1. Introduction
The primary purpose of a Faraday cage is to mitigate the influence of electromagnetic radiation and reduce noise, making it a crucial component in electromagnetic compatibility testing models. However, when alternating layers of conductive and non-conductive materials are employed to create periodic structures, intriguing anomalies manifest in the measurements obtained using various instruments [
1,
2].
Interleaving structures involve the alternation of distinct conductive and insulating layers in a well-defined pattern. Such configurations are commonly found in multilayered printed circuit boards, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS), and integrated circuits, among other applications [
3,
4]. Conventionally, capacitance between conductive elements separated by an insulating layer can be predicted using standard equations, primarily based on geometric factors and material properties. However, recent investigations have revealed deviations from these predictions, sparking a quest to comprehend the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed anomalies [
5].
The analysis of frequency-dependent capacitance measurements in layered structures has been the focus of several studies. In [
6], an analysis is presented based on equilibrium dynamical fluctuations of electrode charge in constant-potential molecular simulations. This study extends a fluctuation–dissipation relation for capacitance, particularly in the low-frequency limit. The work provides an illustration using water–gold nanocapacitors. Another contribution, found in [
7], demonstrates the spectral dependence based on the material composition of the structure, employing impedance spectroscopy methods.
Furthermore, in [
8], additional insights are provided via a review of planar magnetics and structures designed to reduce parasitic elements and enhance efficiency. This review encompasses various strategies and technologies aimed at optimizing the performance of layered structures in terms of capacitance and overall electrical characteristics.
These works collectively contribute to the understanding of frequency-dependent capacitance in layered structures, offering valuable insights into material-dependent behaviors and potential enhancements in efficiency.
Figure 1 illustrates a notable example of this variability, where the measured capacitance deviated from the design value (Co = 10.1936 nF). The observed fluctuations exceeded the uncertainty intervals of the means, specifically fluctuating between −0.18% and +0.18% of the specified value (i.e., ranging from 10.1758 to 10.2117 nF). In this experiment, the applied signal was 1 Vac, and the frequency was 100 Hz. The uncertainty limits given by Fischer LSD intervals are also represented.
The capacitance at 100 Hz was 10.1936 nF with standard deviation σ
1 = 0.001654 nF, whereas at 10 kHz, it was 10.0766 nF and σ
2 = 0.000123 nF, and the capacitance changes occurred immediately after changing the frequency. But these kinds of responses were not the same when the capacitor was tested inside the box during the three preceding weeks at 10 kHz, and it was shown that capacitance ranged between 10.0745 nF and 10.0770 nF (see also Figure 9a in [
5]). After that, the capacitance was extracted from the cage and measured at 100 Hz (see the left-hand side of the highlighted region): it is apparent that the capacitance did not change immediately to 10.1936 nF and reached values lower than 10.1400 nF despite being measured at 100 Hz. This value was very much below its actual value of 10.1936 nF (at 100 Hz). It clearly shows not only that the capacitor had reached even lower values than 10.14 nF (when working a 10 kHz) but that after its extraction, it was slowly rising to its actual value of 10.1936 nF.
In other words, the capacitor remained in this situation of lower capacitance despite being extracted from the enclosure (at a frequency of 100 Hz) but was returning slowly to values closer to its actual design value. Afterward, when placed inside the box, it experienced oscillations as shown in the highlighted region, and later, after its subsequent extraction from the box, it returned slowly to its design value and remained stable for weeks. Moreover, the confidence level of de means was ±0.002 nF in the first- and second-time intervals, whereas it increased to ±0.004 nF in the third interval.
In addition, it was found that the above-referred changes sometimes correlated (although moderately) with space weather indices, namely (i) the geomagnetic activity, GMA, which is, in turn, quantified using the parameter Dcx, and/or (ii) with the cosmic ray activity (CRA), which was captured using the cosmic ray induced neutron (CRN) count data (defined as N). Since there was no model for explaining those results, it was first intended to find some order in the puzzling results: for this purpose, and as a first step, we tried to find out the circumstances under which those variations were correlated with the independent variables GMA and/or with CRA.
Later, using a toy model, it was considered that the relative humidity (RH) should not be underestimated [
9,
10,
11]. Thus, based on this observation, we added as a new variable the relative humidity, but the one measured inside the box and nearby the device under test (DUT). This procedure was applied in a recent work about the response of a coil inside one of those periodic structures [
12]. By this means, the inductance of a coil turned out to be correlated with two variables, namely temperature T and RH, with a correlation coefficient of 95%. This result raised the question of whether low humidity values (less than 60%) could determine the value of the inductance, and whether it had to be also considered in the case of a capacitor.
