research-article

Open access

"Centralized or Decentralized?": Concerns and Value Judgments of Stakeholders in the Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Market

Authors:

Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou,

Xin TongAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Article No.: 28, Pages 1 - 34

https://doi.org/10.1145/3637305

Published: 26 April 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are decentralized digital tokens to represent the unique ownership of items. Recently, NFTs have been gaining popularity and at the same time bringing up issues, such as scams, racism, and sexism. Decentralization, a key attribute of NFT, contributes to some of the issues that are easier to regulate under centralized schemes, which are intentionally left out of the NFT marketplace. In this work, we delved into this centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT space through mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. Centralization-decentralization dilemma is the dilemma caused by the conflict between the slogan of decentralization and the interests of stakeholders. We first analyzed over 30,000 NFT-related tweets to obtain a high-level understanding of stakeholders' concerns in the NFT space. We then interviewed 15 NFT stakeholders (both creators and collectors) to obtain their in-depth insights into these concerns and potential solutions. Our findings identify concerning issues among users: financial scams, counterfeit NFTs, hacking, and unethical NFTs. We further reflected on the centralization-decentralization dilemma drawing upon the perspectives of the stakeholders in the interviews. Finally, we gave some inferences to solve the centralization-decentralization dilemma in the NFT market and thought about the future of NFT and decentralization.

References

[1]

[n. d.]. https://decrypt.co/118438/2022-versus-2021-nft-sales.

[2]

[n. d.]. https://cyberscrilla.com/the-cost-to-create-an-nft.

[3]

[n. d.]. https://news.artnet.com/market/sothebys-is-hosting-its-first-curated-nft-sale-featuring-the-very-first-nft-everminted-1966003.

[4]

[n. d.]. https://www.pymnts.com/nfts/2022/nfts-hit-17b-in-trading-in-2021-up-21000/.

[5]

[n. d.]. https://www.wsj.com/articles/nft-sales-are-flatlining-11651552616.

[6]

[n. d.]. https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dgw9a/racist-meta-slave-nft-project-rebrands-after-being-called-racist.

[7]

[n. d.]. https://nftnow.com/features/nft-marketplaces-are-centralized-and-its-a-real-problem/.

[8]

[n. d.]. https://coinmarketcap.com/alexandria/glossary/rug-pull.

[9]

[n. d.]. https://nonfungible.com/news/corporate/bad-behaviors-nft-blockchain.

[10]

[n. d.]. https://www.protocol.com/newsletters/protocol-fintech/nft-fees?rebelltitem=1#rebelltitem1.

[11]

[n. d.]. https://dappgambl.com/nfts/dead-nfts/.

[12]

Ahmed Aleroud and Lina Zhou. 2017. Phishing environments, techniques, and countermeasures: A survey. Computers & Security 68 (2017), 160--196.

Digital Library

[13]

Ilo Alexandre, Joseph Jai sung Yoo, and Dhiraj Murthy. 2021. Make Tweets Great Again: Who Are Opinion Leaders, and What Did They Tweet About Donald Trump? Social Science Computer Review 40 (2021), 1456 -- 1477.

Digital Library

[14]

Ziqiao Ao, Gergely Horvath, and Luyao Zhang. 2023. Is decentralized finance actually decentralized? A social network analysis of the Aave protocol on the Ethereum blockchain. Technical Report.

[15]

Javier Arroyo, David Davó, Elena Martínez-Vicente, Youssef Faqir-Rhazoui, and Samer Hassan. 2022. DAO-Analyzer: Exploring Activity and Participation in Blockchain Organizations. In Companion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 193--196.

[16]

Nicola Atzei, Massimo Bartoletti, and Tiziana Cimoli. 2017. A survey of attacks on ethereum smart contracts (sok). In International conference on principles of security and trust. Springer, 164--186.

Digital Library

[17]

Marcella Atzori. 2015. Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? Available at SSRN 2709713 (2015).

[18]

Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Bamakan, Nasim Nezhadsistani, Omid Bodaghi, and Qiang Qu. 2022. Patents and intellectual property assets as non-fungible tokens; key technologies and challenges. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022), 1--13.

[19]

Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Amos Cappellaro, and Ylva Fernaeus. 2022. Stakeholders and Value in the NFT Ecosystem: Systems Extended Abstracts. 1--8.

[20]

Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Amos Cappellaro, and Ylva Fernaeus. 2022. Stakeholders and Value in the NFT Ecosystem: Towards a Multi-disciplinary Understanding of the NFT Phenomenon. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519694

Digital Library

[21]

Olivier Boireau. 2018. Securing the blockchain against hackers. Network Security 2018, 1 (2018), 8--11.

[22]

Severin Bonnet and Frank Teuteberg. 2023. Impact of blockchain and distributed ledger technology for the management of the intellectual property life cycle: A multiple case study analysis. Computers in Industry 144 (2023), 103789.

Digital Library

[23]

Vitalik Buterin. 2017. Hard forks, soft forks, defaults and coercion. URL http://web. archive. org/web/20080207010024/http://www. 808multimedia. com/winnt/kernel. htm (2017).

[24]

Simone Casale-Brunet, Mirko Zichichi, Lee Hutchinson, Marco Mattavelli, and Stefano Ferretti. 2022. The impact of NFT profile pictures within social network communities. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good. 283--291.

Digital Library

[25]

Ruth Catlow, Marc Garrett, Nathan Jones, and Sam Skinner. 2017. Artists re: Thinking the blockchain. Vol. 1. Torque editions.

[26]

Dominic Chalmers, Christian Fisch, Russell Matthews, William Quinn, and Jan Recker. 2022. Beyond the bubble: Will NFTs and digital proof of ownership empower creative industry entrepreneurs? Journal of Business Venturing Insights 17 (2022), e00309.

[27]

Dipak Chaudhari, Om P Damani, and Srivatsan Laxman. 2010. Lexical co-occurrence, statistical significance, and word association. arXiv preprint arXiv:1008.5287 (2010).

[28]

K. Chayka. 2021. Why Bored Ape Avatars Are Taking Over Twitter. New Yorker (2021).

[29]

K. Chayka. 2021. Why Bored Ape avatars are taking over Twitter. The New Yorker (2021).

[30]

C. Collins. 2022. How Web3 and NFTs will change social media forever. PR Daily (2022).

[31]

Dipanjan Das, Priyanka Bose, Nicola Ruaro, Christopher Kruegel, and Giovanni Vigna. 2022. Understanding security issues in the NFT ecosystem. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 667--681.

Digital Library

[32]

Primavera De Filippi and Samer Hassan. 2018. Blockchain technology as a regulatory technology: From code is law to law is code. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.02507 (2018).

[33]

Primavera De Filippi, Morshed Mannan, and Wessel Reijers. 2020. Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance. Technology in Society 62 (2020), 101284.

[34]

Nigel Dodd. 2018. The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, culture & society 35, 3 (2018), 35--56.

[35]

A. E. Dr?gnoiu, M. Platt, Z. Wang, and Z. Zhou. 2023. The More You Know: Energy Labelling Enables More Sustainable Cryptocurrency Investment. In Workshop on Fintech and Decentralized Finance.

[36]

Timothy C Earle. 2009. Trust, confidence, and the 2008 global financial crisis. Risk Analysis: An International Journal 29, 6 (2009), 785--792.

[37]

William Entriken, Dieter Shirley, Jacob Evans, and Nastassia Sachs. 2018. Eip-721: Erc-721 non-fungible token standard. Ethereum Improvement Proposals 721 (2018).

[38]

Catherine Flick. 2022. A critical professional ethical analysis of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs). Journal of Responsible Technology 12 (2022), 100054.

[39]

Yihang Fu, Zesen Zhuang, and Luyao Zhang. 2022. AI Ethics on Blockchain: Topic Analysis on Twitter Data for Blockchain Security. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.06951 (2022).

[40]

David Golumbia. 2016. The politics of Bitcoin: Software as right-wing extremism. U of Minnesota Press.

[41]

Stuart Haber and W Scott Stornetta. 1990. How to time-stamp a digital document. In Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptography. Springer, 437--455.

[42]

Lioba Heimbach, Quentin Kneip, Yann Vonlanthen, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2023. DeFi and NFTs Hinder Blockchain Scalability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06708 (2023).

[43]

Sangwon Hong, Yoongdoo Noh, and Chanik Park. 2019. Design of extensible non-fungible token model in hyperledger fabric. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Scalable and Resilient Infrastructures for Distributed Ledgers. 1--2.

Digital Library

[44]

Syed Omer Husain, Alex Franklin, and Dirk Roep. 2020. The political imaginaries of blockchain projects: discerning the expressions of an emerging ecosystem. Sustainability Science 15, 2 (2020), 379--394.

[45]

Moritz Hütten. 2019. The soft spot of hard code: blockchain technology, network governance and pitfalls of technological utopianism. Global Networks 19, 3 (2019), 329--348.

[46]

Steve Kaczynski and Scott Duke Kominers. 2021. How NFTs create value. Harvard Business Review 10 (2021).

