skip to main content
10.1145/2971485.2987670acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Designing eHealth Services for Patients and Relatives: Critical Incidents and Lessons to Learn

Published: 23 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The number of eHealth services for patients and relatives is rapidly increasing as many countries are launching such services as a means to manage an ageing population, to increase efficiency in healthcare, and to empower patients. However, design and deployment of eHealth services for patients is challenging due to the complex setting and the multitude of affected stakeholders, which in turn make the task of eliciting and managing the needs and requirements equally challenging. Hence, this workshop1 aims to make use of critical incident analysis as a method for collecting and jointly reflecting on practices, assumptions, and experiences in relation to the design, deployment, and use of eHealth services for patients and relatives. The goal of the workshop is to engage in joint reflection, and to find potential ways forward in relation to critical incidents as well as supporting the shaping and reshaping of eHealth design and development. This full day workshop invites researchers and practitioners to apply/provide their critical reflection in order to derive changed practices and theories about practice. We also especially invite the patients' perspective as this is crucial to achieve successful eHealth services. This workshop provides a venue for challenging the process of eHealth service design and development and is built around a concept of active participation, where the workshop participants will analyse and discuss the critical incidents together.

References

[1]
de Lusignan, S., Mold, F., Sheikh, A., Majeed, A., Wyatt, J. C., Quinn, T., Cavill, M., Gronlund, T. A., Franco, C., Chauhan, U., Blakey, H., Kataria, N., Barker, F., Ellis, B., Koczan, P., Arvanitis, T. N., McCarthy, M., Jones, S., and Rafi, I. Patients' online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review. BMJ Open 4, 9 (Dec. 2013), e006021--e006021.
[2]
Doherty, N. F., Ashurst, C., and Peppard, J. Factors affecting the successful realisation of benefits from systems development projects: findings from three case studies. Journal of Information Technology 27, 1 (Mar. 2012), 1--16.
[3]
Dunn, W. R., and Hamilton, D. D. The Critical Incident Technique--a brief guide. Medical Teacher 8, 3 (1986), 207--215.
[4]
Erlingsdottir, G., and Lindholm, C. When patient empowerment encounters professional autonomy: The conflict and negotiation process of inscribing an eHealth service. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 19, 2 (2014), 7--28.
[5]
Fook, J., and Gardner, F. Practising Critical Reflection: A Resource Handbook. A Handbook. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), Sept. 2007.
[6]
Grünloh, C., Cajander, Å., and Myreteg, G. "The Record is our Work Tool!" - Physicians' Framing of a Patient Portal in Sweden. J Med Internet Res (Forthcoming).
[7]
Jarke, M., Loucopoulos, P., Lyytinen, K., Mylopoulos, J., and Robinson, W. The brave new world of design requirements. Information Systems 36, 7 (Nov. 2011), 992--1008.
[8]
Jilka, R. S., Callahan, R., Sevdalis, N., Mayer, K. E., and Darzi, A. "Nothing About Me Without Me": An Interpretative Review of Patient Accessible Electronic Health Records. J Med Internet Res 17, 6 (Jun 2015), e161.
[9]
Lapointe, L., Mignerat, M., and Vedel, I. The it productivity paradox in health: A stakeholder's perspective. International journal of medical informatics 80, 2 (2011), 102--115.
[10]
Mainardes, E. W., Alves, H., and Raposo, M. A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision (Apr. 2013).
[11]
Myers, M. D. Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems. Information Systems Journal 5, 1 (1995), 51--70.
[12]
Nazi, K. M. The personal health record paradox: Health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings. Journal of medical Internet research 15, 4 (2013), e70.
[13]
Scandurra, I., Jansson, A., Forsberg-Fransson, M.-L., and Ålander, T. Is 'Patient's Online Access to Health Records' a Good Reform? -- Opinions from Swedish healthcare professionals differ. Procedia Computer Science 64 (2015), 964--968.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
October 2016
1045 pages
ISBN:9781450347631
DOI:10.1145/2971485
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 October 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Design
  2. critical incidents
  3. development
  4. eHealth
  5. patients
  6. reflective practice
  7. relatives
  8. stakeholders

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

NordiCHI '16

Acceptance Rates

NordiCHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 231 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media