skip to main content
10.1145/3033701.3033718acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Accessible smart cities?: Inspecting the accessibility of Brazilian municipalities' mobile applications

Published: 04 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The use of interactive technologies to aid in the implementation of smart cities has a significant potential to support disabled users in performing their activities as citizens. In this study, we present an investigation of the accessibility of a sample of 10 mobile Android™ applications of Brazilian municipalities, two from each of the five big geographical regions of the country, focusing especially on users with visual disabilities. The results showed that many of the applications were not in accordance with accessibility guidelines, with an average of 57 instances of violations and an average of 11.6 different criteria violated per application. The main problems included issues like not addressing labelling of non-textual content, headings, identifying user location, colour contrast, enabling users to interact using screen reader gestures, focus visibility and lack of adaptation of text contained in image. Although the growth in mobile applications for has boosted the possibilities aligned with the principles of smart cities, there is a strong need for including accessibility in the design of such applications in order for disabled people to benefit from the potential they can have for their lives.

References

[1]
Android. 2016. Android Accessibility Development Guide. (2016). Available online at http://bit.ly/1DCieuZ. Last accessed 10th August 2016.
[2]
Apple. 2016. Accessibility Programming Guide for iOS. (2016). Available online at http://apple.co/2aMKbIl. Last accessed 10th August 2016.
[3]
Ben Caldwell, Michael Cooper, Loretta Guarino Reid, and Gregg Vanderheiden. 2008. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. (2008). Available online at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/. Last accessed 12th June 2016.
[4]
Sarah Chiti and Barbara Leporini. 2012. Accessibility of Android-based Mobile Devices: A Prototype to Investigate Interaction with Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs - Volume Part II (ICCHP'12). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 607--614.
[5]
Raphael Clegg-Vinell, Christopher Bailey, and Voula Gkatzidou. 2014. Investigating the Appropriateness and Relevance of Mobile Web Accessibility Guidelines. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference (W4A'14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 4 pages.
[6]
Kantar Worldpanel ComTech. 2016. (2016). Available online at http://www.kantarworldpanel.com/global/smartphoneos- market-share/. Last accessed 12th June 2016.
[7]
D. López de Ipiña, B. Klein, S. Vanhecke, and J. Pérez-Velasco. 2013. Towards Ambient Assisted Cities and Citizens. In Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), 2013 27th International Conference on. 1343--1348.
[8]
Kotaro Hara, Vicki Le, and Jon Froehlich. 2013. Combining Crowdsourcing and Google Street View to Identify Street-level Accessibility Problems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 631--640.
[9]
International Standards Organization. 1998. ISO 9241-11 - Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 11: guidance on usability. (1998).
[10]
Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2011. Usable Gestures for Blind People: Understanding Preference and Performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 413--422.
[11]
Barbara Leporini, Maria Claudia Buzzi, and Marina Buzzi. 2012. Interacting with mobile devices via VoiceOver: usability and accessibility issues. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. ACM, 339--348.
[12]
Lesley J. McIntyre and Vicki L. Hanson. 2014. Buildings and Users with Visual Impairment: Uncovering Factors for Accessibility Using BIT-Kit. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--66.
[13]
Donald McMillan, Arvid Engström, Airi Lampinen, and Barry Brown. 2016. Data and the City. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2933--2944.
[14]
Donald McNeill. 2015. Global firms and smart technologies: IBM and the reduction of cities. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 40, 4 (2015), 562--574.
[15]
S. Mirri, C. Prandi, and P. Salomoni. 2016. Personalizing Pedestrian Accessible way-finding with mPASS. In 2016 13th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC). 1119--1124.
[16]
Taewoo Nam and Theresa A. Pardo. 2011. Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times (dg.o '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 282--291.
[17]
Paolo Neirotti, Alberto de Marco, Anna Corinna Cagliano, Giulio Mangano, and Francesco Scorrano. 2014. Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38 (2014), 25--36.
[18]
International Standards Organization. 2008. ISO 9241-171 - Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 171: Guidance on software accessibility. (2008).
[19]
Kyudong Park, Taedong Goh, and Hyo-Jeong So. 2014. Toward Accessible Mobile Application Design: Developing Mobile Application Accessibility Guidelines for People with Visual Impairment. In Proceedings of HCI Korea (HCIK '15). Hanbit Media, Inc., South Korea, 31--38. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2729485.2729491
[20]
Lara Schibelsky G. Piccolo, Ewerton M. de Menezes, and Bruno de Campos Buccolo. 2011. Developing an Accessible Interaction Model for Touch Screen Mobile Devices: Preliminary Results. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 222--226. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254474
[21]
Ornella Plos and Stéphanie Buisine. 2006. Universal Design for Mobile Phones: A Case Study. In CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1229--1234.
[22]
Jathan Sadowski and Frank A Pasquale. 2015. The spectrum of control: A social theory of the smart city. First Monday 20, 7 (2015).
[23]
Leandro Coelho Serra, Lucas Pedroso Carvalho, Lucas Pereira Ferreira, Jorge Belimar Silva Vaz, and André Pimenta Freire. 2015. Accessibility Evaluation of E-Government Mobile Applications in Brazil. 6th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion. Procedia Computer Science 67 (2015), 348--357.
[24]
Rayoung Yang, Sangmi Park, Sonali R. Mishra, Zhenan Hong, Clint Newsom, Hyeon Joo, Erik Hofer, and Mark W. Newman. 2011. Supporting Spatial Awareness and Independent Wayfinding for Pedestrians with Visual Impairments. In The Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 27--34.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Accessible smart cities?: Inspecting the accessibility of Brazilian municipalities' mobile applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IHC '16: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    October 2016
    431 pages
    ISBN:9781450352352
    DOI:10.1145/3033701
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Accessibility evaluation
    2. Mobile accessibility
    3. Smart Cities

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    IHC '16

    Acceptance Rates

    IHC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 58 of 158 submissions, 37%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 331 of 973 submissions, 34%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)23
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media