[47]

Elie Kapengut and Bruce Mizrach. 2022. An Event Study of the Ethereum Transition to Proof-of-Stake. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13655 (2022).

[48]

Arnav Kapoor, Dipanwita Guhathakurta, Mehul Mathur, Rupanshu Yadav, Manish Gupta, and Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. 2022. Tweetboost: Influence of social media on nft valuation. In Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2022. 621--629.

Digital Library

[49]

Nir Kshetri. 2017. Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? Third World Quarterly 38, 8 (2017), 1710--1732.

[50]

Nir Kshetri. 2022. Scams, Frauds, and Crimes in the Nonfungible Token Market. Computer 55, 4 (2022), 60--64.

[51]

Che-Wei Liu, Peng Huang, and Henry Lucas. 2017. IT centralization, security outsourcing, and cybersecurity breaches: evidence from the US higher education. (2017).

[52]

Yulin Liu, Yuxuan Lu, Kartik Nayak, Fan Zhang, Luyao Zhang, and Yinhong Zhao. 2022. Empirical analysis of eip-1559: Transaction fees, waiting times, and consensus security. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 2099--2113.

Digital Library

[53]

Leslie M Meier and Vincent R Manzerolle. 2019. Rising tides? Data capture, platform accumulation, and new monopolies in the digital music economy. New Media & Society 21, 3 (2019), 543--561.

[54]

Ralph C Merkle. 2019. Protocols for public key cryptosystems. In Secure communications and asymmetric cryptosystems. Routledge, 73--104.

[55]

Jeremy Nguyen. 2022. Racial discrimination in non-fungible token (NFT) prices? CryptoPunk sales and skin tone. Economics Letters (2022), 110727.

[56]

Michael Nofer, Peter Gomber, Oliver Hinz, and Dirk Schiereck. 2017. Blockchain. Business & Information Systems Engineering 59, 3 (2017), 183--187.

[57]

P. Parau, C. Lemnaru, M. Dinsoreanu, and R. Potolea. 2017. Chapter 10 - Opinion Leader Detection. In Sentiment Analysis in Social Networks, Federico Alberto Pozzi, Elisabetta Fersini, Enza Messina, and Bing Liu (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 157--170. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0--12--804412--4.00010--3

[58]

Jin Ho Park and Jong Hyuk Park. 2017. Blockchain security in cloud computing: Use cases, challenges, and solutions. Symmetry 9, 8 (2017), 164.

[59]

PLOTTI2K1. 2012. The role of opinion leaders in interest based communities. https://twitterresearcher.wordpress.com/2012/01/17/the-role-of-opinion-leaders-in-interest-based-communities/

[60]

Wayne Price. 2008. What is Anarchist Communism? The Anarchist Library (2008).

[61]

Yiannis Psaras and David Dias. 2020. The interplanetary file system and the filecoin network. In 2020 50th Annual IEEE-IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks-Supplemental Volume (DSN-S). IEEE, 80--80.

[62]

Kaihua Qin, Liyi Zhou, Yaroslav Afonin, Ludovico Lazzaretti, and Arthur Gervais. 2021. CeFi vs. DeFi--Comparing Centralized to Decentralized Finance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08157 (2021).

[63]

Yutong Quan, Xintong Wu, Wanlin Deng, and Luyao Zhang. 2023. Decoding Social Sentiment in DAO: A Comparative Analysis of Blockchain Governance Communities. Technical Report. Center for Open Science.

[64]

Wajiha Rehman, Hijab e Zainab, Jaweria Imran, and Narmeen Zakaria Bawany. 2021. Nfts: Applications and challenges. In 2021 22nd International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT). IEEE, 1--7.

[65]

Corina Sas and Irni Eliana Khairuddin. 2015. Exploring trust in Bitcoin technology: a framework for HCI research. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction. 338--342.

Digital Library

[66]

N Schneider. 2017. What to do once you admit that decentralizing everything never seems to work. Mediu.-Hackernoon. http s://hacke rnoon. com/decen trali zing-every thing-never-seems-towork-2bb04 61bd1 68 (2017).

[67]

Caspar Schwarz-Schilling, Joachim Neu, Barnabé Monnot, Aditya Asgaonkar, Ertem Nusret Tas, and David Tse. 2022. Three attacks on proof-of-stake ethereum. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 560--576.

Digital Library

[68]

Sofya A Semenkovich and Olga A Tsukanova. 2019. On the algorithms of identifying opinion leaders in social networks. Procedia Computer Science 162 (2019), 778--785.

