skip to main content
10.1145/3459990.3460701acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Systematic Review of Empowerment in Child-Computer Interaction Research

Published: 24 June 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Based on a systematic review we explore how empowerment has been articulated in 188 papers in Child-Computer Interaction (CCI) literature since 2003. Using an existing framework outlining functional, educational, democratic, mainstream, and critical empowerment, our analysis shows that while empowerment is rarely defined in CCI papers, a wide range of different articulations coexists. We explore the prevalence of different articulations in the literature and how this has shifted over time. We show that although empowerment has been part of the CCI discourse since the early days, a shift can be noticed in terms of how empowerment is articulated from an emphasis on empowerment in its functional meaning towards a more even distribution and the advent of critical articulations of empowerment. We conclude the paper by looking ahead into a new decade of CCI research and posing three questions to assist CCI researchers in more clearly articulating the nature and understanding of empowerment.

References

[1]
Majid Al-Haj. 1995. Education, Empowerment, and Control: The Case of the Arabs in Israel. State University of New York Press, Albany.
[2]
Hanne Voldborg Andersen and Kati Pitkänen. 2019. Empowering educators by developing professional practice in digital fabrication and design thinking. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 21, (September 2019), 1–16.
[3]
Hilary Arksey and Lisa O'Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, 1 (February 2005), 19–32.
[4]
Rahul Banerjee, Jason Yip, Kung Jin Lee, and Zoran Popović. 2016. Empowering Children To Rapidly Author Games and Animations Without Writing Code. In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’16), Association for Computing Machinery, Manchester, United Kingdom, 230–237.
[5]
Gro Bjerknes and Tone Bratteteig. 1995. User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 7, 1 (January 1995). Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol7/iss1/1
[6]
Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. Participatory design and “democratizing innovation.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC ’10), Association for Computing Machinery, Sydney, Australia, 41–50.
[7]
Paulo Blikstein. 2008. Travels in Troy with Freire: Technology as an agent of emancipation. Social justice education for teachers: Paulo Freire and the possible dream (January 2008), 205–244.
[8]
Amy Bruckman and Alisa Bandlow. 2002. Human-computer interaction for kids. In The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 428–440.
[9]
Anne-Emmanuèle Calvès. 2009. Empowerment: The History of a Key Concept in Contemporary Development Discourse. Revue Tiers-Monde 4, 200 (January 2009), 735–749.
[10]
Tamara Clegg, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Jason Yip, Helene Gelderblom, Alex Kuhn, Tobin Valenstein, Becky Lewittes, and Allison Druin. 2012. Technology for promoting scientific practice and personal meaning in life-relevant learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’12), Association for Computing Machinery, Bremen, Germany, 152–161.
[11]
Andrew Clement. 1994. Computing at work: empowering action by “low-level users.” Commun. ACM 37, 1 (January 1994), 52-ff.
[12]
Merijke Coenraad, Jen Palmer, Diana Franklin, and David Weintrop. 2019. Enacting Identities: Participatory Design as a Context for Youth to Reflect, Project, and Apply their Emerging Identities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, Boise, ID, USA, 185–196.
[13]
Patrick L. Courts. 1991. Literacy and Empowerment: The Meaning Makers. Praeger, New York.
[14]
Shruti Dhariwal. 2018. Scratch memories: a visualization tool for children to celebrate and reflect on their creative trajectories. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, Trondheim, Norway, 449–455.
[15]
Betsy DiSalvo and Kayla DesPortes. 2017. Participatory Design for Value-Driven Learning. In Participatory Design for Learning.
[16]
Andrea A. DiSessa. 2000. Changing Minds: Computers, Learning and Literacy. The MIT Press. Retrieved January 25, 2020 from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/changing-minds
[17]
Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21, (2002), 1–25.
[18]
Allison Druin, Ben Bederson, Angela Boltman, Adrian Miura, Debby Knotts-Callahan, and Mark Platt. 1998. Children as our technology design partners. In The design of children's technology. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 51–72.
[19]
Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (PDC ’08), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, 92–101.
[20]
Marie Ertner, Anne Mie Kragelund, and Lone Malmborg. 2010. Five enunciations of empowerment in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC ’10), Association for Computing Machinery, Sydney, Australia, 191–194.
[21]
European Commission. An open, democratic and sustainable digital society. Shaping Europe's digital future - European Commission. Retrieved January 31, 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/content/open-democratic-and-sustainable-digital-society
[22]
Jerry Alan Fails, Mona Leigh Guha, and Allison Druin. 2013. Methods and Techniques for Involving Children in the Design of New Technology for Children. Found. Trends Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 2 (December 2013), 85–166.
[23]
J. L. Fleiss, J. Cohen, and B. S. Everitt. 1969. Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. Psychological Bulletin 72, 5 (1969), 323.
[24]
Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Alyssa Alcorn, and Helen Pain. 2013. Conversing through and about technologies: Design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research(er) perspectives. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 2 (May 2013), 38–49.
[25]
Paulo Freire. 1968. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Seabury Press, New York.
[26]
Michail Giannakos and Letizia Jaccheri. 2018. From players to makers: An empirical examination of factors that affect creative game development. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 18, (June 2018).
[27]
Shuchi Grover and Roy Pea. 2013. Computational Thinking in K–12 A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher 42, (February 2013), 38–43.
[28]
