|
Historical Background
An Emergent Nationalism, 1815-1828 (continued)
POWER DIPLOMACYCONTINENTAL DEFINITION AND HEMISPHERIC
SECURITY
During the years 1815-28 the United States
showed more self-confidence in foreign affairs. Diplomats and soldiers
added Spanish Florida to the national domain. Treaties settled a portion
of the United States-Canadian boundary dispute and partially cleared
the way for a U.S. foothold in the Pacific Northwest. In support of the
Latin American independence movement, President Monroe warned European
nations to stay out of the Western Hemisphere. To consolidate the "good
feelings" that greeted his election, he selected a Cabinet
representative of the Nation's major geographical sections. A New England
member of the Cabinet was Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, the son
of President John Adams. The younger Adams proved most able.
The first diplomatic success of the Monroe
administration was the Rush-Bagot Agreement of 1817. Monroe as Secretary
of State and Adams as Minister to Great Britain, both under Madison, had
laid the groundwork for the agreement. It reduced armaments on the Great
Lakes to a minimum. Although complete border disarmament did not come
about until the Treaty of Washington (1871), the Rush-Bagot Agreement
was an important precedent.
The Oregon question was more difficult. The United
States, Great Britain, Spain, and Russia all claimed that ill-defined
region. By negotiation, Adams succeeded in persuading Russia and Spain
to renounce their claims. But both Great Britain and the United States
claimed discovery of the region and fur traders from both countries were
operating there. The decision, in 1818, was to postpone solution. The
two nations agreed to occupy the Oregon country jointly for a decade,
and in 1827 joint occupancy was extended for an additional decade.
In the South, Adams capitalized on Spain's colonial
difficulties and Andrew Jackson's aggressive military activities to add
Spanish Florida to the United States. After the Napoleonic Wars the
Spanish colonial empire was tottering. Uprisings in Spain's vast South
American domain required all the military effort she could muster. She
had little capability to defend a minor and strategically exposed colony
such as Florida. The Spanish knew that the United States wanted to
acquire Florida. They probably expected to lose it, but they wanted
something in return.
To Don Luis de Onis, Spanish Minister to the United
States, fell the task of negotiating the Florida issue. In 1815 he
demanded U.S. repudiation of the Louisiana Purchase and acceptance of
the Mississippi as the western boundary in exchange for Florida. As
Spain's situation worsened, in 1817 Onis abandoned his demands for
repudiation of the Louisiana Purchase and moved the proposed
southwestern boundary west to a north-south line in central Louisiana
between the Mermentau and Calcasieu Rivers. He would not concede any
territory beyond this line. Adams held out for the Colorado River of
Texas as the southwestern boundary of the United States. The
negotiations were deadlocked.
|
John Quincy Adams. An
experienced diplomat, he became Secretary of State and then President.
From a lithograph by D. W. Kellogg and Company. Courtesy, Library of Congress. |
In 1818 Andrew Jackson broke the stalemate by action.
Under orders from Washington, he led a military force from Fort Scott,
Ga., into Spanish Florida to punish the Seminole Indians and runaway
slaves for their continuing assaults on Georgia settlers. After making
only minor contact with the Seminoles, Jackson determined to exceed his
orders. He led his army across northern Florida, during which time he
executed several Seminoles and two British subjects. The high points of
the expedition were the seizures of the Spanish forts at St. Marks and
Pensacola.
When the news of the exploit reached Washington,
Jackson was again the hero of the hour. Although his violation of
Spanish sovereignty was embarrassing to the United States, at the same
time it strengthened Adams' hand in his negotiations with Onis, for
Jackson had demonstrated the weakness of Spain's grip on Florida. The
Adams-Onis, or Transcontinental, Treaty of 1819 followed shortly
thereafter. Spain ceded Florida to the United States, and the Sabine
Rivera portion of the present Texas-Louisiana borderbecame
the Southwestern boundary of the United States. The Western boundary
continued then generally northwest along the Red River to the 100th
meridian, north along the 100th meridian to the Arkansas River, west on
the Arkansas to the Sangre de Cristo Mountains, north to the 42d
parallel, and thence west to the Pacific. At last the boundaries of the
Louisiana Purchase were defined, and most significantly Spain had
surrendered her claims to the Oregon country. In return, the United
States agreed to pay $5 million in claims of U.S. citizens in the
acquired territory against Spain. It was a good treaty for the United
States.
One after another, between 1811 and 1825 Spanish and
Portuguese colonies in South and Central America declared political
independence, as Simon Bolivar and Jose San Martin flashed across the
pages of history. Spain's only hope of recovering her colonies, and it
was a slim one, depended upon aid from other European nations. In 1815
the rulers of France, Russia, and Prussia joined Ferdinand VII of Spain
in the Holy Alliance. Its purpose was preservation of the old regimes of
Europe against a growing wave of antimonarchist sentiment. The alliance
was too busy with European problems to intervene actively in Latin
America, but it did show disapproval of the newly independent nations by
refusing them diplomatic recognition.
In the United States sentiment was strong for
recognition of and assistance to the struggling peoples. Were not the
Latin Americans rebelling against colonialism and injustice just as the
United States had in 1776? Despite the promptings of Henry Clay and
other leaders for recognition, Monroe and Adams hesitated to do so
until the Florida negotiations with Spain were completed. So it was
only after the Adams-Onis Treaty that the United States moved toward
support of the new nations, and in 1822 she officially recognized them.
Belated though the recognition was, it was the first to be made by
non-Latin American countries.
|
St. John's Episcopal Church, in
1816, shortly after its construction. The White House, in the
background, is in the process of being renovated following its burning
by the British, in 1814. From a drawing by
Benjamin H. Latrobe, architect of the church. |
Prompted by the revolutionary struggle, a British
proposal for an Anglo-American alliance to prevent European intervention
in the affairs of the Western Hemisphere brought about the Monroe
Doctrine. In the beginning, it was not a "doctrine" but a declaration
incorporated in President Monroe's Sixth Annual Message to Congress, in
1823. Monroe, with the concurrence of the elder statesmen Madison and
Jefferson, had inclined toward acceptance of the British proposal for a
joint Anglo-American policy of opposition to European encroachment. But
John Quincy Adams was determined to avoid entangling
alliancesespecially one that might embarrass future U.S. efforts
to annex Cuba and Texas. Adams was adamant, and Monroe concurred in his
reasoning. The Monroe Doctrine was the result. It promised that the
United States would not interfere in purely European affairs, nor in the
affairs of "existing colonies or dependencies" in the Western
Hemisphere. It warned that the United States would consider as
unfriendly action any European intervention in the affairs of
independent hemispheric nations that were recognized by the United
States. Lastly, it declared that Europe should consider the Western
Hemisphere "out of bounds" for further colonization.
Great Britain reacted with irritation to the
declaration. After all, if any nation in 1823 had the power to enforce
Monroe's declaration, it was Great Britain. The U.S. public applauded
Monroe's words, then soon forgot them. But future American statesmen
would remember them. In 1845 President Polk would reaffirm the
declaration in connection with the Oregon boundary dispute with Great
Britain. From the time of the Civil War, it would become an active and
vital diplomatic policy. In 1823, however, it was not an expression of
national power. Rather it was an exposition of basic principles of U.S.
foreign policy as they had evolved since 1776.
http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/founders-frontiersmen/intro14.htm
Last Updated: 29-Aug-2005
|