skip to main content
10.1145/3679318.3685394acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The Process is Under Control! Understanding the Building Blocks of User Experience in Operator Work

Published: 13 October 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Our everyday working life is an experience rich. The multifaceted nature of operator experiences in process control activity is a critical yet underexplored domain. We aim to study the rich tapestry of emotions and experiences that operators encounter, ranging from triumphant problem-solving to the intense pressure of emergency situations. However, these experiences that provide opportunities for learning and growth, and make the work rich in content have not been fully utilized in system design so far. By examining multiple case studies within the oil refining and the paper and pulp industries, this paper seeks to illuminate the nuanced ways in which these experiences can inform and enhance system design. Our goal is to harness these insights to foster the development of advanced, sustainable process control systems that are attuned to the real-world experiences of operators. Thus, the paper contributes to laying a better basis for experience-driven design of process control systems.

References

[1]
Lisanne Bainbridge, 1983. Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 6: 775-779.
[2]
Javier A Bargas-avila and Kasper Hornbæk. 2011. Old Wine in New Bottles or Novel Challenges? A Critical Analysis of Empirical Studies of User Experience.
[3]
Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. In Notes Towards an Ethnography, A. Blythe, M. and Monk (ed.). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
[4]
Kenneth Bibby, Frederivk Margulies, Jan Rijndorp and Robert Withers. 1975. Man's role in control system. In Proceedings of 6th IFAC Congress, Boston.
[5]
Ronald Boring, Thomas Ulrich, Jefry Joe and Roger. Lew. 2015. Guideline for Operational Nuclear Usability and Knowledge Elicitation (GONUKE). In Proceedings of Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2015).
[6]
Ronald Boring, Thomas Ulrich and Roger Lew. 2021. Putting Gonuke into Practice: Considerations for Human Factors Evaluations. In Proceedings of the 2021 HFES 65th International Annual Meeting, 618–622.
[7]
Guy Boy. 2021. Design for Flexibility: A Human Systems Integration Approach (Human–Computer Interaction Series). Springer.
[8]
Hao Cai, Egon Toft, Ole Hejlesen, and John Hansen. 2015. Health professionals user experience of the intelligent bed in patients’ homes. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 31, 4: 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462315000380
[9]
Doug Elliott, Sharon McKinley, and Lin Perry, Cristine Duffield, Rick Ledema, Robyn Gallagher, Margaret Fry, Michael Roche and Emily Allen. 2014. Clinical utility of an observation and response chart with human factors design characteristics and a track and trigger system: study protocol for a two-phase multisite multiple-methods design. In JMIR Research Protocols 2014, 3, 3:e40. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.3300
[10]
Yrjö Engeström. 1999. Activity Theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives in Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 19–38.
[11]
John. C. Flanagan. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psych. Bull. 51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061470
[12]
Nadine Flegel, Jonas Pöhler, Kristof van Laerhoven, and Tilo Mentler. 2022. “I Want My Control Room To Be…”: On the Aesthetics of Interaction in a Safety-Critical Working Environment. In Proceedings of MuC '22: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022. 488–492. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543758.3547562
[13]
Tobias Grundgeiger, Jörn Hurtienne and Oliver Happel. 2019. Why and How to Approach User Experience in Safety-Critical Domains: The Example of Health Care. J. Human Factors 63,5 (August 2021), 821-832. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0018720819887575
[14]
Jasmine Harvey, Anthony J Avery, Ralph Hibberd, and Nicholas Barber. 2014. Meeting user needs in national healthcare systems: lessons from early adopter community pharmacists using the electronic prescriptions service. In BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2014.
[15]
Andreas Holzinger, Markus Baernthaler, Walter Pammer, Herman Katz, Vesna Bjelic-Radisic, and Martina Ziefle. 2011. Investigating paper vs. screen in real-life hospital workflows: Performance contradicts perceived superiority of paper in the user experience. Int. J. Human-Computer studies 69, 9: 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.05.002
[16]
ISO_9241-210. 2010. Human-centred design for interactive systems.
[17]
Eija Kaasinen, Virpi Roto, Jaakko Hakulinen, Tomi Heimonen, Jussi P. P. Jokinen, Hannu Karvonen, Tuuli Keskinen, Hanna Koskinen, Yichen Lu, Pertti Saariluoma, Helena Tokkonen, and Markku Turunen. 2015. Defining user experience goals to guide the design of industrial systems. Behaviour & Information Technology 34, 10: 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1035335
[18]
Kaasinen, E., Anttila, A.-H., Heikkilä, P., Laarni, J., Koskinen, H., & Väätänen, A. 2022. Smooth and Resilient Human–Machine Teamwork as an Industry 5.0 Design Challenge. Sustainability, 14, 5, 2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052773
[19]
Victor Kaptelinin, and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and reflections. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02196-1
[20]
Hannu Karvonen. 2018. User Experience Goals in Human-Centred Design of Safety-Critical Systems. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyväskylä.
[21]
Hannu Karvonen, Hanna Koskinen, and Jaakko Hagren. 2012. Enhancing the User Experience of the Crane Operator: Comparing Work Demands in Two Operational Settings. In Proceedings of the 30st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, 37–44.
[22]
Hanna Koskinen, Hannu Karvonen, and Helena Tokkonen. 2013. User experience targets as design drivers. In Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics - ECCE ’13, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501907.2501956
[23]
Gary A. Klein, Roberta Calderwood and Donald MacGregor. 1989. Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 19, 3, 462-472.
[24]
Mike Kuniavsky. 2008. User experience and HCI. In The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (2nd ed.), A Sears and Jacko JA (eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, 897–916.
[25]
Tiina Kymäläinen, Jaakko Hakulinen, Tomi Heimonen, and Jobin James. 2015. Evaluating a future remote control environment with an experience driven science fiction prototype. https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2015.19
[26]
Aleksei N Leont'ev. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
[27]
Wendy Mackay. 2000. Is Paper Safer? The Role of Paper Flight Strips in Air Traffic Control. 6(4), 311–340.
[28]
Wendy Mackay, A. Fayard., L. Frobert., L. Médini., O. Sud, & O. France. 1998. Reinventing the Familiar: Exploring an Augmented Reality Design Space for Air Traffic Control. In Proceedings of CHI98.
[29]
Petri Mannonen, Maiju Aikala, Hanna Koskinen, and Paula Savioja. 2014. Uncovering the user experience with critical experience interviews. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures the Future of Design - OzCHI ’14: 452– 455. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2686612.2686684
[30]
John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
[31]
Donald .A Norman. 2004. Emotional design. Ubiquity 4, 45.
[32]
Leena Norros. 2004. Acting under Uncertainty: The Core-Task Analysis in Ecological Study of Work. VTT publications 546.
[33]
Leena Norros. 2014. Developing human factors/ergonomics as a design discipline. Applied Ergonomics, 445(1).
[34]
Leena Norros, Paula Savioja, and Hanna Koskinen. 2015. Core-Task Design: A Practice-Theory Approach to Human Factors. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Springer Cham, 8, 2: 1–141. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00631ED1V01Y201502HCI027
[35]
Marianna Obrist, Wolfgang Reitberger, Daniela Wurhofer, Florian Förster, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. User Experience Research in the Semiconductor Factory : A Contradiction ? 144–151.
[36]
Stella Ouma, Marlien Herselman, and Greunen Van Darelle. 2010. Essential UX metrics to be considered when designing m-health applications in order to provide positive user experiences. In IADIS International Conference, 271–274.
[37]
Jarmo Palviainen and Kaisa Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila. 2009. User Experience in Machinery Automation: In Human Centered Design, HCII 2009, 1042–1051.
[38]
Morgan Price, Jens H Weber, Iryna Davies, and Paule Bellwood. 2015. Lead User Design: Medication management in Electronic Medical Records. In MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-enabled Health, 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-237
[39]
Virpi Roto, Effie Law, Arnold Vermeeren, and Jettie Hoonhout. 2011. User Experience White Paper. Outcome of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience. Germany. Retrieved from http://www.allaboutux.org/uxwhitepaper
[40]
Lauren R Russ, Jennifer Phillips, Keely Brzozowicz, Lynne A Chafetz, Paul E Plsek, C Craig Blackmore, and Gary S Kaplan. 2013. Healthcare Experience-based design for integrating the patient care experience into healthcare improvement: Identifying a set of reliable emotion words $. Healthcare 1, 3–4: 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.07.004
[41]
Georg Rückriem. 2003. Tool or a Medium? The Meaning of Information and Telecommunication Technology to Human Practice. A Quest for Systemic Understanding of Activity Theory. In Proceedings of FISCAR ’03.
[42]
Paula Savioja and Leena Norros. 2013. Systems Usability Framework for Evaluating Tools in Safety-Critical work. Cognition, Technology and Work, 15, 3: 1–21.
[43]
Paula Savioja, Marja Liinasuo and Hanna Koskinen. 2013. User experience: Does it matter in complex systems? Cognition, Technology & Work. 16, 4. 429-449.
[44]
Paula Savioja. 2014. Evaluating Systems Usability in Complex Work – Development of a systemic usability concept to benefit control room design. PhD thesis. Aalto University.
[45]
Paul Van Schaik and Jonathan Ling. 2008. Modelling user experience with web sites: Usability, hedonic value, beauty and goodness. Interacting with Computers 20, 3: 419–432.
[46]
Eva Simonsen, Lars-Ola Bligård, and Anna-Leena Osvalder. 2020. Feasibility of methods for early formative control room system evaluation. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 75(December 2019), 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102890
[47]
Sandra Sproll, Matthias Peissner, and Christina Sturm. 2010. From Product Concept to User Experience: Exploring UX Potentials at Early Product Stages. 473–482.
[48]
Lev. S. Vygotsky. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Massachusetts: Harward University Press, Cambridge.
[49]
Astrid Weiss, Roland Buchner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2011. Exploring Human-Robot Cooperation Possibilities for Semiconductor Manufacturing. In International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2011.5928683
[50]
Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores. 1986. Understanding computer and cognition: A new foundation for design.
[51]
David Woods and Erick Hollnagel. 2006. Joint cognitive systems: patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis Group.
[52]
Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2010. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Morgan and Claypool Publishers.
[53]
Daniela Wurhofer, Roland Buchner, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Research in the Semiconductor Factory: Insights into Experiences and Contextual Influences. In Proceedings of International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI.2014.6860461
[54]
Robert K. Yin. The case study crisis: some answers. Admin. Science Q. 26, March: 58–66.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The Process is Under Control! Understanding the Building Blocks of User Experience in Operator Work
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '24: Proceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      October 2024
      1236 pages
      ISBN:9798400709661
      DOI:10.1145/3679318
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 13 October 2024

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Design
      2. Process control work
      3. User experience
      4. User interfaces

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      NordiCHI 2024

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)33
      Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format.

      HTML Format

      Login options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media