Mona Leigh Guha, Allison Druin, and Jerry Alan Fails. 2013. Cooperative Inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (January 2013), 14–23.
[29]
Lorraine Gutierrez. 1994. Beyond Coping: An Empowerment Perspective on Stressful Life Events. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 21, 3 (September 1994). Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol21/iss3/13
[30]
Cynthia Hardy and Sharon Leiba-O'Sullivan. 1998. The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice. Human Relations 51, (1998), 451–483.
[31]
Christopher Hoadley. 2017. How Participatory Design Has Influenced the Learning Sciences. In Participatory Design for Learning.
[32]
Michael S. Horn and Robert J. K. Jacob. 2007. Tangible programming in the classroom with tern. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’07), Association for Computing Machinery, San Jose, CA, USA, 1965–1970.
[33]
Juan Pablo Hourcade. 2008. Interaction Design and Children. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 1, 4 (2008), 277–392.
[34]
Juan Pablo Hourcade. 2015. Child-Computer Interaction (First Edition edition ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
[35]
Netta Iivari and Marianne Kinnula. 2018. Empowering children through design and making: towards protagonist role adoption. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, Hasselt and Genk, Belgium, 1–12.
[36]
Netta Iivari, Marianne Kinnula, and Leena Kuure. 2015. With best intentions: A Foucauldian examination on children's genuine participation in ICT design. Information Technology & People 28, 2 (January 2015), 246–280.
[37]
Netta Iivari and Kari Kuutti. 2018. Critical design in interaction design and children: impossible, inappropriate or critical imperative? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, Trondheim, Norway, 456–464.
[38]
Ole Sejer Iversen and Christian Dindler. 2013. A Utopian agenda in child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (January 2013), 24–29.
[39]
Ole Sejer Iversen, Anne Marie Kanstrup, and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2004. A visit to the “new Utopia”: revitalizing democracy, emancipation and quality in co-operative design. In Proceedings of the third Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (NordiCHI ’04), Association for Computing Machinery, Tampere, Finland, 171–179.
[40]
Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Christian Dindler. 2017. Child as Protagonist: Expanding the Role of Children in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, Stanford, California, USA, 27–37.
[41]
Yasmin B. Kafai. 2016. From computational thinking to computational participation in K–12 education. Commun. ACM 59, 8 (July 2016), 26–27.
[42]
Yasmin Kafai, Chris Proctor, and Debora Lui. 2019. From Theory Bias to Theory Dialogue: Embracing Cognitive, Situated, and Critical Framings of Computational Thinking in K-12 CS Education. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, Toronto ON, Canada, 101–109.
[43]
Saba Kawas, Ye Yuan, Akeiylah DeWitt, Qiao Jin, Susanne Kirchner, Abigail Bilger, Ethan Grantham, Julie A Kientz, Andrea Tartaro, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2020. Another decade of IDC research: examining and reflecting on values and ethics. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 205–215.
[44]
Marianne Kinnula and Netta Iivari. 2019. Empowered to Make a Change: Guidelines for Empowering the Young Generation in and through Digital Technology Design. In Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference (FabLearn Europe ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, Oulu, Finland, 1–8.
[45]
Marianne Kinnula and Netta Iivari. 2021. Manifesto for children's genuine participation in digital technology design and making. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 28, (June 2021), 100244.
[46]
Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, Tonja Molin-Juustila, Eino Keskitalo, Topi Leinonen, Eetu Mansikkamäki, Toni Käkelä, and Martti Similä. 2017. Cooperation, Combat, or Competence Building – What Do We Mean When We Are ‘Empowering Children’ in and through Digital Technology Design? ICIS 2017 Proceedings (December 2017). Retrieved from https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2017/TransformingSociety/Presentations/15
[47]
Siu-Cheung Kong, Ming Ming Chiu, and Ming Lai. 2018. A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education 127, (December 2018), 178–189.
[48]
Sirkku Kotilainen, Jussi Okkonen, Guna Spurava, Ole Sejer Iversen, Netta Iivari, Marianne Kinnula, and Sumita Sharma. 2020. Researchers’ Toolbox for the Future: Empowering Children to Shape Their Future. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–3. Retrieved January 31, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420082
[49]
S. Lukes. 1974. Power: A Radical View. Macmillan, London.
[50]
Betsy McCarthy, Linlin Li, Michelle Tiu, and Sara Atienza. 2013. PBS KIDS mathematics transmedia suites in preschool homes. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, 128–136.
[51]
Mary McHugh. 2012. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia medica: časopis Hrvatskoga društva medicinskih biokemičara / HDMB 22, (October 2012), 276–82.
[52]
Brenna McNally, Matthew Louis Mauriello, Mona Leigh Guha, and Allison Druin. 2017. Gains from Participatory Design Team Membership as Perceived by Child Alumni and their Parents. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5730–5741.
[53]
Saila Ovaska, Pentti Hietala, and Marjatta Kangassalo. 2003. Electronic whiteboard in kindergarten: opportunities and requirements. In Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’03), Association for Computing Machinery, Preston, England, 15–22.
[54]
Seymour Papert. 1988. A Critique of Technocentrism in Thinking About the School of the Future. In Children in the Information Age, Blagovest Sendov and Ivan Stanchev (eds.). Pergamon, 3–18.
[55]
Seymour A. Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, And Powerful Ideas (1st edition ed.). Basic Books, New York.
[56]
Seymour Papert and Idit Harel. 1991. Situating Constructionism. Constructionism 36, 2 (1991), 1–11.
[57]
Huey L. Perry. 1980. The socioeconomic impact of black political empowerment in a rural southern locality. Rural Sociology 45, 2 (1980), 207–222.
[58]
Kai Petersen, Sairam Vakkalanka, and Ludwik Kuzniarz. 2015. Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology 64, (August 2015), 1–18.
[59]
Mark Petticrew and Helen Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey, US.
[60]
Erika S. Poole and Tamara Peyton. 2013. Interaction design research with adolescents: methodological challenges and best practices. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, New York, USA, 211–217.
[61]
J. C. Read and P. Markopoulos. 2013. Child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 1 (January 2013), 2–6.
[62]
Janet C. Read, Daniel Fitton, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Giving ideas an equal chance: inclusion and representation in participatory design with children. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’14), Association for Computing Machinery, Aarhus, Denmark, 105–114.
[63]
Janet C. Read, Juan Pablo Hourcade, Panos Markopoulos, and Allison Druin. 2011. Child computer interaction invited SIG: IDC remixed, CCI remapped. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’11), Association for Computing Machinery, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 689–691.
[64]
Mitchel Resnick. 2017. Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play. MIT Press. Retrieved January 25, 2020 from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/lifelong-kindergarten
[65]
Judy Robertson, Andrew Macvean, and Katy Howland. 2012. Embedding technology in the classroom: the train the teacher model. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’12), Association for Computing Machinery, Bremen, Germany, 20–29.
[66]
T. Robertson and J. Simonsen. 2013. Participatory design: An introduction. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, Oxford.
[67]
Yvonne Rogers. 2011. Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. interactions 18, 4 (July 2011), 58–62.
[68]
Yvonne Rogers and Paul Marshall. 2017. Research in the Wild. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 10, 3 (April 2017), i–97.
[69]
Sumita Sharma, Krishnaveni Achary, Marianne Kinnula, Netta Iivari, and Blessin Varkey. 2020. Gathering garbage or going green? shifting social perspectives to empower individuals with special needs. In Proceedings of the Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 311–322.
[70]
Hannah Snyder. 2019. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104, (November 2019), 333–339.
[71]
Barbara Bryant Solomon. 1976. Black Empowerment: Social Work in Oppressed Communities. Columbia University Press.
[72]
Mike Tissenbaum, Josh Sheldon, and Hal Abelson. 2019. From computational thinking to computational action. Commun. ACM 62, 3 (February 2019), 34–36.
[73]
Ari Tuhkala, Marie-Louise Wagner, Ole Sejer Iversen, and Tommi Kärkkäinen. 2019. Technology Comprehension — Combining computing, design, and societal reflection as a national subject. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 20, (June 2019), 54–63.
[74]
Maarten Van Mechelen, Ann Laenen, Bieke Zaman, Bert Willems, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2019. Collaborative Design Thinking (CoDeT): A co-design approach for high child-to-adult ratios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130, (October 2019), 179–195.
[75]
Maarten Van Mechelen, Alice Schut, Mathieu Gielen, and Antonia Clasina Södergren. 2019. Children's Assessment of Co-design Skills: Creativity, Empathy and Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, Boise, ID, USA, 520–526.
[76]
Maarten Van Mechelen, Marie-Louise Wagner, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Rachel Charlotte Smith, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2021. Digital Design Literacy in K-9 Education: Experiences from Pioneer Teachers. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, Athens, Greece.
[77]
Greg Walsh, Alison Druin, Mona Leigh Guha, Elizabeth Foss, Evan Golub, Leshell Hatley, Elizabeth Bonsignore, and Sonia Franckel. 2010. Layered elaboration: a new technique for co-design with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1237–1240.
[78]
Greg Walsh and Elizabeth Foss. 2015. A case for intergenerational distributed co-design: the online kidsteam example. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’15), Association for Computing Machinery, Boston, Massachusetts, 99–108.
[79]
Anne Weibert, Marios Mouratidis, Renad Khateb, Sarah Rüller, Miriam Hosak, Shpresa Potka, Konstantin Aal, and Volker Wulf. 2017. Creating Environmental Awareness with Upcycling Making Activities: A Study of Children in Germany and Palestine. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’17), Association for Computing Machinery, Stanford, California, USA, 286–291.
[80]
Judith Bula Wise. 2005. Empowerment Practice with Families in Distress. Columbia University Press.
[81]
Kwok-Fu Wong. 2016. Empowerment as a panacea for poverty - old wine in new bottles? Reflections on the World Bank's conception of power: Progress in Development Studies (August 2016).
[82]
Svetlana Yarosh. 2015. Designing technology to empower children to communicate with non-residential parents. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 3–4, (January 2015), 1–13.
[83]
Svetlana Yarosh, Iulian Radu, Seth Hunter, and Eric Rosenbaum. 2011. Examining values: an analysis of nine years of IDC research. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’11), Association for Computing Machinery, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 136–144.
[84]
Xin Zhou, Yuqin Jin, He Zhang, Shanshan Li, and Xin Huang. 2016. A Map of Threats to Validity of Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. In 2016 23rd Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), 153–160.
[85]
Abigail Zimmermann-Niefield, Makenna Turner, Bridget Murphy, Shaun K. Kane, and R. Benjamin Shapiro. 2019. Youth Learning Machine Learning through Building Models of Athletic Moves. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, Boise, ID, USA, 121–132.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Effects of User-Agent and User-Designer Similarity in Virtual Human Design to Promote Mental Health Intentions for College StudentsACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/368982222:1(1-41)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Promoting Criticality with Design Futuring with Young ChildrenProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685335(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Discussing the Protagonist Role of Students in Game-Based LearningProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770658:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
IDC '21: Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference
June 2021
697 pages
ISBN:9781450384520
DOI:10.1145/3459990
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Badges

