The Cubs swung perhaps the most shocking trade of the summer so far today when they acquired third baseman Isaac Paredes from the Rays in exchange for young slugger Christopher Morel, relief prospect Hunter Bigge, and pitching prospect Ty Johnson. Paredes, as one of the best hitters available this summer, was rumored to be of interest to a number of win-now clubs such as the Dodgers, Yankees, and Mariners, but instead ended up in Chicago with a club that’s just 51-56 last year and recently saw its president of baseball operations admit the club was prioritizing the future with its approach to this year’s deadline.
The addition of Paredes, who is controllable through the end of the 2027 season, doesn’t necessarily go against that stated ethos. The same can be said for the club’s acquisition of Blue Jays reliever Nate Pearson, who is controlled through the end of the 2026 campaign. It appears the Cubs may be interested in adding pieces that aren’t set to remain with the club long-term, however, as Jon Heyman of the New York Post suggested this afternoon that the Cubs are among the teams showing interest in Giants lefty Blake Snell. The reigning NL Cy Young award winner got off to a rough start this year but has begun to right the ship in recent weeks, leading The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal to suggest yesterday that teams view Snell as likely to opt out of the remainder of his contract at season’s end.
That reported interest in Snell is somewhat surprising, particularly given the fact that the Cubs have seemingly been fielding interest on veteran right-hander Jameson Taillon in recent weeks. The starting rotation has been an undeniable strength for the Cubs this year, as their 3.72 rotation ERA ranks 6th in the majors thanks primarily to elite performances from Taillon, Justin Steele, and Shota Imanaga. While adding a pitcher of Snell’s caliber would surely bolster the club’s rotation and could even allow the club to deal Taillon without suffering a short-term dip in production, the fact that clubs seemingly view Snell as more likely than not to head back to free agency this fall seems to directly contradict the club’s stated plan to focus on the future this summer.
Regardless of what the Cubs’ plans are regarding Taillon or a possible pursuit of Snell, Sahadev Sharma of The Athletic reported prior to today’s trade for Paredes that the Cubs are “listening” to offers regarding almost anyone on the roster but are focusing on trying to trade from their bullpen mix. Per Sharma, four relief arms in particularly are most frequently brought up by contenders interested in dealing with the Cubs over the coming days: right-handers Hector Neris, Julian Merryweather, and Mark Leiter Jr. as well as southpaw Drew Smyly. Of the quartet, Sharma suggests that veterans Smyly and Neris are the most likely to move, as each could become a free agent at season’s end.
Neris, who has posted an uneven season with a 3.68 ERA and 4.54 FIP this year, has a $9MM team option in his contract that will convert into a $9MM player option in the event that he reaches either 60 appearances or 45 games finished this year. With 39 appearances and 27 games finished so far this year, both benchmarks are within the realm of possibility, and Sharma suggests that this aspect of his contract “complicates” the possibility of a trade. Smyly, who sports a 2.79 ERA and 4.52 FIP in 38 2/3 innings of work this year, has a much less complicated contractual situation; his contract comes with a $10MM mutual option that is certain to be declined by one side or the other in favor of a $2.5MM buyout.
While Neris and Smyly seem unlikely to command massive returns, The Athletic’s Patrick Mooney, Will Sammon, and Katie Woo recently discussed the hefty price tags that have come with controllable relievers this season. Mooney, Sammon, Woo, and Sharma all believe that the Cubs intend to deal Leiter and Merryweather only if they can leverage that sellers’ market for cost-controlled relief arms, with Sharma noting that the asking price is “high” for Leiter in particular. The 33-year-old’s 4.37 ERA this year is unspectacular, but his massive 34.5% strikeout rate, a sparkling 2.18 FIP, and the fact that he can be controlled through the end of the 2026 season all could make him a very appealing addition for contenders in search of relief help. As for Merryweather, the 32-year-old has been injured much of this year but is now healthy, sports a 3.33 ERA and 3.44 FIP since joining the Cubs prior to the 2023 campaign, and comes with the same two additional season of club control that Leiter does.
Another consideration for the Cubs, whether they’re adding or subtracting from the current roster, figures to be the luxury tax. Chicago currently sports a luxury tax payroll of just under $234MM according to RosterResource, a figure that puts them a little more than $3MM under the first threshold of the luxury tax. The addition of a player with a hefty salary like Snell would surely put them well beyond that threshold, while dealing a player like Taillon or even a less expensive relief arm like Neris or Smyly would likely offer the Cubs additional breathing room below the tax threshold. Given the fact that Cubs chairman Tom Ricketts suggested back in February that the “natural” place for the club’s payroll to land was right up against the tax threshold, it would be something of a shock for ownership to greenlight spending beyond the luxury tax in a year where the club evidently is not expecting to make the postseason.
NYCityRiddler
Yawn. Rumors, where’s the rumors?! Ahahaha!
Paleobros
Elvis is still alive
Lance Armstrong was doping
The White Sox threw the World Series
There ya go!
yeasties
almost a haiku!
NYCityRiddler
These are ALL facts. Rumors, where’s the rumors? Ahahaha!
case
The Astros are running a basement meth lab and using the proceeds to bribe umpires.
kidbryant
A trash can meth lab?
