research-article

Collaborative modelling of reflection to inform the development and evaluation of work-based learning technologies

Authors:

Birgit Krogstie,

James Lockerbie,

Kristin KnipferAuthors Info & Claims

i-KNOW '12: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies

Article No.: 1, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/2362456.2362458

Published: 05 September 2012 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper we report the use of a goal modelling approach to produce a shared model of reflective learning in a research project. The project successfully applied the i* modelling approach to bridge from theory to technical and work requirements in diverse application domains. This proved to be an effective approach for agreeing on important concepts as well as establishing common ground between a diverse range of scientific and practice-oriented people. This made it possible to agree upon an emerging reflective learning model in the project that made tacit knowledge explicit, and explicit knowledge more precise.

References

[1]

Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., and Mead, M. 1987. The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11.3 (1987), 369--386

Digital Library

[2]

Boud, D., Keogh, R., and Walker, D. 1985. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Routledge Falmer.

[3]

Clark, H. H. and Brennan, S. E. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D., Teasley, Eds. APA, Washington, 127--149.

[4]

Dewey, J. 1933. How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D. C. Heath, Boston.

[5]

http://istar.rwth-aachen.de/tikiindexphp?page=i%2A?Tools&structure=i%2A?Wiki?Home

[6]

Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

[7]

Krogstie, J., Dalberg V. and Jensen, S. M. 2004. Harmonising Business Processes of Collaborative Networked Organization Using Process Modelling. In Proceedings of PROVE'04 Toulouse, France

[8]

Krogstie, J. 2012: Model-based Development and Evolution of Information Systems: A Quality Approach. Springer, London.

Digital Library

[9]

Lockerbie, J. and Maiden, N. A. M. 2006: REDEPEND: Extending i* Modelling into Requirements Processes. In Proceedings 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, Minneapolis-Saint Paul, 361--362.

Digital Library

[10]

Lockerbie, J., Karlsen, K., Puccio, M., Morreale, V. and Bonura, S. 2008. Using Requirements to Define Services for Service-Centric Food Traceability Information Systems. In Proceedings of SOCCER (Service-Oriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements) Workshop at RE'08 Conference, Barcelona, 15--23.

Digital Library

[11]

Maiden N. A. M., Jones S. V., Manning S., Greenwood J. And Renou L. 2004. Model-Driven Requirements Engineering: Synchronising Models in an Air Traffic Management Case Study. In Proceedings of CAiSE'2004, Springer, 368--383.

[12]

Miles, M. B, and Huberman, A. M. 1994: Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications.

[13]

Moody, D., Heymans, P. and Matulevicius, R. 2012. Visual syntax does; matter: improving the cognitive effectiveness of the i* visual notation. RE 15.2 (2010). Springer, 141--175.

Digital Library

[14]

Ncube C., Lockerbie J. and Maiden N. A. M. (2007). Automatically Generating Requirements from i* Models: A Case Study with a Complex Airport Operations System. In Proceedings of REFSQ'07, 33--47.

Digital Library

[15]

Nysetvold, A. G. and Krogstie, J. 2006. Assessing Business Process Modeling Languages Using a Generic Quality Framework. In Advanced Topics in Database Research Series Vol 5, Siau, K., Ed. Idea Group, 79--93.

[16]

Krogstie, B., Prilla M., Knipfer, K., Wessel, D. and Pammer, V. 2012. Computer support for reflective learning in the workplace: A model. In Proceedings of ICALT 2012 (Rome, Italy, July 4--5, 2012). IEEE CS.

Digital Library

[17]

Pammer, V., Knipfer, K., Krogstie, B., Wessel, D., Prilla, M. and Lindstaedt, S. 2011. Reflective Learning at Work - A Position and Discussion Paper. In ARNets11 - Awareness and Reflection in Learning Networks at EC-TEL 2011, Palermo.

[18]

Petre, M. 1995. Why looking isn't always seeing. Readership skills and graphical programming. Communications of the ACM, 38.6 (June 1995), 33--44.

Digital Library

[19]

Yu, E. S. K. and Mylopoulos, J. 1994. Using goals, rules, and methods to support reasoning in business process reengineering. In: Proc. of HICCS'27, Nunamaker, J. F. and Sprague, R. H., Eds. IEEE CS Press., 234--243.

[20]

Zachos K., Lockerbie, J., Hughes B., and Matthews P. 2011. Towards a framework for describing cloud service characteristics for use by chief information officers. In Proceedings of the RESS Workshop, Trento, Italy, 16--22.

Cited By

Krogstie JKrogstie J(2016)Quality of Business Process ModelsQuality in Business Process Modeling10.1007/978-3-319-42512-2_2(53-102)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42512-2_2
Krogstie BPrilla MPammer V(2013)Understanding and Supporting Reflective Learning Processes in the WorkplaceProceedings of the 8th European Conference on Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact - Volume 809510.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_13(151-164)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_13

Index Terms

Collaborative modelling of reflection to inform the development and evaluation of work-based learning technologies
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. Collaborative learning
2. Computing methodologies
  1. Modeling and simulation
    1. Model development and analysis
      1. Modeling methodologies

Recommendations

Collaborative reflection at work: supporting informal learning at a healthcare workplace
GROUP '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

Reflection is a common means to improve work: Every day, people think back to past work and - oftentimes in a group - try to find out whether they can improve it or whether they can derive better practices from it. However, especially collaborative ...
Effects of an individual's prior knowledge on collaborative knowledge construction and individual learning outcomes in videoconferencing
CSCL '05: Proceedings of th 2005 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning: learning 2005: the next 10 years!

This paper deals with collaborative knowledge construction in videoconferencing. The main topic for investigation is how to predict individual learning outcomes, and in particular the degree to which an individual's prior knowledge and collaborative ...
Supporting Collaborative Reflection at Work: A Comparative Case Analysis
GROUP '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work

Reflection is a common activity at work. Collaborative reflection is an activity in which multiple participants add to reflection by sharing experiences, perspectives and insights together, thus transcending individual capabilities. Despite its ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

i-KNOW '12: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies

September 2012

244 pages

ISBN:9781450312424

DOI:10.1145/2362456

Conference Chairs:
Stefanie Lindstaedt
Graz University of Technology, Austria
,
Michael Granitzer
University Passau, Germany

Copyright © 2012 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 September 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

i-Know '12

i-Know '12: 12th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies

September 5 - 7, 2012

Graz, Austria

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 77 of 238 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
172
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Krogstie JKrogstie J(2016)Quality of Business Process ModelsQuality in Business Process Modeling10.1007/978-3-319-42512-2_2(53-102)Online publication date: 28-Oct-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42512-2_2
Krogstie BPrilla MPammer V(2013)Understanding and Supporting Reflective Learning Processes in the WorkplaceProceedings of the 8th European Conference on Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact - Volume 809510.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_13(151-164)Online publication date: 17-Sep-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_13

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents