skip to main content
10.1145/3241815.3241868acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiteConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Tale of Two Majors: When Information Technology is Embedded within a Department of Computer Science

Published: 14 September 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Student success is one of the most widely discussed topics in the higher education literature. One understudied factor that may have a significant impact on student success is the effect of co-locating two different undergraduate programs - specifically, Computer Science (CS) and Information Technology (IT) - in the same department. In this paper, we examine student data from the IT and CS undergraduate programs at a large, public university to identify and compare the paths of IT and CS students, who started the program in Fall 2008 and dropped out, changed their major, or successfully completed the program by Summer 2013. We also conducted an open-ended survey of 165 IT and CS students to determine their perceptions of the two programs. Our results suggest a tiered relationship between the two programs, where CS appears to be a more volatile and rigorous of a major in terms of student pathways and perceptions. We conclude that social comparisons that occur due to the way these programs were established at the target university contribute to this imbalance. Based on our analyses, we propose measures to mitigate negative social comparisons between the two programs and make IT a standalone program contributing to student success.

References

[1]
Akbaş, M.I., Basavaraj, P. and Georgiopoulos, M., 2015. Curriculum GPS: an adaptive curriculum generation and planning system. In Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).
[2]
Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., Van der Werf, G., Buunk, A.P. and van der Zee, Y.G., 2008. Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of educational research, 78(4), pp.828--879.
[3]
Festinger, L., 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), pp.117--140.
[4]
Heileman, G.L., Babbitt, T.H. and Abdallah, C.T., 2015. Visualizing student flows: Busting myths about student movement and success. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(3), pp.30--39.
[5]
Horn, L., 2006. Placing College Graduation Rates in Context: How 4-Year College Graduation Rates Vary with Selectivity and the Size of Low-Income Enrollment. Postsecondary Education Descriptive Analysis Report. NCES 2007--161. National Center for Education Statistics.
[6]
Jaeger, A.J. and Hinz, D., 2008. The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshmen retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(3), pp.265--286.
[7]
Kemmelmeier, M. and Oyserman, D., 2001. The ups and downs of thinking about a successful other: self?construals and the consequences of social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(3), pp.311--320.
[8]
Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J.H. and Whitt, E.J., 2011. Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. John Wiley & Sons.
[9]
Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., Wiesenmayer, R. and McCluskey, F., 2010. Student perceptions of the relationship between indicators of teaching presence and success in online courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(1).
[10]
Leung, S., Said, H. and Stockman, M., 2004, October. Enroute to making an IT baccalaureate program. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education (pp. 255--260). ACM.
[11]
Miller, L.D., Soh, L.K., Chiriacescu, V., Ingraham, E., Shell, D.F., Ramsay, S. and Hazley, M.P., 2013, October. Improving learning of computational thinking using creative thinking exercises in CS-1 computer science courses. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 2013 IEEE (pp. 1426--1432). IEEE.
[12]
Nauta, M.M., 2007. Assessing college students' satisfaction with their academic majors. Journal of Career Assessment, 15(4), pp.446--462.
[13]
Reichgelt, H., Lunt, B.M., Ashford, T., Phelps, A., Slazinski, E. and Willis, C., 2004. A comparison of baccalaureate programs in information technology with baccalaureate programs in computer science and information systems. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 3, pp.19--34.
[14]
Schurtz, I.M., Pfost, M., Nagengast, B. and Artelt, C., 2014. Impact of social and dimensional comparisons on student's mathematical and English subject-interest at the beginning of secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 34, pp.32--41.
[15]
Tinto, V., 2006. The assessment of student retention programs. Faculty Convocation at Maricopa College, Phoenix, AZ. Retrieved September 22, p.2009.
[16]
Traver, A.E., Volchok, E., Bidjerano, T. and Shea, P., 2014. Correlating community college students' perceptions of community of inquiry presences with their completion of blended courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, pp.1--9.
[17]
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). The Condition of Education 2017 (NCES 2017--144), Undergraduate Retention and Graduation Rates.
[18]
Wang, D., Zhu, L., Maguire, P., Liu, Y., Pang, K., Li, Z. and Hu, Y., 2016. The influence of social comparison and peer group size on risky decision-making. Frontiers in psychology, 7, p.1232.
[19]
Wiencke, W.R., 2002. Exemption exam for an introductory education technology course: Findings from two years of use. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), pp.119--130
[20]
Wigdahl, J., 2013. Assessment of Curriculum Graphs With Respect To Student Flow And Graduation Rates. Albuquerque, New Mexico: The University of New Mexico.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A Tale of Two Majors: When Information Technology is Embedded within a Department of Computer Science

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGITE '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIG Conference on Information Technology Education
    September 2018
    204 pages
    ISBN:9781450359542
    DOI:10.1145/3241815
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 September 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. data analytics.
    2. graduation rates
    3. information technology
    4. program improvement
    5. retention
    6. social comparisons
    7. student success
    8. student transitions

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Targeted Educational Attainment (TEAm) Grant

    Conference

    SIGITE '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGITE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 59 submissions, 41%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 176 of 429 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)32
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media