Information technology and economic performance?: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1--28.
[18]
Francalanci, C., & Morabito, V. (2008). IS integration and business performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 297--312. Retrieved from
[19]
Gilboa, I., & Lehrer, E. (1991). The value of information -- An axiomatic approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 443--459.
[20]
Glazer, R. (1993). Measuring the value of information: The information-intensive organization. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 99--110.
[21]
Kallinikos, J. (2006). The consequences of information - Institutional implications of technological change. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
[22]
Kettinger, W. J., Grover, V., Guha, S., & Segars, A. H. (1994). Strategic information-systems revisited - A study in sustainability and performance. MISQ Quarterly, 18(1), 31--58.
[23]
Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23--39.
[24]
Lee, Y. W., Pipino, L. L., Funk, J. D., & Wang, R. Y. (2009). Journey to data quality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[25]
Markus, M. L., Tanis, C., & van Fenema, P. C. (2000). Enterprise resource planning: Multisite ERP implementations. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 42--46.
[26]
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MISQ, 28(2), 283--322.
[27]
Moody, D., & Walsh, P. (1999). Measuring the value of Information: An asset valuation approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS1999), Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark, June 23--25, 1999.
[28]
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
[29]
Quetti, C., Pigni, F., & Clerici, A. (2012). Factors affecting RFId adoption in a vertical supply chain: The case of the silk industry in Italy. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 23(4), 315--331.
[30]
Raban, D. R., & Mazor, M. (2013). The willingness to pay for information in digital marketplaces. In A. Kobyli'ski & A. Sobczak (Eds.), Perspectives in business informatics research, 12th International Conference, BIR 2013, Warsaw, Poland, September 23--25, 2013. Proceedings (pp. 267--277). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[31]
Remenyi, D., Money, A., Sherwood-Smith, M., & Zahir, I. (2000). The effective measurement and management of IT costs and benefits (2nd ed.). Butterworth Heinemann.
[32]
Sajko, M., Rabuzin, K., Bača, M. (2006). How to calculate information value for effective security risk assessment. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 30(2), 263--278.
[33]
Simpson, C. W., & Prusak, L. (1995). Troubles with information overload-Moving from quantity to quality in information provision. International Journal of Information Management, 15(6), 413--425.
[34]
Skyrme, D. (1994). Ten ways to add value to your business. Managing Information, 1(3), 20--25.
[35]
Spiekermann, S., & Korunovska, J. (2017). Towards a value theory for personal data. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 62--84.
[36]
Stewart, T. A., Brown, J. S., Hagel, J., McFarlan, F. W., Nolan, R. L., Strassmann, P. A., & Carr, N. G. (2003). Does IT Matter? An HBR Debate, Letters to the Editor, Harvard Business Review, June 2003, 1--17.
[37]
Tallon, B. P. P., & Scannell, R. (2007). Information life cycle. Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 65--69.
[38]
The Economist. (2010). Data, data everywhere. Special Report: Managing Information.
[39]
Viscusi, G., & Batini, C. (2014). Digital Information Asset Evaluation: Characteristics and Dimensions. In L. Caporarello, B. Di Martino, & M. Martinez (Eds.), Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts SE - 9 (Vol. 7, pp. 77--86). Springer International Publishing.
[40]
Yoo, Y. (2013). The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 227--236.
[41]
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary-The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724--735.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 49, Issue 3
August 2018
115 pages
ISSN:0095-0033
EISSN:1532-0936
DOI:10.1145/3242734
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 July 2018
Published in SIGMIS Volume 49, Issue 3

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. digital information asset
  2. information capacity
  3. information management
  4. information quality
  5. information utility
  6. information value

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media