skip to main content
10.1145/1329125.1329357acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A near-optimal strategy for a heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em poker tournament

Published: 14 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

We analyze a heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em poker tournament with a fixed small blind of 300 chips, a fixed big blind of 600 chips and a total amount of 8000 chips on the table (until recently, these parameters defined the heads-up endgame of sit-n-go tournaments on the popular Party-Poker.com online poker site). Due to the size of this game, a computation of an optimal (i.e. minimax) strategy for the game is completely infeasible. However, combining an algorithm due to Koller, Megiddo and von Stengel with concepts of Everett and suggestions of Sklansky, we compute an optimal jam/fold strategy, i.e. a strategy that would be optimal if any bet made by the player playing by the strategy (but not bets of his opponent) had to be his entire stack. Our computations establish that the computed strategy is near-optimal for the unrestricted tournament (i.e., with post-flop play being allowed) in the rigorous sense that a player playing by the computed strategy will win the tournament with a probability within 1.4 percentage points of the probability that an optimal strategy (allowing post-flop play) would give.

References

[1]
R. Andersson. Pseudo-optimal Strategies in No-Limit Poker. Master's thesis, Umeå University, May 2006.
[2]
D. Billings, N. Burch, A. Davidson, R. Holte, J. Schaeffer, T. Schauenberg, and D. Szafron. Approximating Game-Theoretic Optimal Strategies for Full-Scale Poker. In IJCAI, 2003.
[3]
J. R. S. Blair, D. Mutchler, M. van Lent. Perfect Recall and Pruning in Games with Imperfect Information. Computational Intelligence, 12:131--154, 1996.
[4]
A. Condon. The Complexity of Stochastic Games. Information and Computation, pages 203--224, 1992.
[5]
A. Condon. On Algorithms for Simple Stochastic Games. Advances in Computational Complexity Theory, DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 13:51--73, 1993.
[6]
J. Czyzyk, S. Mehrotra, M. Wagner, S. J. Wright. PCx: An Interior-Point Code for Linear Programming. Optimization Methods and Software, 12:397--430, 1999.
[7]
M. Dhiflaoui, S. Funke, C. Kwappik, K. Mehlhorn, M. Seel, E. Schmer, R. Schulte, and D. Weber. Certifying and Repairing Solutions to Large LPs, How Good are LP-Solvers? In SODA, pages 255--256, 2003.
[8]
H. Everett. Recursive games. In Contributions to the Theory of Games Vol. III, Vol 39 of Annals of Mathematical Studies, 1957.
[9]
A. Gilpin and T. Sandholm. Optimal Rhode Island Hold'em Poker. In AAAI, 2005.
[10]
A. Gilpin and T. Sandholm. Finding Equilibria in Large Sequential Games of Incomplete Information. In Electronic Commerce, pages 160--169, 2006.
[11]
A. Gilpin and T. Sandholm. A Texas Hold'em poker player based on automated abstraction and real-time equilibrium computation. In AAMAS, 2006.
[12]
D. Koller, N. Megiddo, and B. von Stengel. Fast Algorithms for Finding Randomized Strategies in Game Trees. In STOC, pages 750--759, 1994.
[13]
J. Shi and M. L. Littman. Abstraction Methods for Game Theoretic Poker. In Computers and Games, pages 333--345, 2001.
[14]
D. Sklansky. Tournament Poker for Advanced Players. Two Plus Two Publishing, 2002.
[15]
D. Sklansky. Card Player Magazine, 2003.
[16]
T. Streib. Blind versus Blind Play in Tournament Situations, Nov. 2005. Two Plus Two Internet Magazine (twoplustwo.com).

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A near-optimal strategy for a heads-up no-limit Texas Hold'em poker tournament

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AAMAS '07: Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
    May 2007
    1585 pages
    ISBN:9788190426275
    DOI:10.1145/1329125
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • IFAAMAS

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 May 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. game playing
    2. game theory
    3. poker
    4. tournament

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    AAMAS07
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)46
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
    Reflects downloads up to 12 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media