skip to main content
10.1145/2639108.2639118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experiencing and handling the diversity in data density and environmental locality in an indoor positioning service

Published: 07 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Diversity in training data density and environment locality is intrinsic in the real-world deployment of indoor localization systems and has a major impact on the performance of existing localization approaches. In this paper, through micro-benchmarks, we find that fingerprint-based approaches are preferable in scenarios where a dense database is available; while model-based approaches are the method of choice in the case of sparse data. It should be noted, however, that practical situations are complex. A single deployment often features both sparse and dense sampled areas. Furthermore, the internal layout affects the propagation of radio signals and exhibits environmental impacts. A certain number of measurement samples may be sufficient for one part of the building, but entirely insufficient for another. Thus, finding the right indoor localization algorithm for a given large-scale deployment is challenging, if not impossible; there is no one-size-fits-all indoor localization approach.
Realizing the fundamental fact that the quality of the location database capturing the actual radio map dictates localization accuracy, in this paper, we propose Modellet, an algorithmic approach that optimally approximates the actual radio map by unifying model-based and fingerprint-based approaches. Modellet represents the radio map using a fingerprint-cloud that incorporates both measured real fingerprints and virtual fingerprints, which are computed from models with a local support, based on the key concept of the supporting set. We evaluate Modellet with data collected from an office building as well as 13 large-scale deployment venues (shopping malls and airports), located across China, U.S., and Germany. Comparing Modellet with two representative baseline approaches, RADAR and EZPerfect, demonstrates that Modellet effectively adapts to different data densities and environmental conditions, substantially outperforming existing approaches.

