skip to main content
10.1145/2441776.2441835acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ACES: a cross-discipline platform and method for communication and language research

Published: 23 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

While conducting research focused on individuals with impairments is vitally important, such experiments often have high costs (time and money), and researchers may be limited in the instructions they can give, or participant feedback they can gather (due to the impairment). We present how an impairment emulation system (ACES) can be used by researchers in the behavioral sciences. By repurposing this new technology within the context of a "traditional" psychology experiment, we were able to analyze impaired linguistic and communication in a manner that was not possible without a system such as ACES. Our experiment on 96 participants provided strong support for a theory in the aphasia psychology community, and uncovered new understandings of how people communicate when one interlocutor's speech is distorted with aphasia. These findings illustrate a new direction of HCI research that directly helps researchers in Psychology, Communication, and Speech and Hearing Science.

References

[1]
Al Mahmud, A., Gerits, R., and Martens, J. Xtag: designing an experience capturing and sharing tool for persons with aphasia. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, ACM (2010), 325--334.
[2]
Al Mahmud, A., and Martens, J. Understanding email communication of persons with aphasia. In Extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2011), 1195--1200.
[3]
Allen, M., McGrenere, J., and Purves, B. The design and field evaluation of phototalk: a digital image communication application for people. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ACM (2007), 187--194.
[4]
Bard, E., Anderson, A., Chen, Y., Nicholson, H., Havard, C., and Dalzel-Job, S. Let's you do that: Sharing the cognitive burdens of dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 4 (2007), 616--641.
[5]
Benson, D. Aphasia, Alexia and Agraphia: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Monographs. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1979.
[6]
Benson, D. The neurology of thinking. Oxford University Press, USA, 1994.
[7]
Beun, R., and Cremers, A. Object reference in a shared domain of conversation. Pragmatics & Cognition, 6 1, 2 (1998), 121--152.
[8]
Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., and Wright, Z. Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, ACM (2002), 135--140.
[9]
Boyd-Graber, J., Nikolova, S., Moffatt, K., Kin, K., Lee, J., Mackey, L., Tremaine, M., and Klawe, M. Participatory design with proxies: developing a desktop-pda system to support people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, ACM (2006), 151--160.
[10]
Brown-Schmidt, S., and Tanenhaus, M. Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive science 32, 4 (2008), 643--684.
[11]
Colby, K., Weber, S., and Hilf, F. Artificial paranoia. Artificial Intelligence 2, 1 (1971), 1--25.
[12]
Cushman, W., and Rosenberg, D. Human factors in product design. Advances in human factors/ergonomics 14 (1991).
[13]
Duck, S., Rutt, D., HOY, M., and STREJC, H. Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships all communications are not created equal. Human communication research 18, 2 (1991), 228--267.
[14]
Giles, H. A study of speech patterns in social interaction: Accent evaluation and accent change. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 1971.
[15]
Goodglass, H., Goodglass, and Kaplan. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination: Stimulus Cards - Short Form. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
[16]
Hailpern, J., Danilevsky, M., Harris, A., Karahalios, K., Dell, G., and Hengst, J. Aces: Promoting empathy towards aphasia through language distortion emulation software. In Proceedings of the ACM's SIG CHI Conference 2011 Conference., CHI 2011, ACM (Vancouver, BC Canada, 2011).
[17]
Hailpern, J., Danilevsky, M., and Karahalios, K. Aces: Aphasia emulation, realism, and the turing test. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGACCESS - ASSETS 2011 Conference., ASSETS 2011, ACM (Dundee, Scotland, 2011).
[18]
Hardin, J., and Hilbe, J. Generalized estimating equations. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York, 2003.
[19]
Hartsuiker, R., and Kolk, H. Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production. Brain and Language 62, 2 (1998), 221--254.
[20]
Hecht, M. The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research 4, 3 (1978), 253--264.
[21]
Henry, S. Just ask: integrating accessibility throughout design. Lulu. com, 2007.
[22]
Jurafsky, D., Martin, J., Kehler, A., Vander Linden, K., and Ward, N. Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition, vol. 163. MIT Press, 2000.
[23]
Kirvesoja, H. Experimental ergonomic evaluation with user trials: EEE product development procedures. Oulun yliopisto, 2001.
