skip to main content
10.1145/3399715.3399861acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing usable interfaces for the Industry 4.0

Published: 02 October 2020 Publication History

Abstract

In Industry 4.0, Human Machine Interfaces are largely used in order to increase the performances of production processes at the same time reducing the number of emergencies and accidents. In manufacturing, the most typical system used to monitor the production is the Andon. It is a graphical system exploited in plants to notify operators who deal with management, maintenance and production performance of the presence of a problem. Of course, the usability of such interfaces is essential to allow an operator to identify and react more effectively to potentially critical situations. Improving the usability of such interfaces is a big challenge due to the increasing complexity of the data that must be processed and understood quickly by operators. In this paper, we present a set of guidelines to help professional developers to design usable interfaces for monitoring industrial production in manufacturing. Such guidelines are based on usability principles and formalized by reviewing existing industrial interfaces. Using a realistic case study prepared with manufacturing experts, we propose an Andon interface that we developed to test the efficacy of these guidelines on a last generation touch-wall device.

References

[1]
Bellucci, A., Romano, M., Aedo, I., & Díaz, P. (2016). Software support for multitouch interaction: the end-user programming perspective. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 15(1), 78--86.
[2]
Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., & Lewis, C. (2002, April). Cognitive walkthrough for the web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 463--470).
[3]
Brandolese A., Pozzetti A., Sianesi A., "Gestione della Produzione Industriale - principi, metodologie applicazioni e misure di prestazione, Hoepli, 2004.
[4]
Cannan, J., Hu, H., 2011. Human-Machine Interaction (HMI): A Survey. University of Essex
[5]
CRUZ-BENITO, Juan; GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco J.; THERÓN, Roberto. Analyzing the software architectures supporting HCI/HMI processes through a systematic review of the literature. Telematics and Informatics, 2019, 38: 118--132.
[6]
Di Chiara, G., Paolino, L., Romano, M., Sebillo, M., Tortora, G., Vitiello, G., & Ginige, A. (2011, September). The framy user interface for visually-impaired users. In 2011 Sixth International Conference on Digital Information Management (pp. 36--41). IEEE.
[7]
Dix, A. (2017). Human-computer interaction, foundations and new paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 42, 122--134.
[8]
Errington, J., Reising, D. V. C., Bullemer, P., DeMaere, T., Coppard, D., Doe, K., & Bloom, C. (2005, September). Establishing human performance improvements and economic benefit for a human-centered operator interface: An industrial evaluation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 49, No. 23, pp. 2036--2040). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
[9]
Ginige, A., Romano, M., Sebillo, M., Vitiello, G., & Di Giovanni, P. (2012, May). Spatial data and mobile applications: general solutions for interface design. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 189--196).
[10]
Groover M. P., "Automation, Production Systems, and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, fourth ed., Pearson 2016.
[11]
Hewett, T.T., Baecker, R., Card, S., Carey, T., Gasen, J., Mantei, M., ... Verplank, W., 1992. ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction (0897914740). New York, NY, USA
[12]
Hoc, J.-M., 2000. From human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation. Ergonomics 43 (7), 833--843.
[13]
HOLLIFIELD, Bill. A High Performance HMI: Better Graphics for Operations Effectiveness. In: 2012 Water/Wastewater and Automation Controls Symposium. 2012.
[14]
Hollifield, B. (2013). High Performance HMI--Proof Testing in Real-World Trials. In 2013 ISA Water/Wastewater and Automatic Controls Symposium.
[15]
Hansen RC. Overall equipment effectiveness: a powerful production/maintenance tool for increased profits. New York: Industrial Press, 2002.
[16]
Hart, S. G. (2006, October). NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 904--908). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
[17]
He, F., Shen, K., Lu, L., & Tong, Y. (2018). Model for improvement of overall equipment effectiveness of beerfilling lines. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(8), 1687814018789247.
[18]
Hedman, R., Subramaniyan, M., & Almström, P. (2016). Analysis of critical factors for automatic measurement of OEE. Procedia Cirp, 57, 128--133.
[19]
Humiras, H. P., Erwin, W., & Niko, A. (2018). Analysis of overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) with total productive maintenance method on jig cutting: a case study in manufacturing industry. J Sci Eng Res, 5(7), 397--406.
[20]
Liker, Jeffrey (2004) "The Toyota Way New York: McGraw Hill ISBN 0-07-139231-9
[21]
Liff, S., and P. A. Posey. 2004. Seeing Is Believing: How the New Art of Visual Management Can Boost Performance Throughout Your Organization. New York: AMACOM
[22]
Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1--10.
[23]
Monga R., Khurana V., "Facility Layout Planning: a Review, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 3, March 2015.)
[24]
Muthiah, K. M. N., & Huang, S. H. (2007). Overall throughput effectiveness (OTE) metric for factory-level performance monitoring and bottleneck detection. International Journal of Production Research, 45(20), 4753--4769.
[25]
Nachiappan, R. M., & Anantharaman, N. (2006). Evaluation of overall line effectiveness (OLE) in a continuous product line manufacturing system. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
[26]
Nayak, E. A., Vijaya Kumar, M., Naidu, G. S., & Shankar, V. (2013). Evaluation of OEE in a continuous process industry on an insulation line in a cable manufacturing unit. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(5).
[27]
Nielsen, J. (2005). Ten usability heuristics.
[28]
Oechsner, R., Pfeffer, M., Pfitzner, L., Binder, H., Müller, E., & Vonderstrass, T. (2002). From overall equipment efficiency (OEE) to overall Fab effectiveness (OFE). Materials science in semiconductor processing, 5(4--5), 333--339.
[29]
Okpala, C. Chikwendu, Okechukwu, "Plant Layouts' Analysis and Design, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology, Vol. VII/Issue, 2016.
[30]
Paolino, L., Romano, M., Tortora, G., & Vitiello, G. (2013, July). Spatial data visualization on mobile interface-A usability study. In 2013 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) (pp. 959--963). IEEE.
[31]
Pinedo M.L., "Scheduling, Theory, Algorithms, and Systems, fifth ed. Springer 2016.
[32]
WÄCHTER, Michael; Holger; BULLINGER, Angelika C. Towards an engineering process to design usable tangible human-machine interfaces. In: Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. Springer, Cham, 2018. p. 136--147.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Designing usable interfaces for the Industry 4.0

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AVI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
    September 2020
    613 pages
    ISBN:9781450375351
    DOI:10.1145/3399715
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 02 October 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Andon
    2. HMI
    3. Multitouch display
    4. OEE

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AVI '20
    AVI '20: International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
    September 28 - October 2, 2020
    Salerno, Italy

    Acceptance Rates

    AVI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 123 submissions, 29%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 128 of 490 submissions, 26%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media