References

[1]
Cisco wireless lan controller configuration guide, release 4.1.
[2]
Googlers Talk Indoor Maps For 40 Minutes. http://www.webpronews.com/googlers-talk-indoor-maps-for-40-minutes-video-2013-05.
[3]
IN-Location Alliance. http://www.in-location-alliance.com/.
[4]
M. Azizyan, I. Constandache, and R. Roy Choudhury. Surroundsense: mobile phone localization via ambience fingerprinting. In Mobicom, pages 261--272. ACM, 2009.
[5]
P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. Radar: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system. In INFOCOM, volume 2, pages 775--784. Ieee, 2000.
[6]
G. Chandrasekaran, M. Ergin, J. Yang, S. Liu, Y. Chen, M. Gruteser, and R. Martin. Empirical evaluation of the limits on localization using signal strength. In SECON, pages 1--9, 2009.
[7]
M. Y. Chen, T. Sohn, D. Chmelev, D. Haehnel, J. Hightower, J. Hughes, A. LaMarca, F. Potter, I. Smith, and A. Varshavsky. Practical metropolitan-scale positioning for gsm phones. In UbiComp, pages 225--242. Springer, 2006.
[8]
Y. Chen, D. Lymberopoulos, J. Liu, and B. Priyantha. Fm-based indoor localization. In Mobisys, pages 169--182. ACM, 2012.
[9]
K. Chintalapudi, A. Padmanabha Iyer, and V. N. Padmanabhan. Indoor localization without the pain. In Mobicom, pages 173--184. ACM, 2010.
[10]
J. Chung, M. Donahoe, C. Schmandt, I.-J. Kim, P. Razavai, and M. Wiseman. Indoor location sensing using geo-magnetism. MobiSys, page 141, 2011.
[11]
L. F. M. de Moraes and B. A. A. Nunes. Calibration-free wlan location system based on dynamic mapping of signal strength. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Mobility management and wireless access, pages 92--99. ACM, 2006.
[12]
E. Elnahrawy, X. Li, and R. Martin. The limits of localization using signal strength: a comparative study. In SECON, pages 406--414, 2004.
[13]
S.-h. Fang, C.-h. Wang, S.-m. Chiou, and P. Lin. Calibration-free Approaches for Robust Wi-Fi Positioning Against Device Diversity: A Performance Comparison. VTC Spring, 2012.
[14]
A. Goswami, L. E. Ortiz, and S. R. Das. Wigem: a learning-based approach for indoor localization. In COnference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, page 3. ACM, 2011.
[15]
Y. Gwon and R. Jain. Error Characteristics and Calibration-free Techniques for Wireless LAN-based Location Estimation. MobiWac, pages 2--9, 2004.
[16]
P. Hu, L. Li, C. Peng, G. Shen, and F. Zhao. Pharos: Enable Physical Analytics through Visible Light based Indoor Localization. HotNets, 2013.
[17]
Y. Ji, S. Biaz, S. Pandey, and P. Agrawal. Ariadne: a dynamic indoor signal map construction and localization system. In Mobisys, pages 151--164. ACM, 2006.
[18]
N. Kodippili and D. Dias. Integration of fingerprinting and trilateration techniques for improved indoor localization. In WOCN, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2010.
[19]
P. Krishnan, A. Krishnakumar, W.-H. Ju, C. Mallows, and S. Gamt. A system for lease: Location estimation assisted by stationary emitters for indoor rf wireless networks. In INFOCOM, volume 2, pages 1001--1011. IEEE, 2004.
[20]
J. Krumm and J. Platt. Minimizing calibration efforts for an indoor 802.11 device location measurement system. MSR-TR-2003-82, 2003.
[21]
B. Li, A. G. Dempster, C. Rizos, and J. Barnes. Hybrid method for localization using WLAN. Spatial Sciences Conference, 2005.
[22]
F. Li, C. Zhao, G. Ding, J. Gong, C. Liu, and F. Zhao. A reliable and accurate indoor localization method using phone inertial sensors. In Ubicomp, pages 421--430. ACM, 2012.
[23]
H. Lim, L.-c. Kung, J. C. Hou, and H. Luo. Zero-Configuration, Robust Indoor Localization: Theory and Experimentation. INFOCOM, pages 1--13, 2005.
[24]
H. Liu, Y. Gan, J. Yang, S. Sidhom, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, and F. Ye. Push the limit of wifi based localization for smartphones. In Mobicom, pages 305--316. ACM, 2012.
[25]
K. Liu, X. Liu, and X. Li. Guoguo: Enabling Fine-grained Indoor Localization via Smartphone Categories and Subject Descriptors. Mobisys, 2013.
[26]
D. Madigan, E. Einahrawy, R. P. Martin, W.-H. Ju, P. Krishnan, and A. Krishnakumar. Bayesian indoor positioning systems. In INFOCOM 2005, volume 2, pages 1217--1227. IEEE, 2005.
[27]
A. Matic, A. Papliatseyeu, V. Osmani, and O. Mayora-Ibarra. Tuning to your position: Fm radio based indoor localization with spontaneous recalibration. In PerCom, pages 153--161. IEEE, 2010.
[28]
R. Nandakumar, K. K. Chintalapudi, and V. N. Padmanabhan. Centaur: Locating Devices in an Office Environment. In Mobicom, 2012.
[29]
J.-g. Park, D. Curtis, and J. Ledlie. Implications of Device Diversity for Organic Localization. INFOCOM, pages 3182--3190, 2011.
[30]
N. B. Priyantha, A. Chakraborty, and H. Balakrishnan. The cricket location-support system. In Mobicom, pages 32--43. ACM, 2000.
[31]
A. Rai, K. K. Chintalapudi, V. N. Padmanabhan, and R. Sen. Zee: Zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization. In Mobicom, pages 293--304. ACM, 2012.
[32]
S. Sen, B. Radunovic, R. R. Choudhury, and T. Minka. You are facing the mona lisa: spot localization using phy layer information. In Mobisys, pages 183--196. ACM, 2012.
[33]
G. Shen, Z. Chen, P. Zhang, T. Moscibroda, and Y. Zhang. Walkie-Markie: Indoor Pathway Mapping Made Easy. NSDI, 2013.
[34]
S. P. Tarzia, P. a. Dinda, R. P. Dick, and G. Memik. Indoor localization without infrastructure using the acoustic background spectrum. MobiSys, 2011.
[35]
D. Turner, S. Savage, and A. C. Snoeren. On the empirical performance of self-calibrating wifi location systems. In LCN, pages 76--84. IEEE, 2011.
[36]
R. Want, A. Hopper, V. Falcão, and J. Gibbons. The active badge location system. TOIS, 10(1):91--102, 1992.
[37]
J. Xiong and K. Jamieson. ArrayTrack: A Fine-Grained Indoor Location System. NSDI, (279976):71--84, 2013.
[38]
Z. Yang, C. Wu, and Y. Liu. Locating in fingerprint space: wireless indoor localization with little human intervention. In Mobicom, pages 269--280. ACM, 2012.
[39]
S. Yoon, K. Lee, and I. Rhee. Fm-based indoor localization via automatic fingerprint db construction and matching. In Mobisys, pages 207--220. ACM, 2013.
[40]
M. Youssef and A. Agrawala. The horus wlan location determination system. Mobisys, 2005.
[41]
M. A. Youssef, A. Agrawala, and A. Udaya Shankar. Wlan location determination via clustering and probability distributions. In PerCom, pages 143--150. IEEE, 2003.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Experiencing and handling the diversity in data density and environmental locality in an indoor positioning service

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '14: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
      September 2014
      650 pages
      ISBN:9781450327831
      DOI:10.1145/2639108
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. fingerprint
      2. indoor localization
      3. model

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      MobiCom'14
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      MobiCom '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 220 submissions, 16%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 440 of 2,972 submissions, 15%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      EPUB

      View this article in ePub.

      ePub

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media