Oldguy58
Which one is wrong?
Unclemike1525
I would normally say by all means trade Smyly, Leiter Jr. and Neris as that money is already spent and I’d eat some of it to get something back. But since Little is out for the year and Leiter Jr. and Smyly are the reliable options to get LH bats out that leaves a problem. Since the Cubs let Panone and Escobar walk, Now there is no real option at Iowa to bring up. As for Snell that would be really dumb. Keep Tallion, Let the Giants keep Snell and Chicago will be all the merrier for it.
Unclemike1525
If Jed’s trading Smyly and Leiter he needs to make another deal for a proven ML Lefty. And probably a cheap one if he wants to stay under the Tax.
NicoHoerndawg
Leiter Jr is getting $1.5m on the season. Why are you advocating that trading him away and saving 500k is what the cubs should do? They won’t get much for him. His value as a reliever over the next 2 years with the cubs is way better than anything they’d get in return for him.
Unclemike1525
I’m not trading them. The Cubs are talking about it not me. I’m the one saying hey we have had the best Bullpen in the NL for the last month WITHOUT a Closer. I say we keep them and see if they are any good. Hoyer is the one who’ philosophy is he can find a good bullpen anywhere. Him,Not me.
kcmark
The Cubs have a $234M payroll? With that record? Someone should get fired.
junior25
They spent all their money in the wrong place by signing Belli and Hendricks
Thats $40 mill they couldve used for the BP
They should be trading 30yr old Happ and his 20mill a yr contaract also.
Fred K. Burke
The Cubs also have close to 15 million in what I’ll call “dead money”. That is paying Mancini, Barnhart and most recently Gomes.
Unclemike1525
Exactly Right. Take the 15 million in dead money, add in 10 million for Heyward and Bote, 16 million for Hendricks and you’re up to 41 million plus Gomes remaining money. I don’t blame him for Gomes as that was a reasonable gamble based on past performance that nobody saw coming. Then you get to Bellinger but that’s money that’s more wasted in 2025 and 2026 maybe, Remains to be seen. 1 year fine, 3? Bad move. Now he’s talking Snell and he’s got a 32 million opt in for next year that I wouldn’t want any part of. But that’s Jeds MO. He’s made 2 nice moves and instead of being happy he’s getting antsy. But he’s, 2 steps forward 3 steps backwards. The next 2 days are going to be nerve racking. Snell only makes sense if he’s moving Bellinger to the Giants. I don’t see that happening in a blue moon.
Bucket Number Six
Heyward doesn’t factor into the CBT calc no longer.
rondon
The Snell thing is just speculation. They’d be nuts to do that.
Chad Dare
Let’s keep things in perspective.
Hendricks was signed to a 5-year deal for $70 million before the 2020 season. After averaging 3.2 WAR in the 6 previous seasons.
If Hoyer DID NOT re-sign Belli this year then everyone would have lost their mind.
My complaint is 7 years $177 million for Dansby Swanson when the Cubs already had a very good shortstop in Nico Hoernet.
That 25 million could have been more useful in other areas.
I also question the deals for Ian Happ (20 million per year) and Seiya Suzuki (17 million).
Combine all three deals and you are spending $62 million for 40 homers and 140 RBIs.
That’s a lot of money for very little production.
Unclemike1525
OK lets put things in perspective. Hendricks deal was a club option for this year which the Cubs stupidly picked up. If they wanted him back they should have declined his option and signed him to a cheaper deal. I agree that I didn’t understand either the money or length of the Swanson and Bellinger deals. Bellinger this year-Fine. If he was only signed for this year they could probably move him by Tue and saved at least some of that money. Now they have a problem. With all the SS’s in the system why they needed a 7 year deal for one is a mystery. I said at the time if anyone remembers that they should have offered Happ A QO and let him walk. They doubled down and not only gave him money but a NMC. Dumb. Suzuki I didn’t get but it was obvious they were trying to target Japanese players so they probably figured it would help. Did it work? Jury is still out. If they can pull off Sasaki maybe. I think they were shooting for bigger game in Yammamoto and Ohtani but we’ll never really know. Still one or the other would have been fine. We didn’t need both. A lot of mistakes for a lot of money if you want to be a Tax team. And there’s nothing wrong with that, If you’re smart.
drasco036
Happ and Suzuki have both been well worth their money (although Suzukis defense at times will have you screaming).
There are two schools of thought, there is the group who think you pay stars mega contracts (that’s me, I’d rather spend 40 million a season on Judge than 40 million on Happ and Suzuki) and their is the group who thinks you spread out the money on mediocre talent (that’s Hoyer, spend on two players).
Me thought is right now, we can find a guy for cheap, probably in our system who can hit .240/.320/.400 15 home runs 60-70 runs driven in. It’s a lot more difficult to find .280/.400/.500 35 home runs and 120 driven in. So pay for the elite production, not the slightly better than average production.
The playing it safe, if player A goes down you still have player B doesn’t really appeal to me but that’s where a lot of GMs and fans live.
With that said, there are a lot of Cub fans who complain about Happ making 20 million but it’s typically the same fans who support the more cautious approach of spreading money around for good but not great players. I personally think the only time you spend on “good” players is when you’ve developed great players and the good players finish off the roster.
Unclemike1525
That’s a fine sentiment. But the Cubs want to be a Tax Team. Like it or not, That’s where they want to live. So If the Tax is 241 million how many 40 million dollar players can you have when realistically you need to have about 32 guys (Because you need 9 or so SP’s) Because of the way they go down? Everybody would like 40 million dollar players., But then eventually you turn into the Yankees and the Cubs don’t want to be in that world you live in. The Cubs were supposed to turn into the Rays, Good farm system pipeline when guys turned 30 trade them and move and go next. That was immediately blown up by Hoyer who decided he wanted to play both sides of the street. FA’s and screw the kids. So now they’re in Limbo. Half and Half. After making 2 good moves( Yeah I said it), Right away he starts talking about Snell. Egads
drasco036
The Cubs would be spending the same amount of money but it would give the prospects more of an opportunity. Not sure how you’re not following what I was saying but it would be like Soto and Caissie vs Happ and Suzuki. Signing a guy like Seager instead of Swanson and not bothering with guys like Mancini.
The way the Cubs have been operating is paying for good players which forces them to develop impact players (and they haven’t developed them). My opinion is you pay for impact players, not just good players unless they are the difference between a World Series or not.
iml12
20 blown saves this year. Had they addressed the bullpen and third base in the off-season they wouldn’t be in this position. I do like the Paredes trade, I just wish they did it in January. Last year I was rooting for them to buy buy buy and they did very little. This year I thought they should sell sell sell and they add the best bat at the deadline. Bizarro world. Hoyer has to be getting close to the hot seat.
Blackpink in the area
Yeah I think all the teams in the NL central are really similar in talent but nobody has that kind of payroll.
capone14
Trading for players the cubs traded away to begin with .
One could almost make a better team today then the cubs have just by the players the cubs traded
Bucket Number Six
Make that team, Capone!
rememberthecoop
Jed Hpyer is acting bipolar with acquisitions focused on the next couple of years of control, yet trying to move good relievers and a very solid starter (Taillon) who also have years of control left. And what’s with the interest in Snell? That has to be wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time a rumor was false. Take your medication, Jed.
CNichols
If they trade Taillon then I think it’s 100% fair to criticize them for not picking a consistent strategy. As of now they’ve been buying pieces for 25/26, so what they’re doing makes sense until they trade off long term assets.
I’m betting that Snell rumor is nothing too and guessing they will just ship out the rentals (Nerris/Smyly) while holding on to the pitchers with control.
Dogbone
I tend to agree with you CNic.
Only thing that I wonder about though, is if their ability to pick up Paredes now – caught them by surprise?? If so, would that change their expectations?
But I too don’t expect any moves of consequence in the next few days by the Cubs.
Simm
Someone forgot to tell Jed the season is over.
Bucket Number Six
It probably is. This is about next year.
Simm
Then why would they have interest in snell? He is going to opt out after this season.
Bucket Number Six
Heyman just committing arson here.
Cmurphy
They could always make a deal contingent on a negotiating window to ensure 2025.
But I think the interest in Snell is absurd given the state of this team.
Atlanta Jack
At least Jed is doing something. Couple days away from the chairman being nominated for MLB Hall of Shame.
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Trade Neris and Smyly even though you may need to pay down three contracts. Make Leiter the temporary closer and sign an upgrade in the off-season. Test Alzolay in September to see if his downturn was injury related or not.
Keep Taillon unless offered a great deal. Pass on Snell. Trade Happ only if a great offer (hint: there won’t be). Do NOT trade Hoerner or Suzuki.
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Forgot to add: do not trade Steele under any circumstance.
Unclemike1525
Hey Manny, Just out of curiosity, How many times do you have to be told that Happ has a FULL NMC? And if he doesn’t wanna go, He’s not gonna go.
MLB Top 100 Commenter
“NMC”? Try “NTC”. And less prune juice.
SI says Happ is a trade target even with his “no trade clause”, Note that SI posted this after the Austin Hays deal, not before. Players evaluate each opportunity when the time arises. So, I think it is very unlikely that Happ will be dealt, but it still is a small possibility.
si.com/mlb/cubs/news/chicago-cubs-outfielder-named….
MLB Top 100 Commenter
Just to clarify, the no-movement-clause versus no-trade-clause, here is a distinction without a difference, only pertinent if the Cubs were considering waiving Happ, like the Fish with Bell.
mad1
Bottom line, the cubs have a really crappy front office
Scott Kliesen
This screams of a deal made by a GM who is doing what’s best for his job security more than the organization’s best interest.
johnrealtime
To me it looks like a no brainier deal on the cubs side. Parades > Morel (and I like Morel) and the prospects are very minor
Not only does it improve 2025 cubs, it helps them in case they get hot and fight for the wild card slot (against all odds)
H.Lime
Taillon Steele goodbye.
This one belongs to the Reds
“We have a plan for the deadline. Thank you.”