research-article

Towards identification and classification of core and threshold concepts in methodology education in computing

Authors:

Sirkku Männikkö-Barbutiu,

Johannes CronjéAuthors Info & Claims

ITiCSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education

Pages 237 - 242

https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591758

Published: 21 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Research methodology is a quintessential component of science, but methods differ greatly between sciences. In computing, methods are borrowed from many fields, which causes difficulties to methodology education in computing. In our methodology courses in computing, we have observed a number of core and threshold concepts that affect students' success. This essay describes a work in progress towards understanding those core and threshold concepts in methodology education in computing, classified along two dimensions. We classify methodological concepts in terms of standard elements of research design in students' projects in computing, and in terms of their centrality and difficulty. We present examples of three types of troublesome knowledge concerning methodology: the strangeness and complexity of methodological concepts, misimpressions from everyday experience, and reasonable but mistaken expectations.

References

[1]

J. Biggs and C. Tang. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Open University Press, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 2011.

[2]

J. Carreira and J. G. Silva. Computer science and the Pygmalion effect. Computer, 31(2):116--117, 1998.

Digital Library

[3]

J. W. Creswell. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 3rd edition, 2007.

[4]

J. W. Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 3rd edition, 2009.

[5]

J. C. Cronjé. The ABC (aim, belief, concern) instant research question generator. Unpublished Manuscript, 2012.

[6]

P. J. Denning, C. Chang, and CC2001 Joint Task Force. Computing curricula 2001: Computer science volume. pdf, March 2001.

[7]

D. G. Feitelson. Experimental computer science: The need for a cultural change. Unpublished Manuscript, December 3, 2006, 2006.

[8]

P. Fletcher. The role of experiments in computer science. Journal of Systems and Software, 30(1--2):161--163, 1995.

Digital Library

[9]

R. L. Glass. A structure-based critique of contemporary computing research. Journal of Systems and Software, 28(1):3--7, 1995.

Digital Library

[10]

R. L. Glass, V. Ramesh, and I. Vessey. An analysis of research in computing disciplines. Communications of the ACM, 47(6):89--94, 2004.

Digital Library

[11]

M. Goldweber, J. Impagliazzo, I. A. Bogoiavlenski, A. G. Clear, G. Davies, H. Flack, J. P. Myers, and R. Rasala. Historical perspectives on the computing curriculum. SIGCUE Outlook, 25(4):94--111, 1997.

Digital Library

[12]

E. G. Guba and Y. S. Lincoln. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, editors, Handbook of Qualitative Research, pages 105--117. SAGE, London, UK, 1994.

[13]

J. Gustedt, E. Jeannot, and M. Quinson. Experimental methodologies for large-scale systems: A survey. Parallel Processing Letters, 19(3):399--418, 2009.

[14]

C. G. Hempel. Aspects of Scientific Explanation And Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press, New York, NY, USA, 1965.

[15]

P. Johannesson and E. Perjons. A design science primer. Unpublished Manuscript, February 25 2012.

[16]

C. Marshall and G. B. Rossman. Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 4th edition, 2006.

[17]

G. McKee. Computer science or simply 'computics'?, the open channel. Computer, 28(12):136, 1995.

Digital Library

[18]

J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land. Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practicing within the Disciplines. Number 4 in Occasional Reports. ETL Project, Universities of Edinburgh, Coventry and Durham, 2003.

[19]

J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land. Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: An introduction. In J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land, editors, Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, pages 3--18. Routledge, London, UK, 2006.

[20]

D. Perkins. Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land, editors, Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, pages 33--47. Routledge, London, UK, 2006.

[21]

G. Pólya. How to Solve It. Penguin Books Ltd., London, UK, 2nd edition, 1957.

[22]

K. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London, UK, 1959.

[23]

V. Ramesh, R. L. Glass, and I. Vessey. Research in computer science: An empirical study. The Journal of Systems and Software, 70(1--2):165--176, 2004.

Digital Library

[24]

J. J. Randolph. Multidisciplinary Methods in Educational Technology Research and Development. HAMK University of Applied Sciences, H\"ameenlinna, Finland, 2008.

