skip to main content
10.1145/1839594.1839597acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing research in computing education: a preliminary analysis of the literature

Published: 09 August 2010 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary analysis of research papers in computing education. While previous analysis has explored what research is being done in computing education, this project explores how that research is being done. We present our classification system, then the results of applying it to the papers from all five years of ICER. We find that this subset of computing education research has more in common with research in information systems than with that in computer science or software engineering; and that the papers published at ICER generally appear to conform to the specified ICER requirements.

References

[1]
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., and Wortham, D., Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research, Review of Educational Research, vol. 70, pp. 181--214, 2000.
[2]
Bandura, A., Self-efficacy, in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. vol. 4, V. S. Ramachaudran, Ed. NY: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71--81.
[3]
Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., and Sinha, D., Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures, Canadian Journal of Statistics, vol. 27, pp. 3--23, 1999.
[4]
Bennedsen, J. and Caspersen, M. E., Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning computing science, in 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Sydney, Australia, 2008, pp. 15--25.
[5]
Bertalanffy, L. V., The History and Status of General Systems Theory, The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 15 pp. 407--426, 1972.
[6]
Biggs, J. B., Teaching for quality learning at university. what the student does. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2003.
[7]
Bloom, B. S., Mesia, B. B., and Krathwohl, D. R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (two vols: The Affective Domain & The Cognitive Domain) Addison-Wesley, 1956.
[8]
Bond, T. G., Piaget and the Pendulum, Science and Education, vol. 13, pp. 389--399, 2004.
[9]
Chinn, D. and VanDeGrift, T., Gender and Diversity in Hiring Software Professionals: What Do Students Say?, in 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Sydney, Australia, 2008, pp. 39--50.
[10]
Collins, A. M., Brown, J. S., and Holum, A., Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible, American Educator, vol. 15, pp. 6--11, 38--46, 1991.
[11]
Davies, M. and Fleiss, J. L., Measuring agreement for multinomial data., Biometrics, vol. 38, pp. 1047--1051, 1982.
[12]
Denny, P., Hamer, J., and Luxton-Reilly, A., PeerWise: Students Sharing their Multiple Choice Questions, in 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Sydney, Australia, 2008, pp. 51--58.
[13]
Fincher, S. and Petre, M., Computer Science Education Research, Netherlands: Taylor & Francis 2004, p. 239.
[14]
Glass, R. L., Ramesh, V., and Vessey, I., An analysis of research in computing disciplines, Communications of the ACM, vol. 47, pp. 89--94, 2004.
[15]
Glass, R. L., Vessey, I., and Ramesh, V., Research in software engineering: An analysis of the literature, Information and Software Technology, vol. 44, pp. 491--506, 2002.
[16]
Joy, M., Sinclair, J., Sun, S., Sitthiworachart, J., and López-González, J., Categorising computer science education research, Education and Information Technologies, vol. 14, pp. 105--126, 2009.
[17]
Lave, J. and Wenger, E., Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[18]
Marshall, S. P., Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
[19]
Meyer, J. H. and Land, R., Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning, Higher Education, vol. 49, pp. 373--388, 2005.
[20]
Morrison, J. and George, J. F., Exploring the software engineering component in MIS research, Communications of the ACM, vol. 38, pp. 80--91, 1995.
[21]
Moström, J. E., Boustedt, J., Eckerdal, A., McCartney, R., Sanders, K., Thomas, L., and Zander, C., Concrete examples of abstraction as manifested in students' transformative experiences, in 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Sydney, Australia, 2008, pp. 125--136.
[22]
Paas, F., Renkl, A., and Sweller., J., Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments, Educational Psychologist, vol. 38, pp. 1--4, 2003.
[23]
Pears, A., Seidman, S., Eney, C., Kinnunen, P., and Malmi, L., Constructing a core literature for computing education research, SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 37, pp. 152--161, 2005.
[24]
Pears, A., Seidman, S., Malmi, L., Mannila, L., Adams, E., Bennedsen, J., Devlin, M., and Paterson, J., A survey of literature on the teaching of introductory programming, SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 39, pp. 204--223, 2007.
[25]
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W., A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire, University of Michigan, technical report 91-b-0041991.
[26]
Ramesh, V., Glass, R. L., and Vessey, I., Research in computer science: An empirical study, The Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 70, pp. 165--176, 2004.
[27]
Randolph, J., Multidisciplinary methods in educational technology research and development: Published by HAMK Press/Justus Randolph, 2008.
[28]
Randolph, J., Bednarik, R., and Myller, N., A methodological review of the articles published in the proceedings of Koli Calling 2001-2004, in 5th Baltic Sea Conference on Computer Science Education, 2005, pp. 103--109.
[29]
Randolph, J. J., Findings from "A Methodological Review of the Computer Science Education Research: 2000-2005", in SIGCSE Bulletin, 2007, pp. 130--130.
[30]
Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., and Dornheim, L., Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence, 1998.
[31]
Schwartzman, L., On the nature of student defensiveness: theory and feedback from a software design course, in 5th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 2009, pp. 81--91.
[32]
Sheard, J., Simon, Hamilton, M., and Lönnberg, J., Analysis of research into the teaching and learning of programming, in 5th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, 2009, pp. 93--104.
[33]
Simon, A classification of recent Australasian computing education publications, Computer Science Education, vol. 17, pp. 155--170, 2007.
[34]
Simon, Koli Calling comes of age: An analysis, in 7th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research, 2008, pp. 119--126.
[35]
Simon, Carbone, A., de Raadt, M., Lister, R., Hamilton, M., and Sheard, J., Classifying computing education papers: Process and results, in 4th International Workshop on Computing Education Research, Sydney, Australia, 2008, pp. 161--172.
[36]
Simon, Sheard, J., Carbone, A., de Raadt, M., Hamilton, M., Lister, R., and Thompson, E., Eight years of computing education papers at NACCQ, in 21st Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, 2008, pp. 101--107.
[37]
Suddaby, R., From the editors: What grounded theory is not, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 4, pp. 633--642, 2006.
[38]
Valentine, D. W., CS educational research: A meta-analysis of SIGCSE technical symposium proceedings, in 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2004, pp. 255--259.
[39]
Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., and Glass, R. L., Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 19, pp. 129--174, 2002.
[40]
Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., and Glass, R. L., A unified classification system for research in the computing disciplines, Information and Software Technology, vol. 47, pp. 245--255, 2005.
[41]
Wiersma, W., Research Methods in Education: An Introduction, 8th ed. MassachuseTT: Allyn and Bacon, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICER '10: Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research
August 2010
124 pages
ISBN:9781450302579
DOI:10.1145/1839594
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 August 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. classifying publications
  2. computing education
  3. research methods

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICER '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

ICER 2025
ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
August 3 - 6, 2025
Charlottesville , VA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 27 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media