research-article

Analyzing the politics of PD: a conceptual investigation

Authors:

PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2

Pages 205 - 206

https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662203

Published: 06 October 2014 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

This workshop discusses power, participation and the politics of PD. We propose a set of concepts and related questions for analyzing and deliberating these issues on the basis of participants' own experiences in PD projects. The conceptual framework we propose has been inspired by Schön's notion of 'design moves' and by Alfred Schütz' concept of choice. The PD experiences of workshop participants will be explored collaboratively with the aim of arriving at a deeper and more specific understanding of what the users participate in and how they can recognize their influence in the design result.

References

[1]

Bratteteig, T. & Wagner, I. Disentangling participation. Power and decision-making in Participatory Design. London/New York, Springer (forthcoming).

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Foucault, M. The Subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 1982, 8(4), 777--795.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[3]

Pitkin, H. F. Wittgenstein and justice. Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1972.

Google Scholar

[4]

Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 1973, 4(2), 155--169.

Google Scholar

[5]

Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner, New York, Basic Books, 1983.

Google Scholar

[6]

Schön, D. A., & Wiggins, G. Kinds of seeing and their function in designing. Design Studies, 1992, 13, 135--156.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Schütz, A. Choosing Among Projects of Action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1951, 12(2), 161--184.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

Schütz, A. On Multiple Realities. In A. Schütz (Ed.), Collected Papers I (pp. 207--259). Den Haag, Nijhoff, 1962

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Bråthen H(2024)Might Older Adult Participants Have the Richest Technological Imagination of Us All?: Experience as the Material Basis of ImaginationProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666099(197-207)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666099
Aryana BBrewster LNocera J(2018)Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory reviewHealth and Technology10.1007/s12553-018-0271-1Online publication date: 27-Oct-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0271-1

Index Terms

Analyzing the politics of PD: a conceptual investigation
1. Information systems
  1. Information systems applications
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Computing / technology policy

Recommendations

Does AI make PD obsolete?: exploring challenges from artificial intelligence to participatory design
PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2

In this paper¹, we explore if and how Artificial Intelligence (AI) challenges Participatory Design (PD). We base our analysis on the basic characteristics of AI and its subfield Machine Learning and discuss how and what kinds of design decisions users ...
FACIT PD: a framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

In this paper, we present a framework that describes commonly used design techniques for Participatory Design with children. Although there are many currently used techniques for designing with children, researchers working in differing contexts and in ...
Writing PD: accounting for socially-engaged research
PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2

As participants in participatory process, PD academics report on the practices and outcomes of their work and thereby shape what is known of individual projects and the wider field of participatory design. At present, there is a dominant form for this ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

PDC '14: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote abstracts - Volume 2

October 2014

278 pages

ISBN:9781450332149

DOI:10.1145/2662155

General Chairs:
Heike Winschiers-Theophilus
Windhoek, Polytechnic of Namibia, Namibia
,
Vincenzo D'Andrea
University of Trento, Italy
,
Program Chair:
Ole Sejer Iversen
Aarhus University, Denmark

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 October 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

PDC '14

PDC '14: Participatory Design Conference

October 6 - 10, 2014

Windhoek, Namibia

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 49 of 289 submissions, 17%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
115
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)2
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Bråthen H(2024)Might Older Adult Participants Have the Richest Technological Imagination of Us All?: Experience as the Material Basis of ImaginationProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666099(197-207)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3666094.3666099
Aryana BBrewster LNocera J(2018)Design for mobile mental health: an exploratory reviewHealth and Technology10.1007/s12553-018-0271-1Online publication date: 27-Oct-2018
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-018-0271-1

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Does AI make PD obsolete?: exploring challenges from artificial intelligence to participatory design

FACIT PD: a framework for analysis and creation of intergenerational techniques for participatory design

Writing PD: accounting for socially-engaged research