skip to main content
10.1145/3635636.3656206acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Body and Code: A Distributed Cognition Exploration Into Dance and Computing Learning

Published: 23 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Representational forms are central to how we explore, communicate, and learn. Yet, they can be challenging to engage with as designers because they vary across disciplines, cultures, and communities. In this paper, we describe our analysis of a dance and computing learning environment through the lens of distributed cognition to examine how representations and processing of information across people and systems impacted the learning process. We analyzed video and audio data from three workshops of dance and STEM instructors learning about, creating with, and co-designing computing activities with danceON—a creative computing platform that supports coding animations over dance videos. We identified the ways that the instructors used their bodies as a shared point of negotiation while co-creating dance artifacts, the participatory role of danceON within the sensemaking process, the ways that the instructors interpreted and translated representations across physical and digital spaces, and the impact of the instructors’ collaborative interactions to their sensemaking.

References

[1]
Wilver Auccahuasi, Sandra Meza, Alfonso Fuentes, Grisi Bernardo, Lucas Herrera, Christian Ovalle, Hernando Martin Campos Martínez, Karin Rojas, Miryam Inciso-Rojas, and Aly Auccahuasi. 2022. Method to Increase Virtual Interactivity, through Virtual Reality Technology, Aplied to Engieering Students. In 2022 Algorithms, Computing and Mathematics Conference (ACM). 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACM57404.2022.00021
[2]
[2] John Baldessari. 2004. https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/13308
[3]
Paulo Blikstein. 2013. Gears of our childhood: constructionist toolkits, robotics, and physical computing, past and future. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (New York, New York, USA) (IDC ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2485760.2485786
[4]
Francisco Enrique Vicente Castro, Kayla DesPortes, William Payne, Yoav Bergner, and Kathleen McDermott. 2022. AI + Dance: Co-Designing Culturally Sustaining Curricular Resources for AI and Ethics Education Through Artistic Computing. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 2(ICER ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 26–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501709.3544275
[5]
Dionne N Champion. 2018. The STEAM dance makerspace: A context for integration: An investigation of learning at the intersections of STEM, art, making and embodiment. Ph. D. Dissertation. Northwestern University.
[6]
Shaundra B. Daily, Alison E. Leonard, Sophie Jörg, Sabarish Babu, and Kara Gundersen. 2014. Dancing Alice: Exploring Embodied Pedagogical Strategies for Learning Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education(SIGCSE ’14). ACM, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538917
[7]
Elise Deitrick, R. Benjamin Shapiro, Matthew P. Ahrens, Rebecca Fiebrink, Paul D. Lehrman, and Saad Farooq. 2015. Using Distributed Cognition Theory to Analyze Collaborative Computer Science Learning. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (Omaha, Nebraska, USA) (ICER ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787715
[8]
Kayla DesPortes, Kathleen McDermott, Yoav Bergner, Francisco Enrique Vicente Castro, Sauda Musharrat, and Aakruit Lunia. 2024. DanceBits ‘It tells you to see us’: Supporting Dance Practices with an Educational Computing Kit. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3623509.3633350
[9]
Kayla DesPortes, Kathleen McDermott, Yoav Bergner, and William Payne. 2022. “Go [ing] Hard... as a Woman of Color”: A Case Study Examining Identity Work within a Performative Dance and Computing Learning Environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 22, 4 (2022), 1–29.
[10]
Andrea A. diSessa. 2004. Metarepresentation: Native Competence and Targets for Instruction. Cognition and Instruction 22, 3 (2004), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
[11]
Fiona Fairlie. 2024. Encouraging the Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Structured Dance Activities (Discussion Paper). In Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli, Finland) (Koli Calling ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 40, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3631802.3631811
[12]
Breeann Flesch, Camila Gabaldón, Matthew Nabity, and Darryl Thomas. 2021. Choreographing Increased Understanding and Positive Attitudes towards Coding by Integrating Dance.International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools 4, 3 (2021), n3.
[13]
János Fügedi. 2003. Movement Cognition and Dance Notation. Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44, 3-4 (2003), 393 – 410. https://doi.org/10.1556/smus.44.2003.3-4.5
[14]
Berto Gonzalez, Erin Carroll, and Celine Latulipe. 2012. Dance-Inspired Technology, Technology-Inspired Dance. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design (Copenhagen, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399078
[15]
Google. 2023. Teachable Machine. https://teachablemachine.withgoogle.com/ Last accessed 21 November 2023.
[16]
Judith A. Gray. 1989. Dance Technology. Current Applications and Future Trends. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance Publications, PO Box 704, 9 Jay Gould Court, Waldorf, MD 20604.
[17]
Christine A Halverson. 2002. Activity theory and distributed cognition: Or what does CSCW need to DO with theories?Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 11 (2002), 243–267.
[18]
Erica Rosenfeld Halverson. 2013. Digital art making as a representational process. Journal of the Learning Sciences 22, 1 (2013), 121–162.
[19]
Donna Haraway. 1985. A Cyborg manifesto. University of Minnesota, Humanities Research Center.
[20]
James Hollan, Edwin Hutchins, and David Kirsh. 2000. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 7, 2 (2000), 174–196.
[21]
Edwin Hutchins. 1995. How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive science 19, 3 (1995), 265–288.
[22]
Edwin Hutchins and Tove Klausen. 1996. Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. Cognition and communication at work (1996), 15–34.
[23]
Gayithri Jayathirtha and Francisco Enrique Vicente Castro. 2023. Disaggregating Asian Identities through Case Studies of High School Students in Electronic Textiles Classrooms. Sustainability 15, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015128
[24]
Michael J Johnson, Francisco Enrique Vicente Castro, Betsy DiSalvo, and Kayla DesPortes. 2023. Chronicles of Exploration: Examining the Materiality of Computational Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 (Chicago, IL, USA) (ICER ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568813.3600132
[25]
Richard Joiner, Emily Mizen, Bethany Pinnell, Laraib Siddique, Abigail Bradley, and Skye Trevalyen. 2023. The effect of different types of TikTok dance challenge videos on young women’s body satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior 147 (2023), 107856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107856
[26]
Susan R Koff. 2000. Toward a definition of dance education. Childhood Education 77, 1 (2000), 27–32.
[27]
Rudolf Laban and F. C. Lawrence. 1974. Effort. Macdonald and Evans, London.
[28]
Alison E Leonard, Shaundra B Daily, Sophie Jörg, and Sabarish V Babu. 2021. Coding moves: Design and research of teaching computational thinking through dance choreography and virtual interactions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 53, 2 (2021), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1760754
[29]
Nitasha Mathayas, Lauren Vogelstein, Joshua Danish, Lindsay Lindberg, Ananda Marin, Andrea Kern, Marjorie Orellana, Meixi, Sean Dorr, Daniel Keefe, Vicente Diaz, Roni Zohar, Xintian Tu, Lana Cosic, Morgan Vickery, and Molly Kelton. 2022. Moving toward dignity-affirming invitations to embodied participation in the design of learning environments. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences(ICLS 2022). International Society of the Learning Sciences, 1739–1746. https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/8579/1/ICLS2022_1739-1746.pdf
[30]
Torun Mattsson and Suzanne Lundvall. 2015. The position of dance in physical education. Sport, Education and Society 20, 7 (2015), 855–871.
[31]
Maria Oliver-Hoyo and DeeDee Allen. 2006. The Use of Triangulation Methods in Qualitative Educational Research.Journal of College Science Teaching 35, 4 (2006), 42–47.
[32]
Dhaval Parmar, Joseph Isaac, Sabarish V. Babu, Nikeetha D’Souza, Alison E. Leonard, Sophie Jörg, Kara Gundersen, and Shaundra B. Daily. 2016. Programming moves: Design and evaluation of applying embodied interaction in virtual environments to enhance computational thinking in middle school students. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504696
[33]
William Christopher Payne, Yoav Bergner, Mary Etta West, Carlie Charp, R. Benjamin Benjamin Shapiro, Danielle Albers Szafir, Edd V. Taylor, and Kayla DesPortes. 2021. danceON: Culturally Responsive Creative Computing. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445149
[34]
Kristin A. Searle and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2015. Boys’ Needlework: Understanding Gendered and Indigenous Perspectives on Computing and Crafting with Electronic Textiles. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (Omaha, Nebraska, USA) (ICER ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2787622.2787724
[35]
Mirit Shamir, Mark Kocherovsky, and ChanJin Chung. 2019. A paradigm for teaching math and computer science concepts in k-12 learning environment by integrating coding, animation, dance, music and art. In 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC). IEEE, 62–68.
[36]
Mia S. Shaw, James Joshua Coleman, Ebony Elizabeth Thomas, and Yasmin B. Kafai. 2023. Restorying a Black girl’s future: Using womanist storytelling methodologies to reimagine dominant narratives in computing education. Journal of the Learning Sciences 32, 1 (2023), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2179847
[37]
Amber Solomon, Miyeon Bae, Betsy DiSalvo, and Mark Guzdial. 2020. Embodied representations in computing education: How gesture, embodied language, and tool use support teaching recursion. International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS). https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/6503/1/2133-2140.pdf
[38]
Amber Solomon, Mark Guzdial, Betsy DiSalvo, and Ben Rydal Shapiro. 2018. Applying a Gesture Taxonomy to Introductory Computing Concepts. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (Espoo, Finland) (ICER ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1145/3230977.3231001
[39]
Folashadé Solomon, Dionne Champion, Mariah Steele, and Tracey Wright. 2022. Embodied physics: Utilizing dance resources for learning and engagement in STEM. Journal of the Learning Sciences 31, 1 (2022), 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.2023543
[40]
Selena Steinberg, Melissa Gresalfi, Lauren Vogelstein, and Corey Brady. 2022. Coding choreography: Understanding student responses to representational incompatibilities between dance and programming. Journal of Research on Technology in Education (2022), 1–18.
[41]
Mike Stieff, Matthew Lira, and Stephanie Scopelitis. 2016. Gesture Supports Spatial Thinking in STEM. Cognition and Instruction 34 (04 2016), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1145122
[42]
Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. 1997. Grounded theory in practice. Sage.
[43]
Amanda Sullivan and Marina Umaschi Bers. 2018. Dancing robots: integrating art, music, and robotics in Singapore’s early childhood centers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28 (2018), 325–346.
[44]
Lauren Vogelstein. 2022. Choreographic Ways of Knowing as Generative Site for Stem Learning, Design, and Analysis. Ph. D. Dissertation. Vanderbilt University.
[45]
Lev Semenovich Vygotsky and Michael Cole. 1978. Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
[46]
Sandie H. Waters and Andrew S. Gibbons. 2004. Design Languages, Notation Systems, and Instructional Technology: A Case Study. Educational Technology Research and Development 52, 2 (2004), 57–68.
[47]
Zoom. 2023. Zoom. https://zoom.us/ Last accessed 21 November 2023.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Body and Code: A Distributed Cognition Exploration Into Dance and Computing Learning

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      C&C '24: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition
      June 2024
      718 pages
      ISBN:9798400704857
      DOI:10.1145/3635636
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 23 June 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. co-design
      2. computing education
      3. creative computing
      4. dance
      5. dance computing
      6. dance education

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      C&C '24
      Sponsor:
      C&C '24: Creativity and Cognition
      June 23 - 26, 2024
      IL, Chicago, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)296
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)45
      Reflects downloads up to 30 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media