skip to main content
10.1145/3405755.3406133acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Decision Trees as Sociotechnical Objects in Chatbot Design

Published: 22 July 2020 Publication History

Abstract

Designers of dialogue-driven systems and 'conversational' agents like chatbots face huge complexities, both in the rich meanings of language and its sophisticated sequential organisation. To this end designers are starting to work out what it means to treat 'conversation' as a design material. But the elephant in the room is that for the most part, the key way of managing the complexities of chatbot design is the decision tree, or some variant of this. Yet decision trees have received little scrutiny as sociotechnical objects which both provide purchase for---but also simultaneously significantly restrict---design practice. CUI research needs to ramp up its concern for various assumptions built into chatbot design processes, and the various stakeholders which may be at play.

References

[1]
2017. Introducing Dialogflow, the new name for API.AI. Retrieved Mar 5, 2020 from https://blog.dialogflow.com/post/apiai-new-name-dialogflow-new-features/.
[2]
Sameera A Abdul-Kader and JC Woods. 2015. Survey on chatbot design techniques in speech conversation systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 6, 7 (2015).
[3]
Amazon. [n.d.]. Design Process. Retrieved Sept 9, 2019 from https://developer.amazon.com/fr/designing-for-voice/design-process.
[4]
Jack Cahn. 2017. CHATBOT: Architecture, design, & development. University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer and Information Science (2017).
[5]
Teresa Castle-Green, Stuart Reeves, Joel E Fischer, and Boriana Koleva. 2019. Designing with Data: A Case Study. In Presented at the CHI'19 Workshop: New Directions for the IoT: Automate, Share, Build, and Care, May 2019.
[6]
Nigel Cross. 1999. Natural intelligence in design. Design studies 20, 1 (1999), 25--39.
[7]
Elizabeth Goodman. 2013. Delivering design: Performance and materiality in professional interaction design. Ph.D. Dissertation. UC Berkeley.
[8]
Google. [n.d.]. Write sample dialogs. Retrieved August 27, 2019 from https://designguidelines.withgoogle.com/conversation/conversation-design-process/write-sample-dialogs.html.
[9]
Jonathan Grudin and Richard Jacques. 2019. Chatbots, humbots, and the quest for artificial general intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--11.
[10]
Patrik Jonell, Per Fallgren, Fethiye Irmak Doğan, José Lopes, Ulme Wennberg, and Gabriel Skantze. 2019. Crowdsourcing a self-evolving dialog graph. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces. 1--8.
[11]
Rafal Kocielnik, Gary Hsieh, and Daniel Avrahami. 2018. Helping Users Reflect on Their Own Health-Related Behaviors. In Studies in Conversational UX Design. Springer, 85--115.
[12]
Jeff Kramer. 2007. Is abstraction the key to computing? Commun. ACM 50, 4 (2007), 36--42.
[13]
Ilia Kulikov, Alexander Miller, Kyunghyun Cho, and Jason Weston. 2019. Importance of Search and Evaluation Strategies in Neural Dialogue Modeling. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation. 76--87.
[14]
Bryan Lawson. 1980. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified (4th ed.). Butterworth Architecture, Butterworths.
[15]
Wei-Yin Loh. 2014. Fifty years of classification and regression trees. International Statistical Review 82, 3 (2014), 329--348.
[16]
John F Magee. 1964. Decision trees for decision making. Harvard Business Review.
[17]
James N Morgan and John A Sonquist. 1963. Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal. Journal of the American statistical association 58, 302 (1963), 415--434.
[18]
Iulia Nica, Oliver A Tazl, and Franz Wotawa. 2018. Chatbot-based Tourist Recommendations Using Model-based Reasoning. In 20 th International Configuration Workshop. 25.
[19]
Donald A Schön. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. "Temple Smith London".
[20]
Amir Shevat. 2017. Designing bots: Creating conversational experiences. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
[21]
Irene Solaiman, Miles Brundage, Jack Clark, Amanda Askell, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Jeff Wu, Alec Radford, and Jasmine Wang. 2019. Release strategies and the social impacts of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09203 (2019).

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Decision Trees as Sociotechnical Objects in Chatbot Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CUI '20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces
    July 2020
    271 pages
    ISBN:9781450375443
    DOI:10.1145/3405755
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. conversation design
    2. corpus-based chatbots
    3. decision trees
    4. rule-based chatbots

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CUI '20

    Acceptance Rates

    CUI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate 13 of 39 submissions, 33%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 34 of 100 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 31 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media