skip to main content
10.1145/3331453.3361679acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Assessment of Machine Learning Methods for Modeling Alpine Grassland Biomass in Southern Qinghai Province, China

Published: 22 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Accurate and effective modeling of grassland aboveground biomass (AGB) is an important basic task in monitoring and management of grassland and livestock interaction in pastoral areas. In this study, three machine learning methods, multi-layer perceptron network (MLP), support vector regression, and random forest regression (RF) are assessed for modeling the grassland AGB in the southern region, Qinghai Province, China. The results show that: 1) among the three methods, the MLP model performs the worst, with R2 and RMSE of 0.38 and 768.74 kg DW/ha, respectively for the test data, and of 0.34 and 745.06 kg DW/ha for the training dataset; 2) the RF model performs the best, with R2 and RMSE of 0.76 and 473.20 kg DW/ha, respectively for the test data, and of 0.95 and 208.88 kg DW/ha for the training dataset. This performance is similar to the best back propagation ANN model previously reported (0.66 and 556.57 kg DW/ha for test data, 0.85 and 355.04 kg DW/ha for training data, and 0.68 and 537.09 kg DW/ha for validation). The RF model is easy to apply in practice and is a robust tool for modeling grassland biomass based on DEM and remote sensing data.

References

[1]
LeCun Y, Bengio Y and Hinton G (2015). Deep Learning. Nature, 521, 436--444.
[2]
Liang TG, Yang SX, Feng QS, Liu BK, Zhang RP, Huang XD and Xie HJ (2016). Multi-factor modeling of above-ground biomass in alpine grassland: A case study in the Three-River Headwaters Region, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 186, 164--172.
[3]
Meng BP, Gao JL, Liang TG, Cui X, Ge J, Yin JP, Feng QS and Xie HJ (2018). Modeling of alpine grassland cover based on unmanned aerial vehicle technology and multi-factor methods: A case study in the east of Tibetan Plateau, China. Remote Sensing, 10(2), 320.
[4]
Xia JZ, Ma MN, Liang TG, Wu CY, Yang YH, Zhang L, Zhang YJ and Yuan WP (2017). Estimates of grassland biomass and turnover time on the Tibetan Plateau. Environmental Research Letters, 13(1), 014020.
[5]
Xie YC, Sha ZY, Yu M, Bai YF and Zhang L (2009). A comparison of two models with Landsat data for estimating above ground grassland biomass in Inner Mongolia, China. Ecological Modelling, 220, 1810--1818.
[6]
Yang SX, Feng QS, Liang TG, Liu BK, Zhang WJ and Xie HJ (2018). Modeling grassland above-ground biomass based on artificial neural network and remote sensing in the Three-River Headwaters Region. Remote Sensing of Environment, 204, 448--455.
[7]
Ali I, Greifeneder F, Stamenkovic J, Neumann M and Notarnicola C (2015). Review of machine learning approaches for biomass and soil moisture retrievals from remote sensing data. Remote Sensing, 7, 16398--16421.
[8]
Ali I, Cawkwell F, Dwyer E, Barrett B and Green S (2016). Satellite remote sensing of grasslands: from observation to management-a review. Journal of Plant Ecology, 9 (6), 1--23.
[9]
Barrachina M, Cristóbal J and Tulla AF (2015). Estimating above-ground biomass on mountain meadows and pastures through remote sensing. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 38, 184--192.
[10]
Quan XW, He BB, Yebra M, Yin CM, Liao ZM, Zhang XT and Li X (2017). A radiative transfer model-based method for the estimation of grassland aboveground biomass. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 54, 159--168.
[11]
Magiera A, Feihauer H, Waldhardt R, Wiesmair M and Otte A (2017). Modelling biomass of mountainous grasslands by including a species composition map. Ecological Indicators, 78, 8--18.
[12]
Meng BP, Liang TG, Ge J, Gao JL and Yin JP (2017). Evaluation of above ground biomass estimation accuracy for alpine meadow based on MODIS vegetation indices. ITM Web of Conferences, 12, 02003.
[13]
Wang HH and Raj B (2017) On the origin of deep learning. ArXiv e-prints.
[14]
Rinaldi M, Losavio N and Flagella Z (2003). Evaluation and application of the OILCROPSUN model for sunflower in southern Italy. Agric. Syst. 78 (1), 17--30.
[15]
Neal R M (2007). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Technometrics, 49(3), 366--366.
[16]
Mutanga O, Adam E and Cho MA (2012). High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 399--406.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Estimation, Spatiotemporal Dynamics, and Driving Factors of Grassland Biomass Carbon Storage Based on Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of the Hulunbuir GrasslandRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1619370916:19(3709)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
  • (2023)Spatial-Temporal Pattern Analysis of Grassland Yield in Mongolian Plateau Based on Artificial Neural NetworkRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1516396815:16(3968)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2023

Index Terms

  1. Assessment of Machine Learning Methods for Modeling Alpine Grassland Biomass in Southern Qinghai Province, China

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CSAE '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
    October 2019
    942 pages
    ISBN:9781450362948
    DOI:10.1145/3331453
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 October 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Aboveground biomass
    2. Multi-layer perceptron
    3. Random forest regression
    4. Remote sensing
    5. Support vector regression

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSAE 2019

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 368 of 770 submissions, 48%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Estimation, Spatiotemporal Dynamics, and Driving Factors of Grassland Biomass Carbon Storage Based on Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of the Hulunbuir GrasslandRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1619370916:19(3709)Online publication date: 5-Oct-2024
    • (2023)Spatial-Temporal Pattern Analysis of Grassland Yield in Mongolian Plateau Based on Artificial Neural NetworkRemote Sensing10.3390/rs1516396815:16(3968)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media