[24]
Kolk, H. A time-based approach to agrammatic production. Brain and Language 50, 3 (1995), 282--303.
[25]
Kolk, H., and Heeschen, C. Adaptation symptoms and impairment symptoms in broca's aphasia. Aphasiology 4, 3 (1990), 221--231.
[26]
Kolk, H., and Heeschen, G. The malleability of agrammatic symptoms: A reply to hesketh and bishop. Aphasiology 10, 1 (1996), 81--96.
[27]
Kolk, H., and Van Grunsven, M. Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology (1985).
[28]
Leshed, G. Automated language-based feedback for teamwork behaviors. PhD thesis, Cornell University, 2009.
[29]
Menn, L., Kamio, A., Hayashi, M., Fujita, I., Sasanuma, S., and Boles, L. The role of empathy in sentence production: A functional analysis of aphasic and normal elicited narratives in Japanese and English. Function and Structure (1998), 317--356.
[30]
Menn, L., Reilly, K., Hayashi, M., Kamio, A., Fujita, I., and Sasanuma, S. The interaction of preserved pragmatics and impaired syntax in Japanese and English aphasic speech. Brain and language 61, 2 (1998), 183--225.
[31]
Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., and Klawe, M. The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2004), 407--414.
[32]
Nguyen, D., and Rosé, C. Language use as a reflection of socialization in online communities. ACL HLT 2011 (2011), 76.
[33]
Niederhoffer, K. G., and Pennebaker, J. W. Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21, 4 (2002), 337--360.
[34]
Piper, A., Weibel, N., and Hollan, J. Introducing multimodal paper-digital interfaces for speech-language therapy. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ACM (2010), 203--210.
[35]
Ruiter, M., Kolk, H., and Rietveld, T. Speaking in ellipses: The effect of a compensatory style of speech on functional communication in chronic agrammatism. Neuropsychological rehabilitation 20, 3 (2010), 423--458.
[36]
Ruiter, M. B. Speaking in ellipses: The effect of a compensatory style of speech on functional communication in chronic agrammatism. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2008.
[37]
Saffran, E., Berndt, R., and Schwartz, M. The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language 37, 3 (1989), 440--479.
[38]
Salis, C., and Edwards, S. Treatment of written verb and written sentence production in an individual with aphasia: A clinical study. Aphasiology 24, 9 (2010), 1051--1063.
[39]
Scissors, L., Gill, A., Geraghty, K., and Gergle, D. In cmc we trust: the role of similarity. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2009), 527--536.
[40]
Scissors, L., Gill, A., and Gergle, D. Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based cmc. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2008), 277--280.
[41]
Shannon, C., and Weaver, W. The mathematical theory of communication, vol. 19. University of Illinois Press Urbana, 1962.
[42]
Shewan, C., and Kertesz, A. Reliability and validity characteristics of the western aphasia battery (wab). Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 45, 3 (1980), 308.
[43]
Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind. In ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, no. 77-78, ACM (2004), 177--184.
[44]
Thompson, C., Ballard, K., Tait, M., Weintraub, S., and Mesulam, M. Patterns of language decline in non-fluent primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 11, 4-5 (1997), 297--321.
[45]
Toma, C. Perceptions of trustworthiness online: The role of visual and textual information. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2010), 13--22.
[46]
Wang, H., and Fussell, S. Groups in groups: Conversational similarity in online multicultural multiparty brainstorming. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2010), 351--360.
[47]
Weizenbaum, J. Contextual understanding by computers. Communications of the ACM 10, 8 (1967), 480.
[48]
Wilkes-Gibbs, D., and Clark, H. Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 2 (1992), 183--194.
[49]
Wilson, J., Straus, S., and McEvily, B. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 99, 1 (2006), 16--33.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. ACES: a cross-discipline platform and method for communication and language research

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '13: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
    February 2013
    1594 pages
    ISBN:9781450313315
    DOI:10.1145/2441776
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 23 February 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. aphasia
    2. assistive technology
    3. disabilities
    4. empathy
    5. emulation software
    6. language
    7. messaging
    8. speech

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW '13
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '13: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 23 - 27, 2013
    Texas, San Antonio, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media