Digital Library

[69]

Tanusree Sharma, Zhixuan Zhou, Yun Huang, and Yang Wang. 2022. " It's A Blessing and A Curse": Unpacking Creators' Practices with Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Their Communities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.13233 (2022).

[70]

Tanusree Sharma, Zhixuan Zhou, Andrew Miller, and Yang Wang. 2022. Exploring Security Practices of Smart Contract Developers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11193 (2022).

[71]

Mark Steyvers and Tom Griffiths. 2007. Probabilistic topic models. In Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Psychology Press, 439--460.

[72]

Yutong Sun, Yutong Quan, Jiaxun Cao, and Xin Tong. [n. d.]. On the Mechanics of NFT Valuation: AI Ethics and Social Media. ([n. d.]).

[73]

Yong Tang, Jason Xiong, Rafael Becerril-Arreola, and Lakshmi Iyer. 2019. Ethics of blockchain: a framework of technology, applications, impacts, and research directions. Information Technology & People (2019).

[74]

Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott. 2016. Blockchain revolution: how the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Penguin.

Digital Library

[75]

James Tarmy and Olga Kharif. 2021. Beeple NFT everydays sells at Christies auction for 69 million in ether. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-03--11/beeple-everydays-nft-sells-at-art-auction-for-60-million-paid-in-ether

[76]

Abbas Tashakkori and John W Creswell. 2007. The new era of mixed methods., 3--7 pages.

[77]

Qin Wang, Rujia Li, Qi Wang, and Shiping Chen. 2021. Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447 (2021).

[78]

Shuai Wang, Wenwen Ding, Juanjuan Li, Yong Yuan, Liwei Ouyang, and Fei-Yue Wang. 2019. Decentralized autonomous organizations: Concept, model, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 6, 5 (2019), 870--878.

[79]

Shuai Wang, Yong Yuan, Xiao Wang, Juanjuan Li, Rui Qin, and Fei-Yue Wang. 2018. An overview of smart contract: architecture, applications, and future trends. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 108--113.

Digital Library

[80]

Amy Whitaker. 2019. Art and Blockchain: A Primer, History, and Taxonomy of Blockchain Use Cases in the Arts. Artivate 8, 2 (2019), 21--46. https://doi.org/10.1353/artv.2019.0008

[81]

Gavin Wood et al. 2014. Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum project yellow paper 151, 2014 (2014), 1--32.

[82]

Yunpeng Xiao, Bufan Deng, Siqi Chen, Kyrie Zhixuan Zhou, RAY LC, Luyao Zhang, and Xin Tong. 2023. Replication Data for: ?Centralized or Decentralized?": Concerns and Value Judgments of Stakeholders in the Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Market. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GLFUPA

[83]

Anatoly Yakovenko. 2018. Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain v0. 8.13. Whitepaper (2018).

[84]

Luyao Zhang. 2023. Machine Learning for Blockchain: Literature Review and Open Research Questions. In NeurIPS 2023 AI for Science Workshop.

[85]

Luyao Zhang, Xinshi Ma, and Yulin Liu. 2022. SoK: Blockchain Decentralization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.04256 (2022).

[86]

Luyao Zhang, Yutong Sun, Yutong Quan, Jiaxun Cao, and Xin Tong. 2023. On the Mechanics of NFT Valuation: AI Ethics and Social Media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.10201 (2023).

[87]

Luyao Zhang and Fan Zhang. 2023. Understand Waiting Time in Transaction Fee Mechanism: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02552 (2023).

[88]

Rui Zhang, Rui Xue, and Ling Liu. 2019. Security and privacy on blockchain. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 52, 3 (2019), 1--34.

Digital Library

[89]

Sunshine Zhang. 2023. The design principle of blockchain: An initiative for the sok of soks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00479 (2023).

[90]

Yufan Zhang, Zichao Chen, Yutong Sun, Yulin Liu, and Luyao Zhang. 2022. Blockchain Network Analysis: A Comparative Study of Decentralized Banks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.05632 (2022).

[91]

Yufan Zhang, Zichao Chen, Luyao Zhang, and Xin Tong. 2022. Visualizing Non-Fungible Token Ethics: A Case Study On CryptoPunks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.12922 (2022).

[92]

Zibin Zheng, Shaoan Xie, Hong-Ning Dai, Xiangping Chen, and Huaimin Wang. 2018. Blockchain challenges and opportunities: A survey. International journal of web and grid services 14, 4 (2018), 352--375.