Consequently, it turned out to be necessary to modify the experimental setup and to repeat some previous capacitance measurements by adding measurements of both temperature T and relative humidity RH just beside the DUT.
This repetition of the experiment was also intended to answer some questions such as (a) if these results would be similar if the structure of the box changed and (b) if the capacitance would experience similar variations if the dielectric of the capacitor was replaced by a vacuum tube. With respect to question (a), this work shows the results of measurements carried out in the period April–September 2020, which show that capacitance variations could also be detected within a cage with a different structure and that they were also correlated with space weather factors. As the first relevant result, it is obtained that the spectra, inside and outside the Faraday box, are quite different.
Furthermore, as a complement to the previous experiment, the response of a photomultiplier (PMT) was also tested.
Finally, since the discovery of radioactivity, there has always been a keen interest in the possibility of altering nuclear decay processes and in the search for natural or artificial mechanisms that could bring about such changes. Over the past century, potential factors responsible for introducing variations and perturbations in the measurement of nuclear decay rates have been repeatedly scrutinized [
13,
14,
15]. This research originated from the analysis of decay rate measurements of various nuclides using a Geiger–Müller counter tube within a modified Faraday cage (MFC). This MFC, resembling a typical Faraday cage, featured modifications on all sides via the addition of alternating metal and organic material sheets [
1].
In recent studies, works such as [
16,
17,
18] have delved into examining the use of machine learning methods, the predictive behavior of the influence exerted by active devices, and organic compounds on the measurement of physical variables. These investigations aim to elucidate the impact of active devices and organic compounds on the accuracy and reliability of physical measurements, shedding light on potential correlations and providing valuable insights into the interaction dynamics between these elements and the measured variables. The exploration of these relationships contributes to a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms, fostering advancements in the field of physical measurements and sensor technologies [
19,
20].
The observed unusual results raised questions about the potential impact on the circuitry of nuclear instrumentation when measuring within such a structure and the need for a comprehensive explanation.
The main novelty of this study lies in its detailed experimental approach to capacitance fluctuations in devices located within an interleaving structure. Specifically, it examines the behavior of capacitance between the anode and cathode of a photomultiplier, comparing it with the characteristics of the previously analyzed ultra-stable capacitor. The results reveal significant differences in the spectrum and mean capacitance values inside and outside the enclosure, providing a deeper understanding of how the environment affects these measurements. This experimental approach and the derived conclusions contribute to the overall understanding of capacitance fluctuations in various contexts.
The work has been organized as follows:
Section 2 presents the materials and methods used in the research.
Section 3 presents the obtained results from the experiments carried out, and
Section 4 shows a discussion of the experimental results. Finally, the conclusions of the work are presented in
Section 5.
2. Materials and Methods: Capacitance Variability Reproducibility
The procedures used in the experiments presented in this work are the same as in the previous papers [
5,
12], but different enclosures were used, as well as the locations where T and RH were measured. The experiment with the 10 nF capacitance (E.I) was performed using three boxes: one 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 m
3 external MFC built with four alternating layers of aluminum and self-adhesive elastomeric material. Inside this cage, a second box was placed, built with galvanized steel and cork sheeting, and inside this second box, a third one was used.
The latter was a carton box surrounded by a metallic grid. The capacitor was placed in the center of this structure to avoid inductances between them and the metallic components of the enclosure. The aim of this change in the number of shields was to check whether such enclosures would cause significant variations in the measurements. In addition, the experiment was carried out at a time of minimum solar activity, as was the case in the summer of 2020. The results are presented in
Section 3.
In the experiment with the photomultiplier (E.II), only one cage of 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 m3 dimensions and four alternating layers of aluminum and cork sheeting was used.
The experiments with the vacuum (E.III) tubes were carried out only with the external box used in (E.I), and the temperature and RH sensors were placed near the DUT.
As a means of analyzing spectral patterns, this work proposes the use of the periodogram. The periodogram is a fundamental tool in the analysis of signals and time series. Next, we will explore how the periodogram can be used in this context.
The tests were conducted with temperatures ranging between 27.1 and 30.9 degrees Celsius [
12].
The measurements on the photomultiplier tube (PMT) were specifically conducted to analyze its capacitance fluctuations within the interleaving structure. While we acknowledge the primary operational function of a PMT in converting photons into an electrical signal, our focus in this study is directed toward understanding the capacitance behavior of the PMT when placed within the proposed experimental setup.