  • Honorable Mention

Author Tags

  1. CCI Research
  2. Child-Computer Interaction
  3. Empowering Children
  4. Empowerment
  5. Systematic Review

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • VILLUM FONDEN
  • It-Vest

Conference

IDC '21
Sponsor:
IDC '21: Interaction Design and Children
June 24 - 30, 2021
Athens, Greece

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 172 of 578 submissions, 30%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)120
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7
Reflects downloads up to 23 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Exploring the Effects of User-Agent and User-Designer Similarity in Virtual Human Design to Promote Mental Health Intentions for College StudentsACM Transactions on Applied Perception10.1145/368982222:1(1-41)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Promoting Criticality with Design Futuring with Young ChildrenProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685335(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Discussing the Protagonist Role of Students in Game-Based LearningProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36770658:CHI PLAY(1-24)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Learning an Explanatory Model of Data-Driven Technologies can Lead to Empowered Behavior: A Mixed-Methods Study in K-12 Computing EducationProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671118(326-342)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Moving Between the Virtual and Real - Children Trying Out a Metaverse Digital TwinProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3659398(806-810)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Transformative agency – the next step towards children's computational empowermentProceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3628516.3655806(322-337)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Infrastructuring Digital Literacy in K-12 Education: A National Case StudyInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100697(100697)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)Let’s get them on board: Focus group discussions with adolescents on empowering leisure engagement in Fab Labs and makerspacesInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100669(100669)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)Situating computational empowerment in formal educationInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10060438:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Nature and Natural Rhythm in the Digital World - What's in It for Child–Computer Interaction?: A narrative literature review and an initial design framework26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3616961.3616989(119-132)Online publication date: 2-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media