Cited By

Zhang L(2024)Next-Generation Behavioral Economics: Blockchain as the Web3 Infrastructure for Experimental StudiesBlockchain - Pioneering the Web3 Infrastructure for an Intelligent Future [Working Title]10.5772/intechopen.1006740Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1006740
Dr. Devaseelan S Dr. B.M. Praveen (2024)Random Forest-Based Forensic Investigation of Non-Fungible Tokens: for Enhanced Detection and Anomaly IdentificationInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology10.32628/IJSRST241149711:6(212-219)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2411497
Liu YZhang L(2024)The Economics of Blockchain Governance: Evaluate Liquid Democracy on the Internet Computer2024 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security Companion (QRS-C)10.1109/QRS-C63300.2024.00038(225-231)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C63300.2024.00038
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

"Centralized or Decentralized?": Concerns and Value Judgments of Stakeholders in the Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) Market
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

Authentic Non Fungible Tokens
ICBTA '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Blockchain Technology and Applications

Nothing prevents several Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs) to be associated to the same digital asset, for instance, an image. As a consequence, the NFTs ecosystem is flooded with NFT replicas associated to the same assets of famous NFTs. The purpose of this ...
Suspicious trading in nonfungible tokens (NFTs)
Highlights
- Analyzes NFT trades using Benford's Law, Student's t-test, and Pareto-Levy.
- Tests reveal nonconformity, suggesting potential trading manipulation in NFT transactions.
- Subset analysis of top 50 NFTs shows adherence to Benford's Law ...
Abstract
This paper employs a three-pronged approach to examine price patterns in a substantial chunk of trades in nonfungible token (NFT) transactions to identify suspicious trading activities. Tests based on Benford's Law, clustering via Student's t-...
Scoring model for NFT evaluation
SOICT '23: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology

The non-fungible token (NFT) market has experienced significant growth in recent years. Similar to real estate and artwork, NFT is illiquid and it does not have a market price. Thus, there arises a need for a comprehensive scoring system to analyze the ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

CSCW

April 2024

6294 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3661497

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2024 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 April 2024

Published in PACMHCI Volume 8, Issue CSCW1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

Duke Kunshan University Data Science Research Center Data+X Grant

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
417
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)417
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhang L(2024)Next-Generation Behavioral Economics: Blockchain as the Web3 Infrastructure for Experimental StudiesBlockchain - Pioneering the Web3 Infrastructure for an Intelligent Future [Working Title]10.5772/intechopen.1006740Online publication date: 20-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1006740
Dr. Devaseelan S Dr. B.M. Praveen (2024)Random Forest-Based Forensic Investigation of Non-Fungible Tokens: for Enhanced Detection and Anomaly IdentificationInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology10.32628/IJSRST241149711:6(212-219)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2411497
Liu YZhang L(2024)The Economics of Blockchain Governance: Evaluate Liquid Democracy on the Internet Computer2024 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security Companion (QRS-C)10.1109/QRS-C63300.2024.00038(225-231)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C63300.2024.00038
Zhang LQuan YCao JZhou KTong X(2024)Leveraging Social Media Sentiments and Ethical Signals for NFT Valuation2024 IEEE 24th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability, and Security Companion (QRS-C)10.1109/QRS-C63300.2024.00036(206-215)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/QRS-C63300.2024.00036
Fu YJing MZhou JWu PWang YZhang LHu C(2024)Quantifying the Blockchain Trilemma: A Comparative Analysis of Algorand, Ethereum 2.0, and Beyond2024 IEEE International Conference on Metaverse Computing, Networking, and Applications (MetaCom)10.1109/MetaCom62920.2024.00028(97-104)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MetaCom62920.2024.00028
Fu YZhou MZhang L(2024)DAM: A Universal Dual Attention Mechanism for Multimodal Timeseries Cryptocurrency Trend Forecasting2024 IEEE International Conference on Metaverse Computing, Networking, and Applications (MetaCom)10.1109/MetaCom62920.2024.00025(73-80)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/MetaCom62920.2024.00025
Tian XZhuang ZZhang L(2024)Redesign Incentives in Proof-of-Stake Ethereum: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Reinforcement Learning and Mechanism Design2024 6th International Conference on Data-driven Optimization of Complex Systems (DOCS)10.1109/DOCS63458.2024.10704461(16-24)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/DOCS63458.2024.10704461
Guan MLi JHu JGu ZWang YLu ZWang K(2024)From Digital Art to Crypto Art: The Evolution of Art Brought by NFTInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2395088(1-20)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2395088
Alsadi MParacha AArshad J(2024)NFTMosaic: Piecing Together Assets in a Unified Blockchain TokenKnowledge Science, Engineering and Management10.1007/978-981-97-5501-1_27(359-374)Online publication date: 16-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-981-97-5501-1_27

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents