skip to main content
10.1145/3177102.3177109acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshotmobileConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Characterizing the Reconfiguration Latency of Image Sensor Resolution on Android Devices

Published: 12 February 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Advances in vision processing have ignited a proliferation of mobile vision applications, including augmented reality. However, limited by the inability to rapidly reconfigure sensor operation for performance-efficiency tradeoffs, high power consumption causes vision applications to drain the device's battery. To explore the potential impact of enabling rapid reconfiguration, we use a case study around marker-based pose estimation to understand the relationship between image frame resolution, task accuracy, and energy efficiency. Our case study motivates that to balance energy efficiency and task accuracy, the application needs to dynamically and frequently reconfigure sensor resolution.
To explore the latency bottlenecks to sensor resolution reconfiguration, we define and profile the end-to-end reconfiguration latency and frame-to-frame latency of changing capture resolution on a Google LG Nexus 5X device. We identify three major sources of sensor resolution reconfiguration latency in current Android systems: (i) sequential configuration patterns, (ii) expensive system calls, and (iii) imaging pipeline delay. Based on our intuitions, we propose a redesign of the Android camera system to mitigate the sources of latency. Enabling smooth transitions between sensor configurations will unlock new classes of adaptive-resolution vision applications.

References

[1]
Andrew Adams, Eino-Ville Talvala, Sung Hee Park, David E. Jacobs, Boris Ajdin, Natasha Gelfand, Jennifer Dolson, Daniel Vaquero, Jongmin Baek, Marius Tico, Hendrik P. A. Lensch, Wojciech Matusik, Kari Pulli, Mark Horowitz, and Marc Levoy 2010. The Frankencamera: An Experimental Platform for Computational Photography Proceedings of the 37th International Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques.
[2]
Brandon Amos, Bartosz Ludwiczuk, and Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2016. OpenFace: A general-purpose face recognition library with mobile applications. Technical Report. Carnegie Mellon University-CS-16--118, Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science.
[3]
Mark Buckler, Suren Jayasuriya, and Adrian Sampson. 2017. Reconfiguring the Imaging Pipeline for Computer Vision. CoRR (2017).
[4]
Tiffany Yu-Han Chen, Lenin S. Ravindranath, Shuo Deng, Paramvir Victor Bahl, and Hari Balakrishnan 2015. Glimpse: Continuous, Real-Time Object Recognition on Mobile Devices Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems.
[5]
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation. 2017. IMX377CQT ProductSummary v1.5. (2017).
[6]
KHRONOS Group. 2013. Camera BOF. (2013). https://www.khronos.org/assets/uploads/developers/library/2013-siggraph-camera-bof/Camera-BOF_SIGGRAPH-2013.pdf
[7]
Tomas Hruby, Teodor Crivat, Herbert Bos, and Andrew S. Tanenbaum 2014. On Sockets and System Calls Minimizing Context Switches for the Socket API Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Timely Results in Operating Systems.
[8]
Google Inc. 2017. Android Developers: CaptureResult. (2017). https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/camera2/CaptureResult.html
[9]
Seungwoo Kang, Jinwon Lee, Hyukjae Jang, Hyonik Lee, Youngki Lee, Souneil Park, Taiwoo Park, and Junehwa Song. 2008. SeeMon: Scalable and Energy-efficient Context Monitoring Framework for Sensor-rich Mobile Environments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services.
[10]
L. Li, J. Wang, X. Wang, H. Ye, and Z. Hu 2017. SceneMan: Bridging mobile apps with system energy manager via scenario notification Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design.
[11]
Robert LiKamWa, Yunhui Hou, Julian Gao, Mia Polansky, and Lin Zhong 2016. RedEye: Analog ConvNet Image Sensor Architecture for Continuous Mobile Vision Proceedings of the 43rd International Symposium on Computer Architecture.
[12]
Robert LiKamWa, Bodhi Priyantha, Matthai Philipose, Lin Zhong, and Paramvir Bahl 2013. Energy Characterization and Optimization of Image Sensing Toward Continuous Mobile Vision Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services.
[13]
Mahadev Satyanarayanan. 2015. A Brief History of Cloud Offload: A Personal Journey from Odyssey Through Cyber Foraging to Cloudlets. GetMobile: Mobile Comp. and Comm. Vol. 18 (2015).
[14]
Livio Soares and Michael Stumm 2010. FlexSC: Flexible System Call Scheduling with Exception-less System Calls Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation.
[15]
Open Source Computer Vision. 2016. Real Time pose estimation of a textured object. (2016). http://docs.opencv.org/3.2.0/dc/d2c/tutorial_real_time_pose.html
[16]
Yin Yan, Shaun Cosgrove, Varun Anand, Amit Kulkarni, Sree Harsha Konduri, Steven Y. Ko, and Lukasz Ziarek 2014. Real-time Android with RTDroid. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing the Reconfiguration Latency of Image Sensor Resolution on Android Devices

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    HotMobile '18: Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications
    February 2018
    130 pages
    ISBN:9781450356305
    DOI:10.1145/3177102
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 February 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. camera system
    2. image sensor
    3. mobile devices
    4. operating system optimization
    5. reconfiguration

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    HotMobile '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    HotMobile '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 19 of 65 submissions, 29%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 96 of 345 submissions, 28%

    Upcoming Conference

    HOTMOBILE '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)78
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
    Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    EPUB

    View this article in ePub.

    ePub

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media