skip to main content
article
Free access

An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction

Published: 01 March 1986 Publication History

Abstract

"User involvement" in information system development is generally considered an important mechanism for improving system quality and ensuring successful system implementation. The common assumption that user involvement leads to system usage and/or information satisfaction is examined in a survey of 200 production managers. Alternative models exploring the causal ordering of the three variables are developed and tested via path analysis. The results demonstrate that user involvement in the development of information systems will enhance both system usage and the user's satisfaction with the system. Further, the study provides evidence that the user's satisfaction with the system will lead to greater system usage.

References

[1]
Alter. S., Development patterns for decision support systems. MIS Q. 2, 3 (Sept. 1978). 33-42.
[2]
Bailey, I.E. and Pearson, S.W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Manage. Sci. 29, 6 (May 1983), 519-529.
[3]
Barrett, G.V., Thornton, C.L., and Cahe, P.A. Human factors evaluation of computer-based information storage and retrieval systems. Hum. Factors 10, (1966), 431-436.
[4]
Billings, R., and Wroten, S. Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: Criticisms and suggestions. I. Appl. Psycho/. 63. 6 (1978), 677-688.
[5]
Bostrom. R.P., and Heinen, J.S. MIS problems and failures: A sociotechnical perspective. MIS (2. I, 3, Part I. (Sept. 1977), 17-32; MIS Q. 1, 4, Part II, (Dec. 1977), 11-28.
[6]
Davis. G.B. Managemenf Information Sysfems: Concepkial Foundarions, Sfructure, and DeuelopmenL McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974.
[7]
Edstrom. A. User inlluence and the success of MIS projects. Hum. Relat. 30. (1977), 589-606.
[8]
Fishhein, M., anti Ajzen. I. Belief Atfifude, Infention and Behavior; An Introducfion to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.
[9]
Franz, C.R. Organizational factors affecting user involvement in information systems design. Unpublished Working Paper, Univ. of Sooth Carolina, Colombia, Nov. 1!379.
[10]
Gallagher, CA. Perceptions of the value of a management information system. Acad. Manage. J 17, 1, (19741, 46-55.
[11]
Ginzberg. M.J. Participative systems design. In Design and Zmplementarion of Comparer Based Information Systems. N. Szyperski and E. Grochla, Eds. Sijthoff and Nordhoff, Germantown, 1979.
[12]
Guthrie. A. A Survey of Canadian Middle Managers' Attitudes Toward Management Informafiorr Systems. Carleton Univ., Ottawa, Ontario, Dec. 1972.
[13]
Heise, D.R. Problems in path analysis and causal inference. In Sociological Methodology, B.F. Borgatta, Ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, Calif., 1969.
[14]
Igersheim, R.H. Management response to an information system. In AFlPS Conference Proceedings, National Computer Conference, 1976, pp. 877-882.
[15]
Ives, B., and Olson, M. User involvement and MIS success: A review of research. Manage. Sci. 30, 5 (May 19841, 586-603.
[16]
Ives, B., Olson, M., and Baroudi. J. Measuring user information satisfaction: A method and critique. Commun. ACM 26, 10 (Oct. 19831, 785-793.
[17]
Kaiser. K.M., and Srinivasan, A. The relationship of user attitudes toward design criteria and information systems success. In Proceedings of fhe National AIDS Conference, (Nov. 1980), pp. 201-203.
[18]
Kenny, D.A. Correlafion and Causality. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1979.
[19]
King, W.R. and Rodriguez, J.I. Evaluating MIS. MIS Q. 2, 3 (Sept. 1978). 43-52.
[20]
King, W.R., and Rodriguez, J.I. Participative design of strategic decision support systems: An empirical assessment. Manage. Sci. 27, 6 (June 1981). 717-726.
[21]
Kling, R. The organizational contwt of user-centered software design. MIS Q. I, 4 (Dec. 1977). 41-5;!.
[22]
Locke, E.A., and Schweiger. D. Participation in decision making: One more look. In Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. I, B. Staw, Ed. JAI Press, Greenwich, Corm. 1979. pp. 265-339.
[23]
Lonnstedt. L. Factors related to the implementation of operations research solutions. Interfaces 5, 2 (1975), 23-30.
[24]
Lucas. H.C., Jr. Toward Creative Systems Design. Columbia University Press, New York, 1974.
[25]
Lucas, H.C., Jr. Wily Information Systems Fail. Colombia University Press, New York, 1975.
[26]
Lucas, H.C., Jr. The Implemenfation of Computer-Based Models. National Association of Accountants. New York, 1976.
[27]
Lucas, H.C. Jr. The use of an interactive information storage and retrieval system in medical research. Commun. ACM 21, 3 (1978), 197-205.
[28]
Maish, A.M. A user's behavior toward his MIS. MIS Q. 3, 1 (Mar. 1979). 39-52.
[29]
Mumford, E. and Sackman. H. International human choice and computers: Conference retrospect and prospect. In Human Choice and Compufers. E. Mumford and H. Sackman. Eds., North-Holland. Amsterdam, 1975.
[30]
Pearson, S. Measurement of computer user satisfaction. Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University. Tempe, 1977.
[31]
Powers, R.F., and Dickson, G.W. MIS project management: Myths, opinions, and reality. Califortiia Manage. Rev. 15, 3 (Spring 1973). 147-156.
[32]
Rohey. D. and Farrow, D. Information system development: Some dynamics of user involvement. In Proceedings of the National AIDS Conference. (Nov. 1979). pp. 149-151.
[33]
Sartore, A. Implementing a management information system: The relationship of participation, knowledge, performance, and satisfaction in an academic environment. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Irvine, 1976.
[34]
Schewe. C.D. The MIS user: An exploratory behavioral analysis. Acad. Manage. J. 19,4 (Dec. 1976). 577-590.
[35]
Spence. J.O. A case study analysis of organizational communication effectiveness between user-managers and information service department personnel. Ph.D. dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lobbock, 1978.
[36]
Stumpf, S., and Hartman, K. Individual exploration to organzational committment or withdrawal. Acad. Manage. J. 27, 2 (June 1984), 308-329.
[37]
Swanson, E.B. Management information systems: Appreciation and involvement. Manage. Sci. 21. (1974), 178-188.
[38]
Zand, D., and Sorenson, R. Theory of change and the effective use of management science. Admin. Sci. Q. 20, (Dec. 1975). 532-545.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Reviews

John M. Hammer

User involvement during system design could conceivably cause improved user satisfaction, system utilization, or both. In addition, satisfaction could cause improved utilization, or vice versa. The causal connection between these three is examined via a survey. It was found that involvement caused increased satisfaction and utilization, and in addition that satisfaction caused increased usage.

Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 29, Issue 3
The MIT Press scientific computation series
March 1986
71 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/5666
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 March 1986
Published in CACM Volume 29, Issue 3

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)459
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)94
Reflects downloads up to 24 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media