skip to main content
10.1145/2883851.2883904acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The role of achievement goal orientations when studying effect of learning analytics visualizations

Published: 25 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

When designing learning analytics tools for use by learners we have an opportunity to provide tools that consider a particular learner's situation and the learner herself. To afford actual impact on learning, such tools have to be informed by theories of education. Particularly, educational research shows that individual differences play a significant role in explaining students' learning process. However, limited empirical research in learning analytics has investigated the role of theoretical constructs, such as motivational factors, that are underlying the observed differences between individuals. In this work, we conducted a field experiment to examine the effect of three designed learning analytics visualizations on students' participation in online discussions in authentic course settings. Using hierarchical linear mixed models, our results revealed that effects of visualizations on the quantity and quality of messages posted by students with differences in achievement goal orientations could either be positive or negative. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of considering individual differences and pose important implications for future design and research of learning analytics visualizations.

References

[1]
Akyol, Z. and Garrison, D. R. 2011. Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British J. of Educational Technology. 42, 2, 233--250.
[2]
Arnold, K. and Pistilli, M. 2012. Course signals at Purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. The 2nd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 267--270.
[3]
Biggs, J. B. 1987. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Research Monograph. ERIC.
[4]
Brusilovsky, P., Hsiao, I.-H. and Folajimi, Y. 2011. QuizMap: open social student modeling and adaptive navigation support with TreeMaps. Towards Ubiq. Learning. 71--82.
[5]
Bull, S. and Kay, J. 2008. Metacognition and open learner models. The 3rd Workshop on Meta-Cognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Educational Technologies, at ITS2008, 7--20.
[6]
Corrin, L. and de Barba, P. 2014. Exploring students' interpretation of feedback delivered through learning analytics dashboards. Proc. of the ascilite 2014 conference, 201--205.
[7]
Dawson, S., Bakharia, A. and Heathcote, E. 2010. SNAPP: Realising the affordances of real-time SNA within networked learning environments. Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Networked Learning, 125--133.
[8]
Dimitrova, V. 2003. STyLE-OLM: Interactive open learner modelling. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED). 13, 35--78.
[9]
Dowell, N. M., Cade, W. L., Tausczik, Y., Pennebaker, J. and Graesser, A. C. 2014. What works: Creating adaptive and intelligent systems for collaborative learning support. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 124--133.
[10]
Dowell, N. M., Graesser, A. C. and Cai, Z. Language and Discourse Analysis with Coh-Metrix: Applications from Educational Material to Learning Environments at Scale, Journal of Learning Analytics, in press.
[11]
Elliot, A. J. 1999. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educ. Psychologist. 34, 3, 169--189.
[12]
Elliot, A. J., Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. 2005. A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. Handbook of Competence and Motivation. 16, 52--72.
[13]
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K. and Pekrun, R. 2011. A 3×2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology. 103, 3, 632.
[14]
Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W. and Landauer, T. K. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes. 25, 2-3, 285--307.
[15]
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. Springer series in statistics Springer, Berlin.
[16]
Gašević, D., Adesope, O., Joksimović, S. and Kovanović, V. 2015. Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education. 24, 53--65.
[17]
Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., Duval, E. and Pardo, A. 2012. The student activity meter for awareness and self-reflection. CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 869--884.
[18]
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S. and Kulikowich, J. M. 2011. Coh-Metrix providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher. 40, 5, 223--234.
[19]
Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Adesope, O. and Hatala, M. 2014. Psychological characteristics in cognitive presence of communities of inquiry: A linguistic analysis of online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education. 22, 1--10.
[20]
Kanuka, H. and Anderson, T. 2007. Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education. 13, 1, 57--74.
[21]
Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K. and Reimann, P. 2006. The big five and visualisations of team work activity. Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Intel. Tutoring Systems, 197--206.
[22]
Kerly, A., Ellis, R. and Bull, S. 2008. CALMsystem: a conversational agent for learner modelling. Knowledge-Based Systems. 21, 3, 238--246.
[23]
Kruse, A. and Pongsajapan, R. 2012. Student-centered learning analytics. CNDLS Thought Papers, 1--9.
[24]
Leony, D., Pardo, A., de la Fuente Valentín, L., de Castro, D. S. and Kloos, C. D. 2012. GLASS: a learning analytics visualization tool. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 162--163.
[25]
Luppicini, R. 2007. Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science. 35, 2, 141--185.
[26]
Maehr, M. L. 1989. Thoughts about motivation. Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions. 3, 1, 299--315.
[27]
Mazza, R. and Milani, C. 2004. Gismo: a graphical interactive student monitoring tool for course management systems. Int. Conf. on Technology-Enhanced Learning, 1--8.
[28]
Nakahara, J., Hisamatsu, S., Yaegashi, K. and Yamauchi, Y. 2005. iTree: Does the mobile phone encourage learners to be more involved in collaborative learning? Proc. of the Conf. on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Learning 2005: the next 10 years!, 470--478.
[29]
Rovai, A. P. 2007. Facilitating online discussions effectively. The Internet and Higher Education. 10, 1, 77--88.
[30]
Santos, J. L., Verbert, K., Govaerts, S. and Duval, E. 2013. Addressing learner issues with StepUp!: an Evaluation. The 3rd Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 14--22.
[31]
Schielzeth, H. and Nakagawa, S. 2013. Nested by design: model fitting and interpretation in a mixed model era. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 4, 1, 14--24.
[32]
Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S. and Harackiewicz, J. M. 2011. Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist. 46, 1, 26--47.
[33]
Shum, S. B. and Ferguson, R. 2012. Social learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 15, 3, 3--26.
[34]
Snow, R. E. 1991. Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy. J. of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 59, 2, 205--216.
[35]
Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S. and Santos, J. L. 2013. Learning analytics dashboard applications. American Behavioral Scientist. 57, 10, 1500--1509.
[36]
Winne, P. H. 2010. Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educ. Psychologist. 45, 4, 267--276.
[37]
Winne, P. H. and Hadwin, A. F. 1998. Studying as self-regulated learning. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. 93, 27--30.
[38]
Wise, A. F. 2014. Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 203--211.
[39]
Wise, A. F., Hausknecht, S. N. and Zhao, Y. 2014. Attending to others' posts in asynchronous discussions: Learners' online "listening" and its relationship to speaking. Int. Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 9, 2, 185--209.
[40]
Wise, A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F. and Hsiao, Y.-T. 2013. Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: examining patterns in learners' online listening behaviors. Instructional Science. 41, 2, 323--343.
[41]
Wise, A., Zhao, Y. and Hausknecht, S. 2014. Learning analytics for online discussions: Embedded and extracted approaches. Journal of Learning Analytics. 1, 2, 48--71.
[42]
Xu, R. 2003. Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in Medicine. 22, 22, 3527--3541.
[43]
Yuan, J. and Kim, C. 2014. Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning communities in online courses. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning. 30, 3, 220--232.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. The role of achievement goal orientations when studying effect of learning analytics visualizations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      LAK '16: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge
      April 2016
      567 pages
      ISBN:9781450341905
      DOI:10.1145/2883851
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 25 April 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. achievement goal orientation
      2. dashboards
      3. learning analytics
      4. online discussions
      5. visualizations

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      LAK '16

      Acceptance Rates

      LAK '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 116 submissions, 31%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 236 of 782 submissions, 30%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media