The choice of the photomultiplier in our research was motivated by its relevance in electronic applications and the potential impact of its capacitance characteristics on overall performance.
Figure 2 depicts the illustration of the modified Faraday cage (
Figure 2a) and the test bench used for conducting the experiments (
Figure 2b). The modified Faraday cage serves as a controlled environment, isolating the devices from external electromagnetic influences. On the other hand, the test bench represents the experimental setup designed to measure and analyze capacitance fluctuations within the devices placed inside the modified Faraday cage.
2.1. Correlations and Periodograms
For finite duration, discrete-time signals
(which represent the signal to be processed), and a sample of length M, the classic method for estimation of the power spectrum is the periodogram. The periodogram is defined by (1) as follows:
where
is the instantaneous frequency of the signal to be processed and
is the amplitude power spectrum of the response times vector. The spectrum-based analysis is used as a supplement to the calculation of spectral entropy [
19,
20,
21,
22].
2.2. Photomultiplier Anode to Cathode Capacitance Variability inside an MFC
In a previous work [
5], it was observed that the spectrum of a Cs-137 source changed when placed inside the box. So, to check the possible variability of the circuitry of a PMT again, capacitance measurements were performed between the cathode and anode of the device. The circuitry consists of a combination of the capacitances of the voltage divisor and the capacitance between the anode and cathode.
The capacitance between the two mentioned electrodes of a commercial PMT, when measured outside and inside the box, can be represented by C
PMT,o and C
PMT,i, respectively. The measurement results obtained both inside (IN) and outside (OUT) are presented in
Figure 3.
The measurements show again that the capacitance changes significantly with time inside the box, but it is very stable outside. In this way, it was shown that one could expect anomalous results when analyzing the spectrum of a sample.
In
Figure 4, the schematic model of the design flux is shown. This outline reflects the structure and key findings of the study on capacitance fluctuations in devices within an interleaving structure, highlighting the comparison between the photomultiplier and the ultra-stable capacitor, as well as the influence of the environment on the measurements.
4. Discussion
In the first experiment corresponding to the capacitance measurements between April and September 2020, it was found, as expected, that there was no correlation between Cp and the other environmental parameters outside the MFC, but correlations were found within it, the highest being the one between Cp and Dcx. However, the change was much smaller than in previous trials. One can hypothesize that these changes were small due to the different setups and to the varying environmental conditions, i.e., much less variability of Dcx, N, different humidity values, and a minimum of solar activity.
Regarding the humidity values, it must be stressed that they were measured outdoors in the lab. These values could be very different from those inside the lab and inside the cage, and thus, its usefulness can be doubted.
Additionally, it was remarkable the change in the distribution of power into frequency components in the periodogram of the capacitance measurements (when inside and outside the MFC).
Since there was noticeable variability in the results, and since RH was not measured inside the box, it was concluded that more experiments are needed to understand the underlying reason behind those differences.
On the other hand, in the second experiment, analysis of the measurements in a photomultiplier inside an MFC was performed, and it could be observed that the capacitance between the anode and the cathode of a photomultiplier behaved similarly to the capacitance of the ultra-stable capacitor analyzed in [
1] when measured inside an interleaving structure. This means that both capacitances fluctuate when placed inside the cavity, but they recover their design values when extracted from the box(es). Some remarkable facts are (a) the capacitances recover their design values not immediately but after a certain time, which can be about 24 h; and (b) the confidence intervals of the means change significantly (in the presented case) from inside to outside the enclosure (in the case of the ultra-stable capacitor, it increased from 0.004 to 0.008 nF).
Regarding the correlations between capacitances CPMT and the other variables, they were found in different circumstances: (a) only between CPMT and Dcx when the jump of CPMT took place and when the jump was included in the analysis, (b) only between CPMT and N when the jump was excluded from the analysis, and (c) a multiple regression analysis yield a slight correlation between CPMT and both Dcx and N.
The variability experienced by different devices like the ultra-stable capacitor and the circuitry of a photomultiplier tube is also verified by different periodograms that are generated inside and outside the cavity.
Regarding the analysis of asymmetry, the results presented in
Table 2 illustrate the following patterns: Within the enclosure, the negative skewness value (−2.2168) indicates that the left tail of the distribution is longer or heavier compared to the right tail. Conversely, outside the enclosure, the positive value (2.1978) suggests that the right tail of the distribution is longer or heavier than the left tail. This asymmetry can provide relevant information about the structure of the data under analysis, and periodogram analysis can aid in identifying and better understanding the characteristics and frequency components present in the data.