[25]

J. J. Randolph. A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13):1--13, 2009.

[26]

Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. National qualifications framework. Technical Report 12-5202-10, Högskoleverket, May 2011.

[27]

M. Tedre. Methodology education in computing: Towards a congruent design approach. In Proceedings of ACM Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) 2013 Conference, pages 159--164, Denver, CO, USA, March 6--9 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[28]

M. Tedre and N. Moisseinen. Experiments in computing: A survey. The Scientific World Journal, 2014(\# 549398):1--11, 2014.

[29]

M. Tedre and J. Pajunen. An easy approach to epistemology and ontology in computing theses. In Proceedings of the 13th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling '13, pages 97--104, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.

Digital Library

[30]

M. Tedre and E. Sutinen. Three traditions of computing: What educators should know. Computer Science Education, 18(3):153--170, 2008.

[31]

I. Vessey, V. Ramesh, and R. L. Glass. Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2):129--174, 2002.

Digital Library

[32]

G. H. von Wright. Explanation and Understanding. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, UK, 1971.

[33]

M. V. Zelkowitz and D. R. Wallace. Experimental validation in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 39(11):735--743, 1997.

Digital Library

[34]

M. V. Zelkowitz and D. R. Wallace. Experimental models for validating technology. Computer, 31(5):23--31, 1998.

Digital Library

Cited By

McSkimming BMackay SDecker A(2023)Identification of Threshold Concepts for Intermediate Computer Science Students2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343211(1-5)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343211
Agbo FNtinda MLópez-Pernas SSaqr MApiola M(2023)Computing Education Research in the Global SouthPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_15(311-333)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_15
Hubbard Cheuoua ASherriff MMerkle LCutter PMonge ASheard J(2021)Confronting Inequities in Computer Science Education: A Case for Critical TheoryProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432453(425-430)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3408877.3432453
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Towards identification and classification of core and threshold concepts in methodology education in computing
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education

Recommendations

Computing Teachers' Perspectives on Threshold Concepts: Functions and Procedural Abstraction
WiPSCE '17: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education

With the introduction of the new computing curriculum in England, teachers are facing many challenges, among them the teaching of computer programming. Literature suggests that the conceptual understanding of this subject contributes to its difficulty ...
Methodology education in computing: towards a congruent design approach
SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

All major computing curricula recommendations mention methodological skills and knowledge as an important learning objective in undergraduate and graduate education. None of those curricula recommendations, however, include a methodology course for ...
Computing Education: Beyond the Classroom

Computing is the new literacy, and teaching computing in a world where computers are ubiquitous demands new techniques and contexts for learning. As these evolve, so too will the student profile.

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ITiCSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science education

June 2014

378 pages

ISBN:9781450328333

DOI:10.1145/2591708

Conference Chairs:
Åsa Cajander
Uppsala University, Sweden
,
Mats Daniels
Uppsala University, Sweden
,
Program Chairs:
Tony Clear
Auckland University of Technology, NZ
,
Arnold Pears
Uppsala University, Sweden

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Bilkent University: Bilkent University
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 June 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ITICSE '14

Sponsor:

Bilkent University
SIGCSE

ITICSE '14: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education Conference 2014

June 21 - 25, 2014

Uppsala, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

ITiCSE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 164 submissions, 22%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Upcoming Conference

ITiCSE '25

Sponsor:
sigcse

Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

June 27 - July 2, 2025

Nijmegen , Netherlands

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
186
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 06 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

McSkimming BMackay SDecker A(2023)Identification of Threshold Concepts for Intermediate Computer Science Students2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343211(1-5)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343211
Agbo FNtinda MLópez-Pernas SSaqr MApiola M(2023)Computing Education Research in the Global SouthPast, Present and Future of Computing Education Research10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_15(311-333)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25336-2_15
Hubbard Cheuoua ASherriff MMerkle LCutter PMonge ASheard J(2021)Confronting Inequities in Computer Science Education: A Case for Critical TheoryProceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education10.1145/3408877.3432453(425-430)Online publication date: 3-Mar-2021
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3408877.3432453
Kaijanaho AMontero CJoy M(2017)Teaching master's degree students to read research literatureProceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3141880.3141893(143-147)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3141880.3141893

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten